The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Resident, Department of General Surgery, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 General Practitioner, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: The use of temporary or permanent venous catheters in patients with renal failure has been increased recently. Therefore, familiarity with their clinical applications and complications is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the complications and effectiveness of temporary and permanent venous catheters.Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in Alzahra Hospital during 2006-2008. Patients with renal failure candidate for placement of either permanent or temporary central venous catheter were evaluated for early and delayed complications immediately after placement, as well as one and four weeks afterward. Data was analyzed using chi-square test in SPSS16. P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant.Findings: Overall, 114 patients with temporary and 129 patients with permanent catheters participated in this study. The majority of complications among the temporary catheter group were infection (15.3%) and bleeding (5.4%). In the permanent catheter group, the most frequent complications were infection (13.6%) and venous thrombosis (13.6%). Venous thrombosis rate in the temporary catheter group was significantly lower than the permanent catheter group (P < 0.01). The frequency of catheter malfunctions in the temporary and permanent catheter groups were 23.4 % and 6.4%, respectively. Therefore, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001).Conclusion: Since permanent catheters have prolonged and better function than temporary catheters, they are the first and best method of central venous catheterizing for hemodialysis. However, due to the lower venous thrombosis rates of temporary catheters, they are preferred in patients with proper indications for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) until the maturation of AVF.

Keywords

References

  1. Montreuil B. Vascular and peritoneal access. In: Souba WW, Fink MP, Jurkovich GJ, Kaiser LR, Pearce WH, Pemberton JH, editors. ACS Surgery:Principles and Practice. 6th ed. New York: WebMD; 2008. p. 1298-301.
  2. Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM. Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(26): 1735-8.
  3. Milkowski A, Kirker A, Smolenski O, Hartwich A, Pietkun Z. [Permanent catheter as an alternative vascular access for hemodialysis]. Przegl Lek 1996; 53(11): 805-10.
  4. Legendre C, Canaud B. [Permanent catheters for hemodialysis: indications, methods and results. French national survey 1998-2000]. Nephrologie 2001; 22(8): 385-9.
  5. Develter W, De CA, Van BW, Vanholder R, Lameire N. Survival and complications of indwelling venous catheters for permanent use in hemodialysis patients. Artif Organs 2005; 29(5): 399-405.
  6. Rocklin MA, Dwight CA, Callen LJ, Bispham BZ, Spiegel DM. Comparison of cuffed tunneled hemodialysis catheter survival. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37(3): 557-63.
  7. Moss AH, Vasilakis C, Holley JL, Foulks CJ, Pillai K, McDowell DE. Use of a silicone dual-lumen catheter with a Dacron cuff as a long-term vascular access for hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 16(3): 211-5.
  8. Dunea G, Domenico L, Gunnerson P, Winston-Willis F. A survey of permanent double lumen catheters in hemodialysis patients. ASAIO Trans 1991; 37(3): M276-M277.
  9. Whitman ED. Complications associated with the use of central venous access devices. Curr Probl Surg 1996; 33(4): 309-78.
  10. Moist LM, Churchill DN, House AA, Millward SF, Elliott JE, Kribs SW, et al. Regular monitoring of access flow compared with monitoring of venous pressure fails to improve graft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14(10): 2645-53.
  11. Schwab SJ, Harrington JT, Singh A, Roher R, Shohaib SA, Perrone RD, et al. Vascular access for hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1999; 55(5): 2078-90.
  12. Miller PE, Carlton D, Deierhoi MH, Redden DT, Allon M. Natural history of arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36(1): 68-74.
  13. Horattas MC, Wright DJ, Fenton AH, Evans DM, Oddi MA, Kamienski RW, et al. Changing concepts of deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremity--report of a series and review of the literature. Surgery 1988; 104(3): 561-7.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 29, Issue 163 - Serial Number 163
September and October 2012
Pages 2011-2017

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 March 2011
  • Revise Date: 02 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics