Open Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy with Minimal Bleeding

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Resident, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Isfahan. Iran

2 Professor, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Isfahan. Iran

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhoid disorders are common diseases and treated by multiple therapies such as symptom relief by medication, outpatient procedures, and surgical interventions in operation room are used. Surgical interventions include open and closed techniques. In many countries Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) is the treatment of choice. The aim of present study was to introduce a new technique with minimal bleeding by primary ligation of hemorrhoidal vessels before hemorrhoidal tissue resection.Methods: Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids were randomly divided into intervention or control groups. All patients operated by a single surgeon. In intervention group new technique were applied and control group were operated by traditional MMH procedure. Amount of bleeding during operation, and presence of post operative urinary retention were recorded for each patient.Finding: Sixty two subjects were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to intervention (n = 31) and control group (n = 31) by mean ages of 46.3 and 43.5 years respectively. The mean number of intraoperative bloody gauzes in intervention group was 2.1 ± 0.9 compared with 4.4 ± 1.5 in control group (P < 0.001). Prevalence of retention among intervention and control group was 9.7% (n = 3) and 3.2% (n = 1) respectively (P = 0.31).Conclusion: Because intraoperative bleeding in the new technique is less than traditional MMH procedure (more than 50%), it is recommended that this procedure can lead to less blood loss and consequently shortened operation time and improve hemorrhoid resection by more visualization of surgical field.

Keywords


  1. Corman ML. Hemorrhoids. In: Brown B, McMillan E, LaPlante MM, Editors. Colon and rectal surgery. 5th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002. p. 177-248.
  2. Holley CJ. History of hemorrhoidal surgery. South Med J 1946; 39: 536-41.
  3. Thomson WJF. The nature of haemorrhoids. British Journal of Surgery 1975; 62(7): 542-52.
  4. Cintron J, Abcarian H. Benign anorectal Hemorrhoids. In: Wolff BG, Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Editors. The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. New York: Springer, 2007. p. 156-177.
  5. Morgado PJ, Suarez JA, Gomez LG, Morgado PJ. Histoclinical basis for a new classification of hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31(6): 474-80.
  6. Senagore A, Mazier WP, Luchtefeld MA, MacKeigan JM, Wengert T. Treatment of ad-vanced hemorrhoidal disease: a prospective, randomized comparison of cold scalpel vs. contact Nd: YAG laser. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36(11): 1042-9.
  7. Gencosmanoglu R, Sad O, Koc D, Inceoglu R. Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45(1): 70-5.
  8. Sohn VY, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Cuadrado DG, Place RJ, Steele SR. A comparison of open versus closed techniques using the Harmonic Scalpel in outpatient hemorrhoid surgery. Mil Med 2008; 173(7): 689-92.
  9. Stolfi VM, Sileri P, Micossi C, Carbonaro I, Venza M, Gentileschi P, et al. Treatment of hemorrhoids in day surgery: stapled hemor-rhoidopexy vs Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12(5): 795-801.
  10. Ceci F, Picchio M, Palimento D, Cali B, Corelli S, Spaziani E. Long-term outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51(7): 1107-12.
  11. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic he-morrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35(5): 477-81.