The Average of Cumulative Radiation Dose in Neonates in the Neonatal Surgery Ward Due to Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiologic Procedures During the Admission Period

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Student of Medicine, Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Background: The carcinogenic effect of radiation is directly related to the exposure rate and the risk is even more in infants. The scope of the present study is to evaluate of the average of cumulative radiation dose in neonates in the neonatal surgery ward due to diagnostic and therapeutic radiologic procedures during the admission period, in Alzahra hospital of Isfahan, Iran.Methods: This investigation was a descriptive study on 168 neonates. It was done in neonatal surgery ward during last 9 months of 2009 in Alzahra hospital of Isfahan, Iran. The patients were selected randomly and with no attention to age, sex, diagnose and admision time. Thermo luminescent dosimeters (TLD GR200), were used for dosimetry and each chips was putted in a plastic envelope on the neonate sternum during the admission period. The cumulative absorbed dose by each patient was stored during the admission by TLD and followed by reading by TLD reader. For using of TLDs, they were calibrated and two calibration factors (individual and batch) were performed in radiotherapy section of Seyed Al-shohada hospital of Isfahan, Iran. After checking the accuracy of calibration, the absorbed dose by each patient was achieved by using of calibration factors.Finding: The average of admission time for each patient was 7.64 days and the average of cumulative absorbed dose was 3.13 Millisievert (mSv) during this time. The maximum absorbed dose in one patient was 42.83 mSv. The average number of conventional radiography for each patient was 2.77. The average of conventional radiography and cumulative absorbed dose in patient with no examination or just simple x-ray examinations was 2.58 and 0.863 mSv, respectively. Chest x-ray examination was the most examination used here (338 person). The average dose for each chest x-ray examination was 0.313 mSv. The average of cumulative absorbed dose among patients with fluoroscopic examination was about 12.6 mSv. The cumulative absorbed dose in 19 patients was more than 10 mSv.Conclusion: The average of cumulative absorbed dose was not more than the dose limit according to reference levels, but in comparison with other medical centers in the world is very high. Therefore, it is necessary to pay more attention to reduce radiological imaging procedures, particularly about fluoroscopic procedures.  

Keywords

References

  1. United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Sources aeoir. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations Scientific Committee; 2000.
  2. Karatzis EN, Danias PG. Exposure to ionizing radiation from cardiovascular imaging and therapeutic procedures may be a considerable unrecognized risk for subsequent cancer development. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5(6): 694-5.
  3. Zagoria RJ, Dixon RL. Radiology of urolithiasis: implications of radiation exposure and new imaging modalities. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2009; 16(1): 48-51.
  4. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176(2): 289-96.
  5. Eeg KR, Khoury AE, Halachmi S, Braga LH, Farhat WA, Bagli DJ, et al. Single center experience with application of the ALARA concept to serial imaging studies after blunt renal trauma in children--is ultrasound enough? J Urol 2009; 181(4): 1834-40.
  6. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(22): 2277-84.
  7. ICRP 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37(2-4).
  8. Mettler FA, Jr., Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008; 248(1): 254-63.
  9. Donadieu J, Zeghnoun A, Roudier C, Maccia C, Pirard P, Andre C, et al. Cumulative effective doses delivered by radiographs to preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2006; 117(3): 882-8.
  10. Wilson-Costello D, Rao PS, Morrison S, Hack M. Radiation exposure from diagnostic radiographs in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1996; 97(3): 369-74.
  11. Armpilia CI, Fife IA, Croasdale PL. Radiation dose quantities and risk in neonates in a special care baby unit. Br J Radiol 2002; 75(895): 590-5.
  12. Puch-Kapst K, Juran R, Stoever B, Wauer RR. Radiation exposure in 212 very low and extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2009; 124(6): 1556-64.
  13. European Commission. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in Paediatrics. EUR 16261 EN. Luxembourg: European Commission; 1996.
  14. Brindhaban A, Al Khalifah K. Radiation dose to premature infants in neonatal intensive care units in Kuwait. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2004; 111(3): 275-81.
  15. Pedrosa de Azevedo AC, Osibote AO, Bastos Boechat MC. Survey of doses and frequency of X-ray examinations on children at the intensive care unit of a large reference pediatric hospital. Appl Radiat Isot 2006; 64(12): 1637-42.
  16. Makri T, Yakoumakis E, Papadopoulou D, Gialousis G, Theodoropoulos V, Sandilos P, et al. Radiation risk assessment in neonatal radiographic examinations of the chest and abdomen: a clinical and Monte Carlo dosimetry study. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51(19): 5023-33.
  17. Brindhaban A, Eze CU. Estimation of radiation dose during diagnostic X-ray examinations of newborn babies and 1-year-old infants. Med Princ Pract 2006; 15(4): 260-5.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 29, Issue 140 - Serial Number 140
March and April 2011
Pages 626-633

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 November 2010
  • Revise Date:
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics