Comparison of Intranasal Ketamine versus Oral Midazolam as Pre-Anesthetic Agents with Nitrous Oxide in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Ophthalmic Examination under Anesthesia

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Medical Student, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

10.48305/jims.v43.i810.0310

Abstract

Background: The administration of sedative agents before surgery offers numerous advantages, particularly in pediatric patients. Due to the limitations of existing studies, this study sought to assess the comparative effectiveness of intranasal ketamine and oral midazolam in terms of their sedative properties and impact on vital signs during eye examinations conducted under anesthesia.
Methods: Patients in the ketamine group received intranasal ketamine at a dose of 5 mg/kg, while those in the midazolam group were given oral midazolam at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg. Placebo groups received normal saline via intranasal or oral routes accordingly. Patients underwent the procedure while sedated with nitrous oxide. Patient status was assessed at various time points around the procedure.
Findings: Thirty participants, with a mean age of (4.10 ± 1.13) years, were enrolled in this study. No significant difference was observed in the mean recovery time (25.36 ± 3.29) between the ketamine and midazolam groups (P = 0.09). Severe hemodynamic changes (hypoxia, significant bradycardia or tachycardia, and significant bradypnea or tachypnea) were not observed in any of the patients studied. Changes in heart rate (109.50 ± 8.96 beats/min), respiratory rate (25.1 ± 0.90 breaths/min), and SpO₂ (94.8 ± 0.8%) showed no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.74, P = 0.96, and P = 0.10, respectively), indicating that both interventions induced similar levels of sedation (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Both intranasal ketamine and oral midazolam are safe and effective pre-anesthetic agents with similar and optimal efficacy for preparing children and performing eye examinations under anesthesia. However, considering side effects and route tolerance, midazolam can be recommended.

Highlights

Mojtaba Rahimi-Varposhti : Google Scholar, PubMed

Afsaneh Naderi Beni :Google Scholar, PubMed

Behzad Nazemroaya : Google Scholar, PubMed

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Stern J, Agarwal A, Pozun A. Pediatric procedural sedation. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
  2. Dhillon HK, Agarkar S, Vijaya L, Bhende M, Baskaran M, Jaichandran VV. Examination under anesthesia: Preferred Practice. Indian J Ophthalmol 2023; 71(11): 3438-45.
  3. Datta PK, Sinha R, Ray BR, Jambunathan V, Kundu R. Anesthesia maintenance with ‘induction dose only’sevoflurane during pediatric ophthalmic examination: comparison with standard low‐flow technique through a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth 2017; 27(2): 162-9.
  4. Cok OY. Anaesthesia for eye examination. Current Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2009; 20(1): 46-9.
  5. Fishman G, Botzer E, Marouani N, DeRowe A. Nitrous oxide–oxygen inhalation for outpatient otologic examination and minor procedures performed on the uncooperative child. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 69(4): 501-4.
  6. Zhao X, Zhou SC, Wang XF, Liao HW. The role of statins in patients with early diabetic nephropathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101(24): e29099.
  7. Knuf K, Maani CV. Nitrous oxide. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
  8. Mayel M, Nejad MA, Khabaz MS, Bazrafshani MS, Mohajeri E. Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial. T Turk J Emerg Med 2020; 20(4): 168-74.
  9. Lingamchetty TN, Hosseini SA, Saadabadi A. Midazolam. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
  10. Gómez-Manzano FJ, Laredo-Aguilera JA, Cobo-Cuenca AI, Rabanales-Sotos J, Rodríguez-Cañamero S, Martín-Espinosa N, et al. Evaluation of intranasal midazolam for pediatric sedation during the suturing of traumatic lacerations: a systematic review. Children (Basel) 2022; 9(5): 644.
  11. Khoshrang H, Alavi CE, Rimaz S, Mirmansouri A, Farzi F, Biazar G, et al. Efficacy of intranasal ketamine and midazolam for pediatric sedation: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Caspian J Intern Med 2021; 12(4): 539-43.
  12. Cossovel F, Trombetta A, Ramondo A, Riccio G, Ronfani L, Saccari A, et al. Intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine association allows shorter induction time for pediatric sedation compared to intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam. Ital J Pediatr 2022; 48(1): 5.
  13. Alhaidari RI, AlSarheed M, Sheta SA, Aldhubaiban M. Intranasal fentanyl combined with oral midazolam for pediatric dental sedation: a controlled randomized blinded crossover clinical trial. Pediatr Dent 2022; 44(4): 255-60.
  14. Guthrie AM, Baum RA, Carter C, Dugan A, Jones L, Tackett T, et al. Use of intranasal ketamine in pediatric patients in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2021; 37(12): e1001-e7.
  15. Isik B, Arslan M, Özsoylar Ö, Akçabay M. The effects of α2-adrenergic receptor agonist dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic response in direct laryngoscopy. OTO Open 2007; 1; 5-11.
  16. Robert C, Soulier A, Sciard D, Dufour G, Alberti C, Boizeau P, et al. Cognitive status of patients judged fit for discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit after general anaesthesia: a randomized comparison between desflurane and propofol. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21(1): 76.
  17. Kim D, Khazaeni L, Dunbar J. Physician effort in pediatric examination under Anesthesia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2018; 59(9): 4131.
  18. Avva U, Lata JM, Hendrix M, Kiel J. Airway management. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
  19. Klein EJ, Diekema DS, Paris CA, Quan L, Cohen M, Seidel KD. A randomized, clinical trial of oral midazolam plus placebo versus oral midazolam plus oral transmucosal fentanyl for sedation during laceration repair. Pediatrics 2002; 109(5): 894-7.
  20. Rubinstein O, Barkan S, Breitbart R, Berkovitch S, Toledano M, Weiser G, et al. Efficacy of oral ketamine compared to midazolam for sedation of children undergoing laceration repair: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(26): e3984.
  21. Barkan S, Breitbart R, Brenner-Zada G, Feldon M, Assa A, Toledano M, et al. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of oral midazolam plus oral ketamine for sedation of children during laceration repair. Emerg Med J 2014; 31(8): 649-53.
  22. Nie J, Chen C, Xie J, Ding G. Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC anesthesiol 2023; 23(1): 341.
  23. Manso MA, Guittet C, Vandenhende F, Granier LA. Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review. Paediatr Anaesth 2019; 29(11): 1094-106.
  24. Parida S, Senthilnathan M. Administration of paediatric intranasal sedation: Need for appropriate formulation & equipment for dispensation. Indian J Med Res 2023; 157(1): 96-9.
  25. Goddard K, Sampson C, Ghadban R, Stilley J, Goddard KB. Effect of ketamine on cardiovascular function during procedural sedation of adults. Cureus 2021; 13(3): e14228.
  26. Shafi RI, Goswami M, Rahman B, Nangia T, Nisa TU, Chawla S. Comparative evaluation of changes in physiological and psychomotor effects in pediatric patients during extraction under different concentrations of nitrous oxide–oxygen inhalation sedation. C Contemp Clin Dent 2021; 12(4): 414-8.
  27. Javaherforoosh F, Pipelzadeh M, Salary A, Zabihi A. Comparison of preanesthetic sedation after intranasal administration of fentanyle, ketamin and midazolam [in Persian]. Armaghane Danesh 2006; 11(2): 19-27.
  28. Poonai N, Canton K, Ali S, Hendrikx S, Shah A, Miller M, et al. Intranasal ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: A systematic review. PLoS One 2017; 12(3): e0173253
  29. Ghajari MF, Ansari G, Soleymani AA, Shayeghi S, Ardakani FF. Comparison of oral and intranasal midazolam/ketamine sedation in 3-6-year-old uncooperative dental patients. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2015; 9(2): 61-5.
  30. Wang J, Zeng J, Zhao N, Chen S, Chen Z, Liao J, et al. Intranasal esketamine combined with oral midazolam provides adequate sedation for outpatient pediatric dental procedures: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2023; 109(7): 1893-9.
  31. Pandey RK, Bahetwar SK, Saksena AK, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of drops versus atomized administration of intranasal ketamine for the procedural sedation of young uncooperative pediatric dental patients: a prospective crossover trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011; 36(1): 79-84.
  32. Bahetwar SK, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam, ketamine and their combination for sedation of young uncooperative pediatric dental patients: a triple blind randomized crossover trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011; 35: 415-20.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 43, Issue 810
2nd Week, June
May and June 2025
Pages 310-318

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 25 March 2024
  • Revise Date: 04 July 2025
  • Accept Date: 01 June 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics