Journal of Isfahan Medical School

Journal of Isfahan Medical School

A Comparative Overview of Impact Oscillometry and Spirometry in the Assessment of Obstructive Airway Disease in Industrial Workers

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors
1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, AND, Bamdad Respiratory Research Center, Isfahan, Iran
2 Faculty of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Isfahan university of medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Occupational Medicine, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
10.48305/jims.v44.i852.0192
Abstract
Introduction: Obstructive airway diseases represent significant occupational health challenges in industrial settings. Early identification of these conditions is essential to prevent progression and irreversible complications. While spirometry is recognized as the gold standard for diagnosis, impulse oscillometry (IOS), a new and non-invasive technique, has showed substantial potential for early detection, particularly in small airways. This review article aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of both methods in screening and monitoring the lung health of industrial workers.
Discussion: Spirometry detects obstruction by measuring airflow and lung volume; however, its reliance on maximum patient cooperation presents a notable limitation. In contrast, impulse oscillometry measures airway resistance (R) and reactance (X) while requiring only calm, normal breathing, thus offering greater sensitivity for early disease detection in small airways. Numerous studies have indicated that IOS can identify functional impairments in workers exposed to pollutants before spirometry shows any changes.
Conclusion: Impulse oscillometry appears to be a valuable complementary tool to spirometry in lung health screening programs for industrial workers. Integrating these two methods can provide a more comprehensive assessment and facilitate early detection of obstructive airway diseases, enabling timely preventive measures.

Highlights

Babak Amra: Google Scholar

Maryam Nasirian: Google Scholar

Amirhossein Khandan: Google Scholar

Keywords
Subjects

1.     Smith HM. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of crude oil composition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines; 1968. Report No.: BM-BULL-642.
2.     King RW. Petroleum: its composition, analysis and processing. Occup Med (Phila). 1988 Jul-Sep;3(3):409-30.
3.     MacFarland HN. Toxicology of petroleum hydrocarbons. Occup Med (Phila). 1988 Jul-Sep;3(3):445-54.
4.     Carrasco JM, Lope V, Pérez-Gómez B, Aragonés N, Suárez B, López-Abente G, et al. Association between health information, use of protective devices and occurrence of acute health problems in the Prestige oil spill clean-up in Asturias and Cantabria (Spain): a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2006 Jan 4;6:1.
5.     Ordinioha B, Brisibe S. The human health implications of crude oil spills in the Niger delta, Nigeria: An interpretation of published studies. Niger Med J. 2013 Jan;54(1):10-6.
6.     Meo SA, Alrashed AH, Almana AA, Altheiban YI, Aldosari MS, Almudarra NF, et al. Lung function and fractional exhaled nitric oxide among petroleum refinery workers. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015 Oct 29;10:37.
7.     Brashier B, Salvi S. Breath. Marigold Complex, Kalyaninagar, Pune, India: Chest Research Foundation; 2015.
8.     Contoli M, Bousquet J, Fabbri LM, Magnussen H, Rabe KF, Siafakas NM, et al. The small airways and distal lung compartment in asthma and COPD: a time for reappraisal. Allergy. 2010 Feb;65(2):141-51.
9.     Thien F. Measuring and imaging small airways dysfunction in asthma. Asia Pac Allergy. 2013 Oct;3(4):224-30.
10.  Parums DV. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) 2023 guidelines for COPD, including COVID-19, climate change, and air pollution. Med Sci Monit. 2023 Dec 18;29:e942672.
11.  Nishi SP, Wang Y, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS, Sharma G. Spirometry use among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 1999–2008. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Dec;10(6):565-73.
12.  Jarenbäck L, Ankerst J, Bjermer L, Tufvesson E. Flow-volume parameters in COPD related to extended measurements of lung volume, diffusion, and resistance. Pulm Med. 2013;2013:782052.
13.  Salvi S, Ghorpade D, Vanjare N, Madas S, Agrawal A. Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores or fixed cut-off values? ERJ Open Res. 2023 Apr 3;9(2):00656-2022.
14.  Lu L, Peng J, Zhao N, Wu F, Tian H, Yang H, et al. Discordant spirometry and impulse oscillometry assessments in the diagnosis of small airway dysfunction. Front Physiol. 2022 Jun 15;13:892448.
15.  Mousa H, Kamal E. Impulse oscillation system versus spirometry in assessment of obstructive airway diseases. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2018 Apr;67(2):106-12.
16.  Abdo M, Watz H, Trinkmann F, Bohnet S, Guess MAM, Roeben J, et al. Oscillometry-defined small airway dysfunction in tobacco-exposed adults with impaired or preserved airflow. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 May 1;211(9):1652–61.
 
Volume 44, Issue 852
4th Week, April
March and April 2026
Pages 192-199

  • Receive Date 21 December 2025
  • Accept Date 27 January 2026