Comparison of Postoperative Bleeding and Delayed Gastric Emptying after the Whipple Surgery in Two Methods of Classic and Pylorus-Preserving in Patients Undergone Pancreaticoduodenectomy; A 5-Year Survey

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Student of Medicine, Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Despite the high use of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic cancers of the head, and the introduction of various surgical techniques, few studies have been done to investigate the complications and consequences of new surgery methods, especially pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare postoperative bleeding and delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing Whipple surgery in classical and pylorus-preserving methods.Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 94 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were studied, 53 patients with classical and 41 patients with PPPD method. The required information, including the type of surgery and its complications, were collected from patients' files, and contact with patients. Chi-square and t tests were used to compare the data.Findings: PPPD surgery had lower bleeding during surgery (801.34 versus 510.00 cc) (P < 0.001) and lower hospitalization duration (P = 0.027). However, there was no difference in postoperative bleeding (P < 0.050). Regarding the delay in gastric emptying during admission, although in the PPPD group was lower, but it was not statistically different (P = 0.255).Conclusion: In patients with surgical indication due to pancreatic cancers of the head, who are candidates for Whipple surgery, priority should be given to PPPD surgery, which reduces the need for blood during surgery, and the duration of hospitalization.

Keywords

References

  1. McEvoy SH, Lavelle LP, Hoare SM, O'Neill AC, Awan FN, Malone DE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Expected post-operative anatomy and complications. Br J Radiol 2014; 87(1041): 20140050.
  2. Tani M, Terasawa H, Kawai M, Ina S, Hirono S, Uchiyama K, et al. Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 243(3): 316-20.
  3. Ball CG, Dixon E, Vollmer CM, Howard TJ. The view from 10,000 procedures: technical tips and wisdom from master pancreatic surgeons to avoid hemorrhage during pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Surg 2015; 15: 122.
  4. Saraee A, Vahedian-Ardakani J, Saraee E, Pakzad R, Wadji MB. Whipple procedure: A review of a 7-year clinical experience in a referral center for hepatobiliary and pancreas diseases. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 98.
  5. Paraskevas KI, Avgerinos C, Manes C, Lytras D, Dervenis C. Delayed gastric emptying is associated with pylorus-preserving but not classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: A review of the literature and critical reappraisal of the implicated pathomechanism. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(37): 5951-8.
  6. Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Kazemier G, Hop WC, Greve JW, et al. Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 2004; 240(5): 738-45.
  7. Huttner FJ, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Buchler MW, et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2: CD006053.
  8. Taher MA, Khan ZR, Chowdhury MM, Nur-E-Elahi, Chowdhury AK, Faruque MS, et al. Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy vs. Standard Whipple's Procedure in Case of Carcinoma head of the Pancreas and Periampullary Carcinoma. Mymensingh Med J 2015; 24(2): 319-25.
  9. Zhou Y, Lin L, Wu L, Xu D, Li B. A case-matched comparison and meta-analysis comparing pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying. HPB (Oxford ) 2015; 17(4): 337-43.
  10. Diener MK, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Huttner FJ, Antes G, et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (11): CD006053.
  11. Yang C, Wu HS, Chen XL, Wang CY, Gou SM, Xiao J, et al. Pylorus-preserving versus pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9(3): e90316.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 36, Issue 483 - Serial Number 483
May and June 2018
Pages 658-665

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 April 2018
  • Revise Date: 23 May 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics