روان‌شناسی سلامت و بحران پاندمی ویروس کرونا (کووید 19): یک مطالعه‌ی مروری

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه روان‌شناسی سلامت، دانشکده‌ی پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 استاد، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی سلامت، گروه علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، پردیس بین‌الملل کیش، کیش، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: شیوع بیماری کرونا (کووید 19) علاوه بر تأثیرات جسمی، سبب پیامدهای روان‌شناختی جدی شده است. هدف از انجام این مطالعه، مرور اجمالی پیامدهای روان‌شناختی بحران پاندومی بیماری کووید 19 و راه‌کارهای روان‌شناسی سلامت در مقابله با این بحران است.روش‌ها: در این مطالعه‌ی مروری که در فروردین سال 1399 انجام شد، از مقالات نمایه‌ شده درباره‌ی روان‌شناسی و کرونا در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی Proquest، ‌Pubmed، Scientific Information Database (SID)، Ovid، Iranmedex، Science direct، Springer، Google Scholar و Scopus استفاده شد.یافته‌ها: با مرور منابع معتبر مشخص شد که پیامدهای روان‌شناختی بیماری کووید-19 در پرسنل درمانی و مراقبت‌های بهداشتی، مردم عادی، بیماران مبتلا، خانواده‌ی بیماران مبتلا و کودکان متفاوت است.نتیجه‌گیری: در چشم‌انداز روان‌شناسی سلامت، راهبردهای مراقبتی برای طیف مختلف افراد و در نهایت، کاهش اثرات قرنطینه ارایه شده است. همچنین، شواهد پژوهشی سایکونوروایمونولوژیکال مبنی بر تأثیر استرس و پیامدهای منفی روان‌شناختی بر عملکرد سیستم ایمنی افراد و آسیب‌پذیری بیشتر در برابر ویروس کرونا مورد بحث قرار گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Health Psychology and Coronavirus Pandemic Crisis (COVID-19): A Review Study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Bagherian-Sararoudi 1
  • Ahmad Alipour 2
  • Bahareh Mirahmadi 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Health Psychology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD Student of Health Psychology, Department of Humanities, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Kish, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: In addition to physical effects, the prevalence of COVID-19 has serious psychological consequences. The aim of this study was to provide a brief overview of the psychological consequences of the pandemic crisis of COVID-19 disease, and the strategies of health psychology in dealing with this crisis.Methods: In this review study that was done in March 2020, indexed articles on psychology and corona were used at the ProQuest, Pubmed, Scientific Information Database (SID), Ovid, Iranmedex, Science direct, Springer, google scholar, Scopus database.Findings: It was determined by reviewing reliable sources that psychological consequences of COVID-19 disease were different among health stuff, general population, infected patients, their families, and children, separately.Conclusion: From the perspective of health psychology, care strategies for different spectrums of individuals and ultimately reducing the effects of quarantine have been proposed. Furthermore, psychoneuroimmunological research evidence of the effects of stress and negative psychological consequences on immune function and greater vulnerability to coronavirus has also been discussed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • COVID-19
  • Quarantine
  • Psychology
  • Psychosocial aspects

مراجع

  1. Tsang KW, Ho PL, Ooi GC, Yee WK, Wang T, Chan-Yeung M, et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(20): 1977-85.
  2. Poutanen SM, Low DE, Henry B, Finkelstein S, Rose D, Green K, et al. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(20): 1995-2005.
  3. Cheng C, Tang CS. The psychology behind the masks: Psychological responses to the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in different regions. Asian J Soc Psychol 2004; 7(1): 3-7.
  4. Johal S. Psychosocial impacts of quarantine during disease outbreaks and interventions that may help to relieve strain. N Z Med J 2009; 122(1296): 47-52.
  5. AlNajjar NS, Attar LM, Farahat FM, AlThaqafi A. Psychobehavioural responses to the 2014 Middle East respiratory syndrome-novel corona virus (MERS CoV) among adults in two shopping malls in Jeddah, western Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J 2017; 22(11): 817-23.
  6. World Health Organization. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: Case definition for reporting to WHO [Online]. [cited 2017 Jul 26]; Available from: URL:
  7. https://www.who.int/csr/disease/coronavirus_infections/case_definition/en/
  8. Guarner J. Three emerging coronaviruses in two decades. Am J Clin Pathol 2020; 153(4): 420-1.
  9. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395(10223): 497-506.
  10. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020.
  11. Tian S, Hu W, Niu L, Liu H, Xu H, Xiao SY. Pulmonary pathology of early-phase 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia in two patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15(5): 700-4.
  12. Qian M, Wu Q, Wu P, Hou Z, Liang Y, Cowling BJ, et al. Psychological responses, behavioral changes and public perceptions during the early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China: A population based cross-sectional survey. medRxiv 2020; 2020.
  13. Sim K, Huak CY, Chong PN, Chua HC, Wen SS. Psychosocial and coping responses within the community health care setting towards a national outbreak of an infectious disease. J Psychosom Res 2010; 68(2): 195-202.
  14. Wang Y, Di Y, Ye J, Wei W. Study on the public psychological states and its related factors during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some regions of China. Psychol Health Med 2020; 1-10. [Epub ahead of print].
  15. West R, Michie S, Rubin GJ, Amlot R. Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Nat Hum Behav 2020; 4(5): 451-9.
  16. Leung GM, Lam TH, Ho LM, Ho SY, Chan BH, Wong IO, et al. The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57(11): 857-63.
  17. Liu S, Yang L, Zhang C, Xiang YT, Liu Z, Hu S, et al. Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7(4): e17-e18.
  18. Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, Bennett J, Peladeau N, Leszcz M, et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ 2003; 168(10): 1245-51.
  19. Bai Y, Lin CC, Lin CY, Chen JY, Chue CM, Chou P. Survey of stress reactions among health care workers involved with the SARS outbreak. Psychiatr Serv 2004; 55(9): 1055-7.
  20. Lee AM, Wong JG, McAlonan GM, Cheung V, Cheung C, Sham PC, et al. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can J Psychiatry 2007; 52(4): 233-40.
  21. Alipour A, Ghadami A, Alipour Z, Abdollahzadeh H. Preliminary validation of the Corona Disease Anxiety Scale (CDAS) in the Iranian sample. Journal of Health Psychology 2020; 8(32): 163-75. [In Persian].
  22. Zhang C, Yang L, Liu S, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, et al. Survey of insomnia and related social psychological factors among medical staff involved in the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11: 306.
  23. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(5).
  24. Hall RC, Hall RC, Chapman MJ. The 1995 Kikwit Ebola outbreak: Lessons hospitals and physicians can apply to future viral epidemics. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2008; 30(5): 446-52.
  25. Rubin GJ, Potts HW, Michie S. The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: Results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technol Assess 2010; 14(34): 183-266.
  26. Van Bortel T, Basnayake A, Wurie F, Jambai M, Koroma AS, Muana AT, et al. Psychosocial effects of an Ebola outbreak at individual, community and international levels. Bull World Health Organ 2016; 94(3): 210-4.
  27. Lima CKT, Carvalho PMM, Lima IAAS, Nunes JVAO, Saraiva JS, de Souza RI, et al. The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new Coronavirus disease). Psychiatry Res 2020; 287: 112915.
  28. Shigemura J, Ursano RJ, Morganstein JC, Kurosawa M, Benedek DM. Public responses to the novel 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Japan: Mental health consequences and target populations. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2020; 74(4): 281-2.
  29. World Health Organization. Mental health and psychosocial considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak [Online]. [cited 2020 Mar 18]; Available from: URL: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/mental-health-considerations.pdf
  30. Rubin GJ, Wessely S. The psychological effects of quarantining a city. BMJ 2020; 368: m313.
  31. National Health Commission of China. Guidelines for psychological assistance hotlines during 2019-nCoV Pneumonia epidemic [2020]. Available from: http: //www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s3577/202002/f389f20cc1174b21b981ea2919beb8b0.shtml. [In Chinese].
  32. Duan L, Zhu G. Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7(4): 300-2.
  33. Tansey CM, Louie M, Loeb M, Gold WL, Muller MP, de Jager J, et al. One-year outcomes and health care utilization in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167(12): 1312-20.
  34. Yardley S, Rolph M. Death and dying during the pandemic. BMJ 2020; 369: m1472.
  35. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, McIntyre RS, et al. A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain Behav Immun 2020.
  36. Stein A, Dalton L, Rapa E, Bluebond-Langner M, Hanington L, Stein KF, et al. Communication with children and adolescents about the diagnosis of their own life-threatening condition. Lancet 2019; 393(10176): 1150-63.
  37. Wells A. Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York, NY: Guilford Publications; 2009.
  38. Rodin P, Ghersetti M, Oden T. Disentangling rhetorical subarenas of public health crisis communication: A study of the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in the news media and social media in Sweden. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 2019; 27(3): 237-46.
  39. Carlson LE. Mindfulness-based interventions for physical conditions: A narrative review evaluating levels of evidence. ISRN Psychiatry 2012; 2012: 651583.
  40. Barbisch D, Koenig KL, Shih FY. Is there a case for quarantine? Perspectives from SARS to Ebola. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2015; 9(5): 547-53.
  41. Miles SH. Kaci Hickox: Public health and the politics of fear. Am J Bioeth 2015; 15(4): 17-9.
  42. Manuell ME, Cukor J. Mother Nature versus human nature: Public compliance with evacuation and quarantine. Disasters 2011; 35(2): 417-42.
  43. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020; 395(10227): 912-20.
  44. Bagherian R, Andalib A. The role of psychoneuroimmunological processes in pathogenesis of coronary artery disease. J Isfahan Med Sch 2010; 28(107): 293-302. [In Persian].
  45. Bagherian Sararoudi R, Kheirabadi GR, Kousha M, Toghani F, Hashemi M, Maracy MR. Is there any association of personality traits with vascular endothelial function or systemic inflammation? Adv Biomed Res 2014; 3: 210.
  46. Lin TK, Weng CY, Wang WC, Chen CC, Lin IM, Lin CL. Hostility trait and vascular dilatory functions in healthy Taiwanese. J Behav Med 2008; 31(6): 517-24.
  47. Kheirabadi GR, Toghani F, Kousha M, Hashemi M, Maracy MR, Sharifi MR, et al. Is there any association of anxiety-depressive symptoms with vascular endothelial function or systemic inflammation? J Res Med Sci 2013; 18(11): 979-83.
  48. Bagherian Sararoudi R, Maracy M, Saenei HM, Shiri M. The relationship of perceived social support and locus of control subscales with illness perception in myocardial infarction patients, using Structural Equation Modeling. Arch Psychiatry Psychother 2019; 21(12): 36-44.
  49. Alipour A, Siadati SM. The effect of examination stress on changes of salivary cortisol and puls rate in children and the role of personality traits on them. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2006; 8(2): 19-26. [In Persian].
  50. Torkamani F, Aghayousefi A, Alipour A, Nami M. Effects of single-session group mantra-meditation on salivary immunoglobulin a and affective state: a psychoneuroimmunology viewpoint. Explore (NY) 2018; 14(2): 114-21.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
دوره 38، شماره 570 - شماره پیاپی 570
خرداد و تیر 1399
صفحه 216-226

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 01 اردیبهشت 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 11 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 فروردین 1401

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار