Document Type : Original Article(s)
                            
                        
                                                    Authors
                            
                                                            
                                                                            1
                                                                        Associate Professor of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahsn, Iran                                
                                                            
                                                                            2
                                                                        Community Medicine, School of pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.                                
                                                            
                                                                            3
                                                                        Associate Professor of Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran                                
                            
                                                
                        
                            Abstract
                            Abstract   Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) is one of the most   common problems during pregnancy. In our public health system, screening of   ABU by urinalysis (UA) is free for all pregnant women but urine culture (UC)   is more sensitive and specific than UA. Determination of condition to   screening asymptomatic bacteriuria with urine culture was the main field of   the study.         Background:             200 pregnant women in two groups were screened by   Dipstick UA and UC. Costs (6) were calculated per groups, and prevented   symptomatic bacteriuria was considered as effectiveness (E). Proportion of   C/E was estimated. Sensitivity analysis was performed over wide ranges of   prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB).         Methods:             Prevalence of   bacteriuria was 4 percent. Direct costs in leukocyte esterase- nitrite   dipstick group were 723600 Rials and in leukocyte esterase- nitrite dipstick   + urine culture group were 1788800 Rials. The incremental costs in first   group were 70200 Rials and cost savings in second group were 46800 Rials. The   prevention ratio in first group was 55 percent, and in urinalysis +urine   culture was 100 percent. The   cost- effectiveness ratio in first group was 1.3 and in second group was 1.7.   In sensitivity analysis, if prevalence of ASB was 13 percent،   -effectiveness of these strategies were equal and if prevalence was 14   percent and higher, the cost- effectiveness with leukocyte esterase- nitrite   dipstick+ urine culture was lower than leukocyte esterase- nitrite dipstick   group.         Findings:             According to our findings, prevalence of ABU was   low, screening of ABU by UA in public system is cost/effective at the present   situation, but epidemiologic trend study is necessary to make decision about   screening tools.         Conclusion:             Isfahan, ABU, screening, cost-effectiveness,   urine culture, urine analysis, pregnancy.         Key   words: