The Outcomes of Different Methods of Surgical Excisions and Liposuction in Patients Suffering from Gynecomastia

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Medical Student, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor. Department of Surgery, Medical School, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Surgical treatment for gynecomastia correction in men combines liposuction and surgical excision. The present study was conducted to compare the outcomes after surgery and liposuction in patients with a history of gynecomasti.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, the data in the files of 92 patients in Isfahan Plastic Surgery Clinic who underwent gynecomastia correction surgery alone or combined with liposuction, in terms of gynecomastia grade, type of surgical technique (Webster, Lolande, LeJour, and Inverted-T excision), postoperative complications, wound scar score, patient satisfaction score, and expert panel satisfaction were analyzed at intervals of one month to 12 months.
Findings: 5 (5.4%) of the patients in grade II A, 42 (45.7%) in grade II B, and 45 (48.9%) in grade III gynecomastia underwent surgery. The most common surgical technique used in grade IIA and IIB patients was the Webster technique and, in grade III, the Lolande (Dermoglandular) technique. The most common postoperative complications observed include breast flattening, paraesthesia, and nipple numbness. More than a quarter of the patients experienced a recurrence of gynecomastia. The most complications occurred after using the Webster technique and in the group of patients with grade III gynecomastia. The patients who were operated on with the Lejour technique and the Lolande technique (Dermoglandular) showed significantly the highest and lowest scar scores, respectively.
Conclusion: In gynecomastia correction surgery, the use of the Lolande (Dermoglandular) surgical technique resulted in the lowest frequencies of either complications or scar scores.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Swerdloff RS, Ng JCM, Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, et al. Gynecomastia: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.
  2. Braunstein GD. Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(12): 1229-37.
  3. Cuhaci N, Polat SB, Evranos B, Ersoy R, Cakir B. Gynecomastia: clinical evaluation and management. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2014; 18(2): 150-8.
  4. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51(1): 48-52.
  5. Choi BS, Lee SR, Byun GY, Hwang SB, Koo BH. The characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of adolescent gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41(5): 1011-21.
  6. Agrawal S, Ganie MA, Nisar S. Gynaecomastia. Basics of Human Andrology: A Textbook. 2017: 451-8.
  7. Charles M. Malata KYW. Gunecomastia surgery. In: Neligan PC, editor. Plastic Surgery. 4th ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. p. 174-94.
  8. McNamara CT, Nuzzi LC, Firriolo JM, Walsh LR, Massey GG, Malloy SM, et al. Complications and quality of life following gynecomastia correction in adolescents and young men. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149(6): 1062e-70e.
  9. Handschin A, Bietry D, Hüsler R, Banic A, Constantinescu M. Surgical management of gynecomastia—a 10-year analysis. World J Surg 2008; 32(1): 38-44.
  10. Longheu A, Medas F, Corrias F, Farris S, Tatti A, Pisano G, et al. Surgical management of gynecomastia: experience of a general surgery center. G Chir 2016; 37(4): 150-4.
  11. Innocenti A, Melita D, Dreassi E. Incidence of Complications for Different Approaches in Gynecomastia Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Aesth Plast Surg 2022; 46(3): 1025-41.
  12. Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Friedman JD, Echo A. Complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41(4): 761-7.
  13. Knox AD, Ho AL, Leung L, Hynes S, Tashakkor AY, Park YS, et al. A review of 101 consecutive subcutaneous mastectomies and male chest contouring using the concentric circular and free nipple graft techniques in female-to-male transgender patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139(6): 1260e-72e.