مطالعه‌ی کیفیت رابطه‌ی پزشک- بیمار و ارتباط آن با میزان استفاده از طب سنتی و مکمل

نوع مقاله : مقاله های پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد، گروه جامعه‌شناسی و برنامه‌ریزی اجتماعی، دانشکده‌ی علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

2 استادیار، مرکز تحقیقات طب سنتی و تاریخ طب، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز، شیراز، ایران

3 کارشناس ارشد، گروه جامعه‌شناسی و برنامه‌ریزی اجتماعی، دانشکده‌ی علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر، مطالعه‌ی چگونگی کیفیت رابطه‌ی پزشک- بیمار، سنجش رابطه‌ی میان میزان نارضایتی از رابطه‌ی پزشک- بیمار و میزان استفاده از طب سنتی و مکمل در میان مراجعه‌ کنندگان به مراکز طب غیر ‌رایج بود.روش‌ها: این پژوهش، مطالعه‌ای تحلیلی- ‌مقطعی بود که در آن، ۸۰۰ نفر از مراجعه‌ کنندگان به ۶ مرکز طب غیر‌ رایج شهر شیراز در تیر ماه ۱۳۹۵، با کسب رضایت از آن‌ها و به روش تمام‌شماری مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. داده‌ها با استفاده از پرسش‌نامه‌ی محقق‌ساخته که اعتبار و پایایی آن تأیید گردید، جمع‌آوری و با به کارگیری نرم‌افزار SPSS تحلیل شدند.یافته‌ها: ۶۱ درصد از مراجعه ‌کنندگان به مراکز طب غیر‌ رایج شهر شیراز، از کیفیت رابطه‌ی پزشک-‌ـ‌ ‌‌بیمار به میزان متوسط ناراضی بودند و همبستگی معنی‌داری بین میزان نارضایتی افراد از رابطه‌ی پزشک- ‌بیمار و میزان استفاده از طب سنتی و مکمل وجود داشت؛ به ‌طوری ‌که میزان نارضایتی بیشتر، با میزان به کارگیری بیشتر طب سنتی و مکمل همراه بود.نتیجه‌گیری: میزان استفاده از طب سنتی و مکمل، با میزان نارضایتی از رابطه‌ی پزشک- بیمار دارای ارتباط است؛ پس اگر اقداماتی جهت بهبود این رابطه صورت نگیرد، نارضایتی بیش‌تر، استفاده‌ی بیش‌تر از طب غیر رایج را در ‌پی ‌دارد. بنابراین، اقداماتی جهت بهبود رابطه‌ی پزشک‌ـ ‌بیمار از طریق آموزش، فرهنگ‌سازی و توجه بیشتر به حقوق طرفین، می‌تواند از پیامد‌های استفاده‌ی افراطی و بدون اطلاع پزشک از طب سنتی و مکمل جلوگیری کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Quality of Doctor-Patient Relationship and its Effect on Usage of Traditional and Complementary Medicine

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Movahed 1
  • Alireza Salehi 2
  • Razieh Rayanpour 3
1 Professor, Department of Sociology and Social Planning, School of Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3 Department of Sociology and Social Planning, School of Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: The present study aimed to study the quality of doctor-patient relationship, and measure the extent of relationship between the dissatisfaction with the doctor-patient relationship and the usage rate of traditional and complementary medicine among the people who visited the non-conventional medical centers in Shiraz city, Iran.Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study in which 800 people who visited six non-conventional medical centers in July 2016 were enrolled; having gained their satisfaction, they were studied by method of complete enumeration. The data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire. Validity and reliability of data were confirmed and analyzed through SPSS software.Findings: 61 percent of visitors were dissatisfied with the quality of doctor-patient relationship to mediocre extent. There was a significant correlation between the dissatisfaction extent of visitors for doctor-patient relationship and the usage rate of traditional and complementary medicine in that the high dissatisfaction extent was accompanied with the high consumption rate of traditional and complementary medicine.Conclusion: The usage rate of the traditional and complementary medicine is in relation with the dissatisfaction extent of medical behavior. Thus, providing the doctor-patient relationship is not improved, high dissatisfaction and high consumption of non-conventional medicine will be seen. Therefore, it is to take action to improve the doctor-patient relationship by means of education, and culturalization; in addition, it is to pay more attention to parties’ rights in order to avoid the consequences of excessive and without doctors’ leave usage of traditional and complementary medicine.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Traditional Medicine
  • Complementary Medicine
  • Doctor-patient relationship

مراجع

  1. Islam G, Zyphur M. Ways of interacting: The standardization of communication in medical training. Human Relations 2007; 60(5): 769-92.
  2. Bieber C, Muller KG, Nicolai J, Hartmann M, Eich W. How does your doctor talk with you? Preliminary validation of a brief patient self-report questionnaire on the quality of physician-patient interaction. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2010; 17(2): 125-36.
  3. Zali MR. The novel principle of doctor-patient relationship: The guidelines for good clinical practice proposed on the basis of current views in medical ethics. Tehran, Iran: Academy of Medical Sciences; 2007. [In Persian].
  4. Rao JK, Weinberger M, Kroenke K. Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes: a literature review. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9(10): 1148-55.
  5. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995; 152(9): 1423-33.
  6. Tongue JR, Epps HR, Forese LL. Communication skills for patient-centred care: Research-based, easily learned techniques for medical interviews that benefit orthopaedic surgeons and their patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87-A(3): 652-8.
  7. Frass M, Strassl RP, Friehs H, Mullner M, Kundi M, Kaye AD. Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review. Ochsner J 2012; 12(1): 45-56.
  8. Zhang Y, Leach MJ, Hall H, Sundberg T, Ward T, Sibbritt D, Adams J, et al. Differences between male and female consumers of complementary and alternative medicine in a national US population: A secondary analysis of 2012 NIHS data. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2015; 2015: 413173.
  9. Kalaria D. Complementary and alternative medicine: a pharmacist's perspective on patient needs. Healthc Pap 2003; 3(5): 67-70.
  10. Sadighi J, Maftoon F, Moshrefi M. Knowledge and attitude toward the Complementary and alternative medicine and the use of these services in Tehran population. Payesh 2004; 3(4): 279-89. [In Persian].
  11. Tehrani Banihashemi SA, Asgharifard H, Haghdoust AA, Barghamadi M, Mohammad Hosseini N. The use of complementary/alternative medicine among the general population in Tehran, Iran. Payesh 2008; 7(4): 335-62. [In Persian].
  12. Furnham A, Forey J. The attitudes, behaviors and beliefs of patients of conventional vs. complementary (alternative) medicine. J Clin Psychol 1994; 50(3): 458-69.
  13. Sharma U. Complementary Medicine Today: Practitioners and Patients. London, UK: Routledge; 1991.
  14. Furnham A, Smith C. Choosing alternative medicine: a comparison of the beliefs of patients visiting a general practitioner and a homoeopath. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26(7): 685-9.
  15. Siahpush M. Post-modern values, dissatisfaction with conventional medicine and popularity of alternative therapies. In: Vanclay F, Mesiti L, editors. Sustainability and social research. 1st ed. Wagga Wagga, Australia: Charles Sturt University; 1997. p. 105-19.
  16. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Jung HP, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, et al. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50(460): 882-7.
  17. Poonthananiwatkul B, Howard RL, Williamson EM, Lim RH. Why cancer patients choose in-patient complementary therapy in palliative care: a qualitative study at Arokhayasala Hospice in Thailand. Eur J Integr Med 2016; 8 (3):260-5.
  18. Roberts CS, Baker F, Hann D, Runfola J, Witt C, McDonald J, et al. Patient-physician communication regarding use of complementary therapies during cancer treatment. J Psychosoc Oncol 2005; 23(4): 35-60.
  19. Easthope G. The response of orthodox medicine to the challenge of alternative medicine in Australia. Aust Nz J Sociol 1993; 29(3): 289-301.
  20. Sharma U. Using alternative therapies: marginal medicine and central encounters. In: Abott P, Payne G, editors. New directions in the sociology of health. London, UK: Falmer Press; 1990. p. 127-89.
  21. Taylor RCR. Alternative medicine and the medical encounter in Britain and the United States. In: Salmon JW, editor. Alternative medicines: popular and policy perspectives. New York, NY: Tavistock; 1984. p. 191-228.
  22. Parker G, Tupling H. Consumer evaluation of natural therapists and general practitioners. Med J Aust 1977; 1(17): 619-22.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
دوره 35، شماره 421 - شماره پیاپی 421
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1396
صفحه 177-185

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 18 دی 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 12 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 فروردین 1401

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار