Strategies to Reduce Cheating on Online Exams

Letter to Editor

10.22122/jims.v39i615.13627

Abstract

Assessment of learners, due to its nature and complexity, is one of the most widespread and controversial educational topics. One of the threats in this process is cheating; cheating is a major concern for professors and institutions, especially when universities conduct exams online due to the Covid-19 pandemic. It means to consider the academic work of others in its place. Cheating can have a devastating effect on the performance, reputation, and longevity of an institution. When academic institutions do not have control over cheating, the result will be employers’ dissatisfaction with the graduates’ job performance. The first line of defense to prevent cheating is the adoption of ethical codes. In this regard, it is necessary to hold empowerment courses for teachers to train them to design appropriate questions. Other factors include setting a time limit for each question, designing questions with different arrangements, random distribution of questions, holding several midterm exams and reducing the volume of end-of-semester test resources, changing the scoring system to qualitative, matching the taught content with the exams, facilitate vague and complex lessons, project assessments, and reduce exams. The use of web-based cameras (webcams) as a technology-based solution to prevent cheating has also been suggested. Artificial intelligence and image processing, including special software, can also be used to monitor the student's body and face movements, and report suspicious behavior to the teacher. The use of Lockdown Browser also restricts the student's ability to search for resources during the test.

Keywords


Ofoghi N, Sadeghi A, Banapour hamidui MH, Emami SF. Qualitative analysis of the phenomenon of fraud or student misconduct from the perspective of professors and experts in charge of education in higher education institutions in Rasht. Iranian Journal of Higher Education 2017; 9(1): 57-82. [In Persian].
Kolb Kenneth H, Longest Kyle C, Singer Alexa J. Choosing not to cheat: A framework to assess students' rationales for abiding by academic integrity policies. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2015; 9(1): 9.
Yarmohammadzade P, Dadashzade M, Dadashzade V. Investigating the role of effective contextual factors in academic cheat in students. Research in Curriculum Planning 2016; 13(50): 126-35. [In Persian].
Dennick R, Wilkinson S, Purcell N. Online eAssessment: AMEE guide no. 39. Med Teach 2009; 31(3): 192-206.
Munoz A, Mackay J. An online testing design choice typology towards cheating threat minimization. J Univ Teach Learn Pract 2019; 16(3): 5.
Sarrayri MA, Ilyas M. Challenges of online exam, performances and problems for online university exam. Int J Comput Sci 2013; 10(1): 439-43.
Norris M. University online cheating - how to mitigate the damage. Res High Educ 2019; 37: 1-20.
Li M, Luo L, Sikdar S, Nizam NI, Gao S, Shan H, et al. Optimized collusion prevention for online exams during social distancing. NPJ Science of Learning 2021; 6(1): 5.