Validation Study of Self-Reported Anthropometric Indices among the Staff of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Food Security Research Center AND Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 PhD Candidate, Food Security Research Center AND Students Research Committee, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 General Practitioner, Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Professor, Food Security Research Center AND Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

5 Professor, Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Scarce data are available on validity of self-reported anthropometric indices in Iran. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the validity of self-reported anthropometric indices in comparison with the same variables measured by technicians in a subgroup of the staff of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Isfahan, Iran.Methods: In the current study, 200 staff of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences were selected via convenience non-random sampling method. Weight, height, and waist and hip circumferences were questioned by the first technician. The same measures were taken three times by a trained technician according to standard protocols. Mean of three measurements were considered in statistical analysis.Findings: Weight (P = 0.040) and waist circumference (P < 0.001) measures were significantly lower in self-reported values compared to those that measured by the technician. Pearson correlation test between the measured and self-reported anthropometric indices ranged from 0.60 for hip circumference to 0.95 for weight. The highest agreement between the two series of values was observed for normal weight (73%) and overweight and obesity (91%). Overall, 87% of central obesity measured by the technician, was confirmed by self-reported measures. While, less than 13% of people with no abdominal obesity, according to the technician measures, were categorized as abdominally obese by self-reported values.Conclusion: These results indicate that self-reported anthropometric indices are highly accurate among this Iranian population, and are, therefore, appropriate for epidemiologic studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5(4): 561-5.
  2. Stommel M, Schoenborn CA. Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001-2006. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 421.
  3. Niedhammer I, Bugel I, Bonenfant S, Goldberg M, Leclerc A. Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24(9): 1111-8.
  4. Nyholm M, Gullberg B, Merlo J, Lundqvist-Persson C, Rastam L, Lindblad U. The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: Implications for population studies. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007; 15(1): 197-208.
  5. Larsen JK, Ouwens M, Engels RC, Eisinga R, van ST. Validity of self-reported weight and height and predictors of weight bias in female college students. Appetite 2008; 50(2-3): 386-9.
  6. Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. J Am Diet Assoc 2001; 101(1): 28-34.
  7. Craig BM, Adams AK. Accuracy of body mass index categories based on self-reported height and weight among women in the United States. Matern Child Health J 2009; 13(4): 489-96.
  8. Lee DH, Shin A, Kim J, Yoo KY, Sung J. Validity of self-reported height and weight in a Korean population. J Epidemiol 2011; 21(1): 30-6.
  9. Avila-Funes JA, Gutierrez-Robledo LM, Ponce De Leon RS. Validity of height and weight self-report in Mexican adults: results from the national health and aging study. J Nutr Health Aging 2004; 8(5): 355-61.
  10. Khunti K, Taub N, Webb D, Srinivasan B, Stockman J, Griffin SJ, et al. Validity of self-assessed waist circumference in a multi-ethnic UK population. Diabet Med 2012; 29(3): 404-9.
  11. Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Chute CG, Litin LB, Willett WC. Validity of self-reported waist and hip circumferences in men and women. Epidemiology 1990; 1(6): 466-73.
  12. Adibi P, Hassanzadeh Keshteli A, Esmaillzadeh A, Afshar H, Roohafza H, Bagherian-Sararoudi R, et al. The study on the epidemiology of psychological, alimentary health and nutrition (SEPAHAN): Overview of methodology. J Res Med 2012; 17(Spec 2): S291-S297.
  13. Connor GS, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2007; 8(4): 307-26.
  14. Esmaillzadeh A, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Evaluation of waist circumference to predict cardiova scular risk factors in an overweight Tehranian population: findings from Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 2005; 75(5): 347-56.
  15. Azizi F, Khalili D, Aghajani H, Esteghamati A, Hosseinpanah F, Delavari A, et al. Appropriate waist circumference cut-off points among Iranian adults: the first report of the Iranian National Committee of Obesity. Arch Iran Med 2010; 13(3): 243-4.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 33, Issue 346 - Serial Number 346
July and August 2015
Pages 1318-1327

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 05 June 2015
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics