The Last Mile in the Rational Prescription: The Application of Behavioral Economics in the Design of the Electronic Prescribing System

Document Type : Letter to Editor

Authors

1 Association Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, AND Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 PhD Student, Student Research Committee, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

10.48305/jims.v43.i813..0426

Abstract

The rational prescription of medications can prevent complications and decrease healthcare systems and patient costs. For this purpose, many administrative, legal, and educational interventions have been carried out in different countries. These initiatives have been able to control the irrational prescription to some extent. Behavioral economics tries to persuade people to change their behavior without using coercion. The most essential tool of this new branch of economics is identifying predictable cognitive biases and trying to reduce their effect. Various interventions are carried out in the world for the rational prescription of drugs using behavioral economics. The current study reviews four interventions: changing the default option, peer group effect, suggested alternatives, and accountable justification. It seems that due to the widespread use of electronic prescribing systems, these methods can lead to the improvement of the rational prescription of drugs in the country. Although behavioral economics interventions cannot be a substitute for education, legislation, and other current activities, they can be considered a complement to behavior change.

Highlights

Maryam Moeeni: Google Scholar, PubMed

Mohammad Ali Jalilvand: Google Scholar, PubMed

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Persell SD, Doctor JN, Friedberg MW, Meeker D, Friesema E, Cooper A, et al. Behavioral interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing: a randomized pilot trial. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16: 373.
  2. Askari MY, Refae GAE. The rationality of irrational decisions: a new perspective of behavioural economics. Int J Econ Bus Res 2019; 17(4): 388-401.
  3. Johnson EJ, Shu SB, Dellaert BG, Fox C, Goldstein DG, Häubl G, et al. Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice Mark Lett 2012; 23: 487-504.
  4. Thaler RH. Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company; 2016.
  5. Thaler RH. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health. Wealth and Happiness/Yale. London, UK: Penguin Books; 2008.
  6. Wang SY, Groene O. The effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed interventions on physician behavioral change: a systematic literature review. PLoS One 2020; 15(6): e0234149.
  7. Meeker D, Linder JA, Fox CR, Friedberg MW, Persell SD, Goldstein NJ, et al. Effect of behavioral interventions on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among primary care practices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 315(6): 562-70.

Mullainathan S. Solving social problems with a nudge. Presentation given at the TED conference in India; 2009 Available from"https://www.ted.com/talks/sendhil_mullainathan_solving_social_problems_with_a_nudge