Improving Iran’s COVID-19 Response: Lessons from Comparative Experiences Health Systems

Document Type : policy brief

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Emergency and Disaster Health, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Emergency and Disaster Health, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 PhD Candidate in Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Medical Informatics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Management, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

6 Alzahra Educational and Medical Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

10.48305/jims.v43.i823.0834

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, as an unprecedented global crisis, has tested health systems around the world and highlighted the need to review national response plans. This policy brief, with the aim of providing practical solutions for improving Iran’s COVID-19 response, is based on the findings of a comparative-analytical study of the experiences of five selected countries: Australia, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The findings show that the effectiveness of interventions is related to the implementation context, the quality of management, and the ability to attract community participation. The analysis of these countries’ experiences highlighted important policy options, including mandatory mask use, the deployment of contact tracing systems, the implementation of smart quarantines, investment in primary care, and transparency in information provision.
However, the implementation considerations and potential barriers to each of these strategies, from cultural and infrastructure challenges to privacy issues and structural constraints, require serious planning. For example, the success of strategies such as “contact tracing” depends on a high level of public trust, which is built through transparency and honesty. Accordingly, the final prioritization of strategies for the Iranian context is presented based on the basic requirements for building resilience. In this regard, “establishing transparent governance and integrated information” are identified as a fundamental building block and “strengthening the primary health care system” as a key long-term strategy. These two strategies enable the effective implementation of other short- and medium-term interventions, such as mandatory mask wearing and situational quarantines. This document introduces the need to invest in public trust and basic health infrastructure to achieve a resilient health system with a preventive approach.

Highlights

Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian: Google Scholar

Golrokh Atighechian: Google Scholar

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Pollard CA, Morran MP, Nestor-Kalinoski AL. The COVID-19 pandemic: a global health crisis. Physiol Genomics 2020; 52(11): 549-57.
  2. Shim E, Tariq A, Choi W, Lee Y, Chowell G. Transmission potential and severity of COVID-19 in South Korea. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 93: 339-44.
  3. Mohammad Naghi N, Rezvan MT. Evaluating the Health Systems Efficiency of Countries Infected by COVID-19 Using Window Data Envelopment Analysis, Malmquist Productivity Index, and Data Envelopment Analysis with Non-Controllable Input Variables [in Persian]. Research in Production and Operations Management 2023; 14(3): 65-90.‎
  4. Vaezi, Mirzaei, Ashraf, Pouramini. Corona Crisis: Iran in the Mirror of Test: A Comparative Approach [in Persian]. Journal of the Iranian Management Sciences Association 2021; 16(62): 117-46.‎
  5. Mellish TI, Luzmore NJ, Shahbaz AA. Why were the UK and USA unprepared for the COVID-19 pandemic? The systemic weaknesses of neoliberalism: a comparison between the UK, USA, Germany, and South Korea. Journal of Global Faultlines 2020; 7(1): 9-45.
  6. Volk S. Political performances of control during COVID-19: Controlling and contesting democracy in Germany. Frontiers in Political Science 2021; 3: 654069.
  7. Yan B, Zhang X, Wu L, Zhu H, Chen B. Why do countries respond differently to COVID-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan. Am Rev Public Adm 2020; 50(6-7): 762-9.
Volume 43, Issue 823
3rd Week, September: Policy Brief
September and October 2025
Pages 834-840
  • Receive Date: 11 October 2025
  • Accept Date: 13 October 2025