The Trend of Intra-Hospital Mortality Rate in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock (STEMI-CS) Over One Decade, and Association with New Therapeutic Approaches

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2 Student of Medicine, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI-CS) between 2009 and 2018, and its association with new therapeutic modalities.Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients with STEMI-CS from 2009 to 2018 in Shahid Madani Heart Center in northwest of Iran were enrolled (n = 410). Patients were classified into two five-year periods based on the year of admission, 162 patients in the first period (2009-2013) and 248 patients in the second period (2014-2018) were included in this study. Demographic data, risk factors, clinical symptoms, treatment strategies, and in-hospital mortality were compared between the two periods.Findings: Therapeutic approaches including thrombolysis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PTI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and intra-aortic balloon pump were similar between two periods, and the only significant difference in treatment was the higher rate of using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in the second period (20.2% vs. 43.9%, respectively; P = 0.001). However, higher in-hospital mortality rate was found in 2009-2013 period compared to 2014-2018 period (80.8% vs. 69.7%, respectively; P = 0.010). Multivariate regression analysis showed that only coronary revascularization, either percutaneous or CABG, were independently associated with a lower mortality risk (Odds ratio of 0.26 and 0.21, respectively; P < 0.001 for both).Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the therapeutic approaches in patients with STEMI-CS did not improve significantly over one decade, and most patients did not undergo coronary revascularization.

References

  1. Poss J, Koster J, Fuernau G, Eitel I, de Waha S, Ouarrak T, et al. Risk stratification for patients in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69(15): 1913-20.
  2. Hunziker L, Radovanovic D, Jeger R, Pedrazzini G, Cuculi F, Urban P, et al. Twenty-year trends in the incidence and outcome of cardiogenic shock in AMIS plus registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12(4): e007293.
  3. Jentzer JC, Chonde MD, Dezfulian C. Myocardial dysfunction and shock after cardiac arrest. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 314796.
  4. Thiele H, Ohman EM, Desch S, Eitel I, de Waha S. Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 2015; 36(20): 1223-30.
  5. Islam MS, Panduranga P, Al-Mukhaini M, Al-Riyami A, El-Deeb M, Rahman SA, et al. In-hospital outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: Results from Royal Hospital Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry, Oman. Oman Med J 2016; 31(1): 46-51.
  6. Harjola VP, Lassus J, Sionis A, Kober L, Tarvasmaki T, Spinar J, et al. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2015; 17(5): 501-9.
  7. Shah AH, Puri R, Kalra A. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A review. Clin Cardiol 2019; 42(4): 484-93.
  8. Truesdell AG, Tehrani B, Singh R, Desai S, Saulino P, Barnett S, et al. 'Combat' approach to cardiogenic shock. Interv Cardiol 2018; 13(2): 81-6.
  9. Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, Fuernau G, de Waha S, Meyer-Saraei R, et al. PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2017; 377(25): 2419-32.
  10. Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, Charbonnier B, Schiele F, Lefevre T, et al. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: A report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(20): 2535-43.
  11. Garcia-Garcia C, Oliveras T, El ON, Rueda F, Serra J, Labata C, et al. Short- and long-term mortality trends in stemi-cardiogenic shock over three decades (1989-2018): The Ruti-STEMI-Shock Registry. J Clin Med 2020; 9(8): 2398.
  12. De Luca L, Olivari Z, Farina A, Gonzini L, Lucci D, Di Chiara A, et al. Temporal trends in the epidemiology, management, and outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes. Eur J Heart Fail 2015; 17(11): 1124-32.
  13. Helgestad OKL, Josiassen J, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Holmvang L, Sorensen A, et al. Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: A Danish cohort study. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21(11): 1370-8.
  14. Hashmi KA, Abbas K, Hashmi AA, Irfan M, Edhi MM, Ali N, et al. In-hospital mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction; impact of early revascularization. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11(1): 721.
  15. Acharya D. Predictors of outcomes in myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Cardiol Rev 2018; 26(5): 255-66.
  16. Fengler K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Neumann FJ, Olbrich HG, et al. Gender differences in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial. Clin Res Cardiol 2015; 104(1): 71-8.
  17. Bandyopadhyay D, Devanabanda AR, Tummala R, Chakraborty S, Hajra A, Amgai B, et al. Effect of diabetic ketoacidosis on the outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An analysis of national inpatient sample. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2019; 24: 100384.
  18. Dauriz M, Morici N, Gonzini L, Lucci D, Di CA, Boccanelli A, et al. Fifteen-year trends of cardiogenic shock and mortality in patients with diabetes and acute coronary syndromes. Am J Med 2020; 133(3): 331-9.
  19. Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow HD, Abbott JD, Bhatt DL, et al. Diabetes mellitus and cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2018; 131(7): 778-86.
  20. Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Juilliere Y, Jourdain P, Blanchard D, Schiele F, et al. Fifteen-year trends in the management of cardiogenic shock and associated 1-year mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: The FAST-MI programme. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18(9): 1144-52.
  21. Shi WY, Smith JA. Role of Coronary artery bypass surgery in acute myocardial infarction. In: Watson TJ, Ong PJL, Tcheng JE, editors. Primary angioplasty: A practical guide [Internet]. Singapore: Springer; 2018. 2018; p. 211-21.
  22. Sanchez-Salado JC, Burgos V, Ariza-Sole A, Sionis A, Canteli A, Bernal JL, et al. Trends in cardiogenic shock management and prognostic impact of type of treating center. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2020; 73(7): 546-53.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 16 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 26 May 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics