Comparison of the Ratio of the Neck Circumference to the Distance between the Outer Ear Canal and the upper Edge of the Manubrium with Cormack-Lehane Score

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Resident, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Failure to maintain airway after induction of general anesthesia or in patients with multiple trauma who need airway resuscitation or oxygen delivery is one of the most common causes of mortality and disability. Therefore, in this study we aimed to investigate the association between the neck circumference and the distance between the outer ear canal and the upper edge of the manubrium compared to Cormack-Lehane score in patients undergoing laryngoscopy.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the neck circumferential of patients was determined by the location of the thyroid gland in centimeters and the distance between the outer ear canal and the upper edge of the manubrium was determined and divided by the circumference of the neck to achieve the index. In the next step, using the score of Cormack-Lehane, the grading of larynx was assessed and compared with the index.Findings: 18 patients (15.65%) had severe laryngoscopy and 97 (84.35%) had easy laryngoscopy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) diagram was between 0.5 and 0.6 which was less than 0.6 and indicated that the studied index was not a suitable criterion for assessment of the difficulty of laryngoscopy and was not different from random selection (P = 0.255).Conclusion: Taken together, the results of our study showed that the ratio of the peripheral neck circumference to distance between the outer canal and manubrium could not be used as a suitable alternative to the Cormack-Lehane score for prediction of difficult intubation.

Keywords

References

  1. Larson C, Mund A, Leon S, Privette A, Eriksson E. 1770: Anesthesia management parameters associated with decreasing respiratory compliance. Crit Care Med 2020; 48(1): 859.
  2. Ellard L, Wong DT. Preoperative airway evaluation. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2020; 10(1): 19-27.
  3. Giovannitti JA. Periodontal airway management strategies. In: Giovannitti J, editor. Moderate sedation and emergency medicine for periodontists. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 45-52.
  4. Sreekantha DK, Saldanha RS, Krishnappa JG, Mehandale SG, Carmel Glen RR, Prajna MK. Predicting difficulties in Mask Ventilation using Machine Learning techniques. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER); 2019 Aug 11-12; Manipal, India.
  5. Banavasi A, Hegde H. Prediction of difficult airway: comparison between individual predictor with combination of pre-operative predictors. Int J Sci Res 2019; 8(12): 1-3.
  6. Khan ZH, Mohammadi M, Rasouli MR, Farrokhnia F, Khan RH. The diagnostic value of the upper lip bite test combined with sternomental distance, thyromental distance, and interincisor distance for prediction of easy laryngoscopy and intubation: A prospective study. Anesth Analg 2009; 109(3): 822-4.
  7. Huh J, Shin HY, Kim SH, Yoon TK, Kim DK. Diagnostic predictor of difficult laryngoscopy: The hyomental distance ratio. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(2): 544-8.
  8. Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: A retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42(5): 487-90.
  9. Honarmand A, Kheirabadi D, Safavi MR, Taghaei M, Golshani NM. Comparison of the acromio-axillosuprasternal notch index with five anatomical indices for the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2019; 36(7): 542-4.
  10. Cook TM. A new practical classification of laryngeal view. Anaesthesia 2000; 55(3): 274-9.
  11. Patel B, Khandekar R, Diwan R, Shah A. Validation of modified Mallampati test with addition of thyromental distance and sternomental distance to predict difficult endotracheal intubation in adults. Indian J Anaesth 2014; 58(2): 171-5.
  12. Lundstrom LH, Moller AM, Rosenstock C, Astrup G, Wetterslev J. High body mass index is a weak predictor for difficult and failed tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 91,332 consecutive patients scheduled for direct laryngoscopy registered in the Danish Anesthesia Database. Anesthesiology 2009; 110(2): 266-74.
  13. Cordovani D, Russell T, Wee W, Suen A, Cooper RM. Measurement of forces applied using a Macintosh direct laryngoscope compared with a Glidescope video laryngoscope in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2019; 36(3): 221-6.
  14. Yildiz TS, Korkmaz F, Solak M, Toker K, Erciyes N, Bayrak F, et al. Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation in Turkish patients: A multi-center methodological study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24(12): 1034-40.
  15. Maeda A, Fujita N, Nagasaka Y. Respiratory and Airway Considerations in Obstetric Patients. Current Anesthesiology Reports 2019; 9(1): 48-54.
  16. Honarmand A, Safavi MR. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric patients scheduled for Caesarean delivery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25(9): 714-20.
  17. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG, Vierra M, Saidman LJ. Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2002; 94(3): 732-6.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 38, Issue 566 - Serial Number 566
January and February 2020
Pages 129-134

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 28 May 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics