The Importance of Spike Timing and Rate in Merkel Mechanoreceptor Model

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medical Sciences and Technologies, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medical Sciences and Technologies, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Background: Tactile sensing plays an important role in our understanding of the environment. Mechanical arms, robots, and nerve prostheses perform better, if they have the sense of touch. Microneurography studies in humans have shown that primary afferent neurons (e.g. fingertip mechanoreceptors play an important role in encoding and separability with various types of stimuli using spike train patterns.Methods: We developed an experimental set up to simulate the responses of Merkel mechanoreceptors to force stimulation, with considering account receptor spiking behavior. Indeed, we used sensor data and spiking properties of Merkel mechanoreceptors to discriminate force. The analog tactile signals generated from sensor were fed as input to the Izhikevich neurons in order to obtain spike trains. The features of Spike trains were extracted with rate coding and timing coding. The desired features were assigned to the k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and support vector machine (SVM) to classify the types of forces.Findings: The highest classification accuracy achieved 100% with rate coding, 81.18% with inter-spike interval coefficient of variation (ISI CV), and 82% with victor-purpura distance (VPd). From the spike trains evoked during contact, we computed the information that rate and timing codes carried about applied force.Conclusion: Rate coding carried more force information than spike timing for Merkel mechanoreceptors. Moreover, as the force increased, firing rate also increased.

Keywords

References

  1. Tiwana MI, Redmond SJ, Lovell NH. A review of tactile sensing technologies with applications in biomedical engineering. Sens Actuators A Phys 2012; 179: 17-31.
  2. Abraira VE, Ginty DD. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron 2013; 79(4): 618-39.
  3. Greenspan JD, LaMotte RH. Cutaneous mechanoreceptors of the hand: Experimental studies and their implications for clinical testing of tactile sensation. J Hand Ther 1993; 6(2): 75-82.
  4. Chaudhuri A. Fundamentals of sensory perception. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2011.
  5. Vreeken J. Technical report UU-CS-2003-008. Spiking neural networks, an introduction [Online]. [cited 2003]; Available from: URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/techreps/repo/CS-2003/2003-008.pdf
  6. Maass W. Networks of spiking neurons: The third generation of neural network models. Neural Netw 1997; 10(9): 1659-71.
  7. DasGupta B, Schnitger G. The power of approximating: A comparison of activation functions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 1992; 5: 615-22.
  8. Thorpe S, Delorme A, Van Rullen R. Spike-based strategies for rapid processing. Neural Netw 2001; 14(6-7): 715-25.
  9. Yi Z, Zhang Y, Peters J. Bioinspired tactile sensor for surface roughness discrimination. Sens Actuators A Phys 2017; 255(C): 46-55.
  10. Rongala UB, Mazzoni A, Oddo CM. Neuromorphic artificial touch for categorization of naturalistic textures. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2017; 28(4): 819-29.
  11. Salimi-Nezhad N, Amiri M, Falotico E, Laschi C. A digital hardware realization for spiking model of cutaneous mechanoreceptor. Front Neurosci 2018; 12: 322.
  12. Zuo Y, Safaai H, Notaro G, Mazzoni A, Panzeri S, Diamond M. Complementary contributions of spike timing and spike rate to perceptual decisions in rat S1 and S2 cortex. Curr Biol 2015; 25(3): 357-63.
  13. Saal HP, Suresh AK, Solorzano LE, Weber AI, Bensmaia SJ. The effect of contact force on the responses of tactile nerve fibers to scanned textures. Neuroscience 2018; 389: 99-103.
  14. Bensmaia SJ, Denchev PV, Dammann JF 3rd, Craig JC, Hsiao SS. The representation of stimulus orientation in the early stages of somatosensory processing. J Neurosci 2008; 28(3): 776-86.
  15. Friedl KE, Voelker AR, Peer A, Eliasmith C. Human-inspired neurorobotic system for classifying surface textures by touch. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2016; 1(1): 516-23.
  16. Kim EK, Sugg KB, Langhals NB, Lightbody SM, Baltrusaitis ME, Urbanchek MG, et al. An engineered tactile afferent modulation platform to elicit compound sensory nerve action potentials in response to force magnitude. Proceedings of 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC); 2013 Apr 14-18; Daejeon, Korea. p. 241-6.
  17. Kim EK, Wellnitz SA, Bourdon SM, Lumpkin EA, Gerling GJ. Force sensor in simulated skin and neural model mimic tactile SAI afferent spiking response to ramp and hold stimuli. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9: 45.
  18. Izhikevich EM. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2003; 14(6): 1569-72.
  19. Furber SB, Lester DR, Plana LA, Garside JD, Painkras E, Temple S, et al. Overview of the SpiNNaker System Architecture. IEEE Trans Comput 2013; 62(12): 2454-67.
  20. Cover T, Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1967; 13(1): 21-7.
  21. Macleod ES, Luk A, Titterington DM. A Re-Examination of the Distance-Weighted k-Nearest Neighbor Classification Rule. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 1987; 17(4): 689-96.
  22. Zavrel J. An empirical re-examination of weighted voting for k-NN. Proceedings of the 7th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Machine Learning 1997 Oct 21; Tilburg, Netherland. p. 139-48.
  23. Burges CJC. Atutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 1998; 2(2): 121-67.
  24. Victor JD, Purpura K. Metric-space analysis of spike trains: Theory, algorithms and application. Network Comp Neural 1997; 8: 127-64.
  25. Panzeri S, Schultz SR, Treves A, Rolls ET. Correlations and the encoding of information in the nervous system. Proc Biol Sci 1999; 266(1423): 1001-12.
  26. Panzeri S, Treves A. Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures. Network 1996; 7(1): 87-107.
  27. Pola G, Thiele A, Hoffmann KP, Panzeri S. An exact method to quantify the information transmitted by different mechanisms of correlational coding. Network 2003; 14(1): 35-60.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 36, Issue 498 - Serial Number 498
September and October 2018
Pages 1156-1164

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 11 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics