Investigation of Computer Vision Syndrome and Its Relationship with Lighting Conditions in Medical University Staff

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

2 Undergraduate Student, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Student Research Committee, Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences, Esfarayen, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences, Esfarayen, Iran

10.48305/jims.v43.i826.0948

Abstract

Background: The work environment can have a significant impact on Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). This study investigates the relationship between CVS and the lighting conditions in the workplace among healthcare staff.
Methods: The study's sample consisted of 200 employees from the Faculty of Medical Sciences in Esfarayen. To assess workplace lighting conditions, the Hagner Screen Master device was used. The measured parameters included workspace illuminance and the luminance ratio of the display screen to its surrounding environment, with the obtained results compared to international standards. A Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) questionnaire was used to collect symptoms related to visual problems. The data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney and Spearman correlation).
Findings: The mean age and work experience of the participants were 36.66 years and 10.75 years, respectively. The average score on the Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) questionnaire was 7.69, with 62.2% of participants being affected by the syndrome. The most common symptoms were dry eyes (71.5%) and eye redness (68%). 54.5% of the workstations had standard illuminance levels at the desk surface. Additionally, 64.5% of the workstations had an inappropriate luminance ratio. A significant correlation was found between CVS and lighting conditions, duration of screen time, age, and work experience.
Conclusion: The results of the study indicated that administrative employees are at risk of Computer Vision Syndrome, and the severity of symptoms increases with longer working hours and inadequate lighting. Optimizing workplace lighting could help reduce these symptoms.

Highlights

Seyed Hojat Mousavi Kordmiri: Google Scholar

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Kamal P, Rajat B. Computer Vision Syndrome: A Rural College Based Pilot Survey. Headache. 2020; 10(5): 13-6.
  2. Ellahi A, Khalil MS, Akram F. Computer users at risk: Health disorders associated with prolonged computer use. J Bus Econ Manag 2011; 2(4): 171-82.
  3. Anbesu EW, Lema AK. Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2023; 13(1): 1801.
  4. Shrestha N, Yadav RD, Shrestha P, Pokhrel AS. Computer vision syndrome among medical and engineering students, Rupandehi, Nepal. Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences 2022; 10(01): 67-70.
  5. Sheppard AL, Wolffsohn JS. Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2018; 3(1): e000146.
  6. Ccami-Bernal F, Soriano-Moreno DR, Romero-Robles MA, Barriga-Chambi F, Tuco KG, Castro-Diaz SD, et al. Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Optom 2024;17(1):100482.
  7. Boadi-Kusi SB, Abu SL, Acheampong GO, Adueming PO-W, Abu EK. Association between poor ergophthalmologic practices and computer vision syndrome among university administrative staff in Ghana. J Environ Public Health 2020; 2020: 7516357.
  8. Juslén H, Tenner A. Mechanisms involved n enhancing human performance by changing the lighting in the industrial workplace. Int J Ind Ergon 2005;35(9):843-55.
  9. Lin CJ, Feng W-Y, Chao C-J, Tseng F-Y. Effects of VDT Workstation Lighting Conditions on Operator Visual Workload. Industrial Health 2008; 46(2): 105-11.
  10. Rautkylä E, Puolakka M, Halonen L. Alerting effects of daytime light exposure – a proposed link between light exposure and brain mechanisms. Light Res Technol 2011; 44(2): 238-52.
  11. Katabaro JM, Yan Y. Effects of lighting quality on working efficiency of workers in office building in Tanzania. J Environ Public Health 2019.
  12. Durgut M. The Effects of lighting conditions on visual comfort, satisfaction and motivation levels of architecture students: Izmir Institute of Technology (Turkey); 2021. Availale from: https://gcris.iyte.edu.tr/server/api/core/bitstreams/cc73693e-6c42-43a6-85f2-a02a24328973/content
  13. Boyce PR. Light, lighting and human health. Lighting Research Technology 2022; 54(2): 101-44.
  14. Vetter C, Pattison PM, Houser K, Herf M, Phillips AJ, Wright KP, et al. A review of human physiological responses to light: implications for the development of integrative lighting solutions. Leukos 2022; 18(3): 387-414.
  15. Hadi A, Haghighatnia H, Hesami A, Rasoulzadeh Y. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire. J Health Saf Work 2023; 13(1): 77-89.
  16. Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome (aka digital eye strain). Optometry in Practice 2016; 17(1).
  17. Bali J, Navin N, Thakur BR. Computer vision syndrome: a study of the knowledge, attitudes and practices in Indian ophthalmologists. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007; 55(4): 289-93.
  18. Golmohammadi R, Pirmoradi Z, Torghabeh MM, Fardmal J. Lighting and color temperature assessment in the office workplaces and relationship to visual fatigue [in Persian]. Iran Occupational Health 2020; 17(1): 1-10.
  19. Sheedy JE, Smith R, Hayes J. Visual effects of the luminance surrounding a computer display. Ergonomics 2005; 48(9): 1114-28.
  20. Azimi Khorasani A, Sharifi F, Zandi F. Computer vision syndrome [in Persian]. Bina J Ophthal 2013; 18(4): 452-8.
  21. Mazloumi A, Pourbabaki R, Samiei S. Studying factors influencing eye indicators of computer users: A systematic review [in Persian]. Journal of Health and Safety at Work 2019; 9(3): 231-40.
  22. Agarwal S, Goel D, Sharma A. Evaluation of the factors which contribute to the ocular complaints in computer users. J Clin Diagn Res 2012; 7(2): 331-5.
  23. Cantó-Sancho N, Porru S, Casati S, Ronda E, Seguí-Crespo M, Carta A. Prevalence and risk factors of computer vision syndrome—assessed in office workers by a validated questionnaire. PeerJ 2023; 11: e14937.
  24. Ranasinghe P, Wathurapatha W, Perera Y, Lamabadusuriya D, Kulatunga S, Jayawardana N, Katulanda P. Computer vision syndrome among computer office workers in a developing country: an evaluation of prevalence and risk factors. BMC Res Notes 2016; 9: 150.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 43, Issue 826
2nd Week, October
September and October 2025
Pages 948-955

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 February 2025
  • Accept Date: 25 October 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics