The Challenges of the Implemented Curriculum of the Basic Sciences Course of Iranian National General Medicine Program from the Students' Point of View

Document Type : Original Article (s)

10.22122/jims.v39i620.13664

Abstract

Background: In order to identify the challenges and shortcomings of the basic medical sciences course based on the Iranian national curriculum, and to offer proposed solutions to solve possible problems, the implemented curriculum was reviewed by the learners.
Methods: This study was conducted by program evaluation method in Isfahan Medical School, Iran, during the first semester of 2019-2020. Participants in this study included 76 students of basic science course of the national entrance program, starting their education from October 2017 or later, purposefully selected from students interested in education and with a grade point average of above. With structured group interviews, 61 lessons were examined. All interviews in the form of guidance, were recorded, handwritten, and typed. Then, it was analyzed by quantitative content analysis (percentage and frequency).
Findings: A total of 35 courses, including 6 in first semester, 7 in second semester, 8 in third semester, 9 in fourth semester, and 5 in fifth semester, faced challenges for the students. A total of 176 initial codes were extracted. Finally, 131 codes were obtained, which were placed in 4 main domains and 36 components. The main categories included design with 6 components, implementation with 15 components, student evaluation with 5 components, and professional behavior with 6 components. The highest frequency of challenges was in the implementation of theoretical courses (92 lessons) which included 43.2% of the courses.
Conclusion: Nearly half of the basic science courses in the National General Medicine Program faced challenges for students. The most frequent challenge was in the implementation of theoretical courses. Lack of a complete course plan in the category of design, disproportionate volume of content with class hours in the category of theoretical courses, inadequacy of equipment and tools in the category of practical courses, failure to handle student protests in the category of student evaluation, and finally liquidity and inflexibility in the category of teacher professional behavior was the most challenged by students.

Keywords

References

Lattuca LR, Stark JS. Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
Zekeri AA. College curriculum competencies and skills former students found essential to their careers. Coll Stud J 2004; 38(3): 412.
Bay E. Developing a Scale on "Factors Regarding Curriculum Alignment". Journal of Education and Training Studies 2016; 4(5): 8-17.
Khan M, Law L. An integrative approach to curriculum development in higher education in the USA: A theoretical framework. Int Educ Stud 2015; 8(3):66-76.
Gude T, Hjortdahl P, Anvik T, Baerheim A, Fasmer OB, Grimstad H, et al. Does change from a traditional to a new medical curriculum reduce negative attitudes among students? A quasi-experimental study. Med Teach 2005; 27(8): 737-9.
Brynhildsen J, Dahle LO, Behrbohm FM, Rundquist I, Hammar M. Attitudes among students and teachers on vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Teach 2002; 24(3): 286-8.
Custers EJ, Cate OT. Medical students' attitudes towards and perception of the basic sciences: a comparison between students in the old and the new curriculum at the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Med Educ 2002; 36(12): 1142-50.
High Council of Medical Education Planning. The revised version of the medical doctoral program approved by the 67th session. [In Persian].
Vafamehr V, Dadgostarnia M. Evaluation of new program of ICM. Iran J Med Edu 2011; 10(5): 839-50. [In Persian].
Fitzpatrick JL, Sanders JR, Worthen BR. Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York, NY: Pearson Education; 2017.
Siabani S, Moradi MR, Siabani H, Rezaei Ms, Siabani S, Amolaei KH, et al. Students view points on the educational problems in medical school of Kermanshah University of Medcial Sciences (2007). Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2009; 13(2 (41)): 162-71. [In Persian].
Momayyezi M, Mazloomy S, Aminipour M, Momayyezi M. Talented Students View Points on the Educational Problems in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in 2010. Iran J Med Edu 2012; 12(1): 55-66. [In Persian].
Mansourian HR, Shoja MR, Salimi T, Mojahed S, Karimi H, Aghili H, et al. Evaluating the course plan status of faculty staff of shahid Saduoghi University of Medical Science of Yazd in the year 2002. Iran J Med Edu 2002; 2(0): 37-8. [In Persian].
Delgoshaei B, Sadeghifar J, Raadabadi M, Peyman H, Mirzaei A. Content Analysis of the Lesson Plans Developed by Faculty of Ilam University of Medical Sciences in 2009. Iran J Med Edu 2012; 12(1): 1-9. [In Persian].
Nikbakhsh N, Amri P, Mohammadi Kenari H, Razaghi F. Evaluation of lesson plans of faculty members of medical and dental schools of Babol University of Medical Sciences. Babol Univ Med Sci 2010; 12(Suppl 1): 14-8. [In Persian].
Maleki H. Curriculum planning (practice guide). Mashhad, Iran: Payame Andisheh; 2004. [In Persian].
Rushton A. Formative assessment: a key to deep learning? Med Teach 2005; 27(6): 509-13.
Davis M. Barriers to Reflective Practice: The Changing Nature of Higher Education. Active Learn High Educ 2003; 4(3): 243-55.
Obeidi N. Effective factors on the communication between students and faculty members in the viewpoint of paramedical students. Educational Strategies 2010; 3(3): 133-6. [In Persian].
Seyedmajidi M, Seyedmajidi SA, Rayyani A, Gilchini F, Gholinia H, Bijani A. Determine the effective factors on student and professor communication from the views of clinical students in Babol dental school. Med Ed J 2016; 4(2): 13-9. [In Persian].
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 39, Issue 620
2021
Pages 234-239

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 April 2022
  • Accept Date: 01 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics