Evaluation of the Effect of Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Lidocaine on Pain Intensity in Comparison to Control Group in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Student of Medicine, Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Postsurgical pain is one of the complications that can affect patient's life negatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intravenous lidocaine in comparison to intraperitoneal lidocaine on postsurgical pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial study on96 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Alzahra hospital, Isfahan, Iran in 2013-2014. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I and II considered to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into 3 groups of control, intravenous lidocaine, and intraperitoneal lidocaine. Collected data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, and chi-square tests via SPSS software. P value of less than 0.050 was considered significant.Findings: Mean pain intensity based on visual analogue scale (VAS) was considerably higher in control group in comparison to two others (P < 0.050 for both). In addition, mean dose of postsurgical pethidine administration was significantly higher in control group (P < 0.001).Conclusion: This study showed that intravenous and intraperitoneal lidocaine can reduce postsurgical pain intensity, and pethidine administration in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords

References

  1. Black JM, Hawks JH. Medical-surgical nursing: Clinical management for positive outcomes. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2008.
  2. Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet 2011; 377(9784): 2215-25.
  3. Kim TH, Kang H, Hong JH, Park JS, Baek CW, Kim JY, et al. Intraperitoneal and intravenous lidocaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-
  4. controlled study. Surg Endosc 2011; 25(10): 3183-90.
  5. Rawal N. Postoperative pain treatment for ambulatory surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007; 21(1): 129-48.
  6. El-Tahan MR, Warda OM, Diab DG, Ramzy EA, Matter MK. A randomized study of the effects of perioperative i.v. lidocaine on hemodynamic and hormonal responses for cesarean section. J Anesth 2009; 23(2): 215-21.
  7. Haji Nasrollah A, Salehi N, KhoshkarA, Malekpour N, Ghaseminejad A, Velaei N, et al. Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pajouhesh Dar Pezeshki 2005; 29(3): 267-9. [In Persian].
  8. Mouton WG, Bessell JR, Otten KT, Maddern GJ. Pain after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1999; 13(5): 445-8.
  9. Pasqualucci A, de Angelis V, Contardo R, Colo F, Terrosu G, Donini A, et al. Preemptive analgesia: Intraperitoneal local anesthetic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 1996; 85(1): 11-20.
  10. Wills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87(3): 273-84.
  11. Mitra S, Khandelwal P, Roberts K, Kumar S, Vadivelu N. Pain relief in laparoscopic cholecystectomy--a review of the current options. Pain Pract 2012; 12(6): 485-96.
  12. Bisgaard T. Analgesic treatment after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A critical assessment of the evidence. Anesthesiology 2006; 104(4): 835-46.
  13. Katzung BG, Masters SB, Trevor AJ. Basic and clinical pharmacology. 12th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2012.
  14. Cha SM, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Koo GH, Kim BG, et al. Peritrocal and intraperitoneal ropivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. J Surg Res 2012; 175(2): 251-8.
  15. Koppert W, Weigand M, Neumann F, Sittl R, Schuettler J, Schmelz M, et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has preventive effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98(4): 1050-5, table.
  16. Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95(11): 1331-8.
  17. Rattanalappaiboon D, Werawatakul Y, Tharnprisan P, Prasit M. Intraperitoneal lidocaine for decreasing intra-operative pain during postpartum tubal resection in Srinagarind Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2012; 95(4): 477-81.
  18. Kang H, Kim BG. Intravenous lidocaine for effective pain relief after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Int Med Res 2011; 39(2): 435-45.
  19. Tikuisis R, Miliauskas P, Samalavicius NE, Zurauskas A, Samalavicius R, Zabulis V. Intravenous lidocaine for post-operative pain relief after hand-assisted laparoscopic colon surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18(4): 373-80.
  20. McCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Drugs 2010; 70(9): 1149-63.
  21. Cassuto J, Wallin G, Hogstrom S, Faxen A, Rimback G. Inhibition of postoperative pain by continuous low-dose intravenous infusion of lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1985; 64(10): 971-4.
  22. Khan MR, Raza R, Zafar SN, Shamim F, Raza SA, Pal KM, et al. Intraperitoneal lignocaine (lidocaine) versus bupivacaine after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 2012; 178(2): 662-9.
  23. Martin F, Cherif K, Gentili ME, Enel D, Abe E, Alvarez JC, et al. Lack of impact of intravenous lidocaine on analgesia, functional recovery, and nociceptive pain threshold after total hip arthroplasty. Anesthesiology 2008; 109(1): 118-23.
  24. Ness TJ. Intravenous lidocaine inhibits visceral nociceptive reflexes and spinal neurons in the rat. Anesthesiology 2000; 92(6): 1685-91.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 35, Issue 441 - Serial Number 441
July and August 2017
Pages 927-933

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 May 2017
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics