Evaluating the Effect of Virtual Reality Technology on Anxiety Reduction in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 MSc Medical Imaging Technology, Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 PhD, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 PhD in Medical Physics, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

10.48305/jims.v43.i825.0896

Abstract

Background: One of the common challenges in radiology departments is the increased anxiety levels of patients during CT scans, which may lead to reduced image quality and diagnostic inaccuracies. This study evaluates the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) technology in managing and alleviating stress among patients undergoing CT imaging.
Methods: In this study, 162 patients were randomly assigned in 2024 at radiology centers affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences into two groups: an intervention group (using VR headsets to experience calming environments during the CT scan) and a control group (undergoing imaging without this technology). Anxiety levels in both groups were measured before and after the CT scan using the standardized Spielberger Anxiety Scale. Data analysis with a significance level set at (P < 0.05).
Findings: The findings demonstrated that VR technology significantly reduced patients' anxiety levels (P < 0.05). The mean Spielberger anxiety score in the experimental group decreased from 45.09 (moderate anxiety) before the intervention to 41.42 (mild anxiety) afterward. This positive effect was consistently observed across all demographic subgroups, including age, education level, and income.
Conclusion: VR technology can serve as a safe and effective therapeutic method for reducing stress and anxiety in patients undergoing CT scans. This innovative approach has the potential to be adopted as a complementary strategy in radiology departments to enhance service quality and improve patient experience.

Highlights

Mohammad Mehdi Azizi Bondarabadi: Google Scholar

Korosh Saber: Google Scholar, PubMed

Ahmad Shanei: Google Scholar, PubMed

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Shi L, Tashiro S. Estimation of the effects of medical diagnostic radiation exposure based on DNA damage. J Radiat Res 2018; 59(Suppl_2): ii121-ii129.‏
  2. Zhihui D, Florenly, Napiah Nasution A. The role of imaging in modern medical science: techniques, applications, and future directions. Frontiers in Health Informatics. 2024; 13(3): 3976-88.‏
  3. Bolowia N. Computed Tomography (CT) Scans: Advancements in Oncology Diagnosis and Treatment. Derna Academy Journal for Applied Sciences 2025; 3(2): 133-47.‏‏
  4. Park G, Weiss SJ, Repar P. Randomized single-blinded clinical trial on effects of nursery songs for infants and young children’s anxiety before and during head computed tomography. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33(10): 1477-82.‏
  5. Heyer CM, Thüring J, Lemburg SP, Kreddig N, Hasenbring M, Dohna M, et al. Anxiety of patients undergoing CT imaging—an underestimated problem?. Acad Radiol 2015; 22(1): 105-12.‏
  6. Lange S, Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska W, Małecka-DubielA A. Patient Experience during Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Examination: Anxiety, Feelings, and Safety. Safety 2023; 9(4): 69.‏
  7. Vieira L, Pires A, Grilo A. Anxiety experienced by oncological patients who undergo 18F-FDG PET CT: a systematic review. Radiography (Lond) 2021; 27(4): 1203-10.‏
  8. Henning Niehoff J, Heuser A, Michael AE, Lennartz S, Borggrefe J, Robert Kroeger J. Patient comfort in modern computed tomography: what really counts. Tomography 2022; 8(3): 1401-12.‏
  9. Wiederhold B, Bouchard S. Claustrophobia: Efficacy and Treatment Protocols. In: Advances in Virtual Reality and Anxiety Disorders. Series in Anxiety and Related Disorders. Boston, MA: Springer; 2014.‏
  10. Keriş EY. Effect of patient anxiety on image motion artefacts in CBCT. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17(1): 73.‏
  11. Zahraei-Moghaddam SM, Haghighatafshar M, Shekoohi-Shooli F, Miladi S, Farhoudi F. Toward applying a device to reduce motion artifact during imaging: a randomized controlled trial. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19(2): 189-94.‏
  12. Makary MS, da Silva A, Kingsbury J, Jordan Bozer J, Dowell JD, Nguyen XV. Noninvasive approaches for anxiety reduction during interventional radiology procedures. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 29(4): 197-201.‏
  13. Verma N, Dahake JS. Evaluating sedation strategies for magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive review of intravenous fentanyl, butorphanol, and midazolam in adult and pediatric populations. Cureus 2024; 16(4): e58593.‏
  14. Dellazizzo L, Potvin S, Luigi M, Dumais A. Evidence on virtual reality–based therapies for psychiatric disorders: meta-review of meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(8): e20889.‏
  15. Oing T, Prescott J. Implementations of virtual reality for anxiety-related disorders: systematic review. JMIR Serious Games 2018; 6(4): e10965.‏
  16. Keshvari M, Yeganeh MR, Paryad E, Atrkar Roushan Z, Pouralizadeh M. The effect of virtual reality distraction on reducing patients' anxiety before coronary angiography: a randomized clinical trial study. Egypt Heart J 2021; 73(1): 98.‏
  17. Han SH, Park JW, Choi S Il, Young Kim J, Lee H, Yoo HJ, et al. Effect of immersive virtual reality education before chest radiography on anxiety and distress among pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173(11): 1026-31.‏
  18. TM, Bekker The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 1992; 31(3): 301-6.‏
  19. Rezaei S, Mousavi SV. The effect of monotheistic integrated psychotherapy on the levels of resilience, anxiety, and depression among prisoners. Health Spiritual Med Ethics 2019; 6(1): 2-10.‏
  20. Kim Y, Yoo SH, Chun J, Kim JH, Youn YH, Park H. Relieving anxiety through virtual reality prior to endoscopic procedures. Yonsei Med J 2023; 64(2): 117–22.‏
  21. Brown RKJ, Petty S, O'Malley S, Stojanovska J, Davenport MS, Kazerooni EA, et al. Virtual reality tool simulates MRI experience. Tomography 2018; 4(3): 95-8.‏
  22. Jamshidi N, Abbaszadeh A, Najafi Kalyani M, Sharif F. Effectiveness of video information on coronary angiography patients’ outcomes. Collegian 2013; 20(3): 153-9.
  23. Saliba T, Boitsios G, Preziosi M, Negro G, De Leucio A, Simoni P. Virtual reality simulations to alleviate fear and anxiety in children awaiting MRI: a small-scale randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput 2025; 39(1): 183-92.‏
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 43, Issue 825
1st Week, October
September and October 2025
Pages 896-903

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 May 2025
  • Accept Date: 03 November 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics