بررسی فراوانی نسبی زایمان بی درد و تعیین علل پذیرش یا عدم پذیرش آن در مادران باردار مراجعه‌کننده به بیمارستان شهید بهشتی اصفهان

نوع مقاله : Original Article(s)

نویسندگان

1 گروه بیهوشی، دانشکده‌ی پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان اصفهان، ایران

2 مرکز تحقیقات بیهوشی و مراقبت‌های ویژه، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان اصفهان، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه زنان و زایمان، دانشکده‌ی پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

4 دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

10.48305/jims.v43.i825.0912

چکیده

مقاله پژوهشی




مقدمه: زایمان بدون درد، همواره به علت تفاوت در فرهنگ‌ها، مذهب و اعتقادات در شهرهای مختلف، با پذیرش یا عدم پذیرش توسط زن باردار یا خانواده وی روبرو می‌شود. مطالعه‌ی حاضر با هدف تعیین علل پذیرش یا عدم پذیرش آن در مادران باردار مراجعه‌کننده به بیمارستان شهید بهشتی شهر اصفهان در سال 1402 انجام شد.
روش‌ها: مطالعه‌ی حاضر از نوع توصیفی- مقطعی بود که در لیبر بیمارستان شهید بهشتی شهر اصفهان و در سال 1402 انجام شد. جامعه‌ی مورد بررسی شامل مادران بارداری بود که در طی 5 ماه کاندید زایمان طبیعی بودند و 384 نفر به صورت نمونه‌گیری آسان وارد مطالعه شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها چک‌لیست بود که بصورت مصاحبه از زنان مورد پرسش قرار گرفت و در سطح معنی‌داری کمتر از 0/05 مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: از مهم‌ترین علل عدم تمایل به زایمان بی‌درد، ترس از عوارض (13/6 درصد)، توانایی تحمل درد (13/1 درصد) و عدم رضایت از تجربه‌ی قبلی خود / دیگران (4/9 درصد) بوده است. همچنین بر اساس نتایج بدست آمده تنها بین سن مادر (کمتر از 35 سال) در زمان زایمان با تمایل به زایمان بی‌درد ارتباط معنی‌دار مشاهده شد (0/05 > 0/010 = P).
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به آنکه حدود نیمی از مادران باردار اصلاً تمایلی به انجام زایمان بی‌درد نداشتند، بنابراین بایستی اقدامات و راهکارهای لازم را درخصوص ارائه‌ی آگاهی از این نوع زایمان، انجام داد.

تازه های تحقیق

عاطفه قصوری:  Google Scholar 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessing Relative Abundance Acceptance of Pregnant Women About Painless Delivery and the Reasons of Reject or Acceptance in Patients Referred to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Isfahan

نویسندگان [English]

  • Atefeh Ghosouri 1
  • Alireza Hoghooghi 1
  • Behzad Nazemroaya 2
  • Safoura Rouholamin 3
  • Narjes Raufimanesh 4
  • Mehrdad Noroozi 1
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Anesthesiology and Clinical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4 Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: Painless delivery is always met with acceptance or non-acceptance by the pregnant woman or her family due to differences in cultures, religions and beliefs across different cities. The present study was conducted to determine the reasons for its acceptance or non-acceptance in pregnant mothers referring to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Isfahan in 2023-2024.
Methods: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study that was conducted in the labor ward of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Isfahan in 2023-2024. The study population included pregnant mothers who were candidates for vaginal delivery within 5 months, and 384 participants were included in the study through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a checklist administered via interview and analyzed with a significance level of P < 0.05.
Findings: One of the most important reasons for refusing painless delivery was the fear of complications (13.6%), the ability to tolerate pain (13.1%), and dissatisfaction with personal or others’ previous experiences (4.9%). Also, based on the results obtained, a significant relationship was observed only between the maternal age (under 35 years) at the time of delivery and the desire for a painless delivery (P = 0.010 < 0.05).
Conclusion: Considering that about half of the pregnant women were not willing to have a painless delivery at all, it is necessary to take appropriate measures and strategies to increase awareness about this delivery method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Labor pain
  • Cesarean section
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnant women
  • Attitude
  1. Olza I, Leahy-Warren P, Benyamini Y, Kazmierczak M, Karlsdottir SI, Spyridou A, et al. Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis. BMJ Open 2018; 8(10): e020347.
  2. Hosseinzadeh F, Hamidi Madani Z, Shahrokhi Rad R, Soltanipour S, Rafiei Sorouri Z, Biazar G, et al. Maternal Attitude and Knowledge Regarding Painless Labor: A Report from a Referral Hospital in Northern Iran. Anesth Pain Med 2023; 13(5): e139079.
  3. Nori W, Kassim Kassim M, Raad Helmi Z, Cosmin Pantazi A, Brezeanu D, Brezeanu AM, et al. Non-pharmacological pain management in labor: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2023; 12(23): 7203.
  4. Anim‐Somuah M, Smyth R, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non‐epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 2018(5): CD000331.
  5. Chang CY, Gau ML, Huang CJ, Cheng HM. Effects of non-pharmacological coping strategies for reducing labor pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17(1): e0261493.
  6. Ugwu N. Why effective pain management remains a challenge. [2020] Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/73164
  7. Moradi F, Aryankhesal A, Heidari M, Soroush A, Rahimi Sadr S. Interventions in Reducing Caesarean Section in the World: A Systematic Review. Malays J Med Sci 2019; 26(5): 21–37.
  8. Hall DE, Prochazka AV, Fink AS. Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ. 2012; 184(5): 533–40.
  9. Elgzar WT, Alshahrani MS, Ibrahim HAF. Mode of delivery preferences: the role of childbirth fear among nulliparous women. Front Psychol 2023; 14: 1221133.
  10. Alabdullah HA, Ismael L, Alshehri LA, Alqahtani S, Alomari M, Alammar A, et al. The prevalence of C-section delivery and its associated factors among Saudi women attending different clinics of King Khalid University Hospital. Cureus 2021; 13(1): e12774.
  11. Hidaka R, Clark Callister L. Giving birth with epidural analgesia: the experience of first-time mothers. J Perinat Educ 2012; 21(1): 24–35.
  12. Ghanbari-Homaie S, Jenani SP, Faraji-Gavgani L, Hosenzadeh P, Rezaei M. Association between epidural analgesia and postpartum psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. Heliyon 2024; 10(6): e27717.
  13. de Oliveira Silva CB, Davi Rodrigues KM, Zoldan C, Yamamoto Nomura R M, Júnior EA, Peixoto AB. Nonpharmacological Methods to Reduce Pain During Active Labor in A Real-life Setting. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2023; 45(1): 3–10.
  14. Zhang J, Yancey MK, Klebanoff MA, Schwarz J, Schweitzer D. Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185(1): 128-34.
  15. Rafiei M, Saei Ghare M, Akbari M. Prevalence, causes, and complications of cesarean delivery in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed 2018; 16(4): 221–34.
  16. Shokrpour M, Pour Seyed Reza P, Sharifi M, Kamali A. Prevalence of cesarean section and analysis of neonatal apgar score and the mean time of second phase of labor in pregnant women. Med Arch 2019; 73(6): 399–403.
  17. Sen Tan H, Agarthesh T, Wen Tan C, Sultana R, Chen HY, Chua TE, et al. Perceived stress during labor and its association with depressive symptomatology, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1): 17005.
  18. Hosseinzadeh F, Hamidi Madani Z, Shahrokhi Rad R, Soltanipour S, Rafiei Sorouri Z, Biazar G, et al. Maternal attitude and knowledge regarding painless labor: a report from a referral hospital in Northern Iran. Anesth Pain Med 2023; 13(5): e139079.
  19. Størksen HT, Garthus-Niegel S, Vangen S, Eberhard-Gran M. The impact of previous birth experiences on maternal fear of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92(3): 318-24.
  20. Sluijs A, Cleiren MPH, van Lith JMM, Wijma B, Wijma K. Is fear of childbirth related to the woman's preferred location for giving birth? A Dutch low-risk cohort study. Birth 2020; 47(1): 144-52.
  21. Aksoy M, Nur Aksoy A, Dostbil A, Celik MG, Ince I. The relationship between fear of childbirth and women's knowledge about painless childbirth. Obstet Gynecol Int 2014: 2014: 274303.
  22. Geissbuehler V, Eberhard J. Fear of childbirth during pregnancy: a study of more than 8000 pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Dec;23(4):229-35.
  23. Naithani R, Dayal N, Chopra A, Sundar J. Fetal outcome in pregnancy with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Indian J Pediatr 2016; 83(7): 752-3.
  24. Olayemi O, Bello FA, Aimakhu CO, Obajimi GO, Adekunle AO. Male participation in pregnancy and delivery in Nigeria: a survey of antenatal attendees. J Biosoc Sci 2009; 41(4): 493-503.
  25. Li X, Wu C, Zhou X, Zhang J, Lu H, Chen S, et al. Influence of painless delivery on the maternal and neonatal outcomes under the guidance of new concept of labor. Am J Transl Res 2021; 13(11): 12973-9.
  26. Larijani SS, Niksolat M, Mirfakhraee H, Rahimi M, Asadi S, Mahdavynia S, et al. Comparison of the outcomes of normal vaginal delivery with and without spinal anesthesia in mothers admitted to the maternity ward of Firoozabadi Hospital. J Family Med Prim Care 2022; 11(9): 5633-7.
  27. Osterman MJK, Martin JA. Timing and Adequacy of Prenatal Care in the United States, 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018; 67(3): 1-14.
  28. Li X, Wu C, Zhou X, Zhang J, Lu H, Chen S, et al. Influence of painless delivery on the maternal and neonatal outcomes under the guidance of new concept of labor. Am J Transl Res 2021; 13(11): 12973-9.