Journal of Isfahan Medical School

Journal of Isfahan Medical School

Policy Strategies Related to Redesigning the Dialysis Type Selection Process with a Patient-Centered Engagement

Document Type : policy brief

Authors
1 PhD Student in Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
3 Professor of Nursing, Department of Pediatric and Neonatal Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
10.48305/jims.v44.i856.0436
Abstract
End-stage renal disease is one of the most challenging chronic diseases that places patients on the path of making critical decisions about their treatment modality (hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or kidney transplantation). Despite the emphasis of national and international laws on the patient’s right to informed participation in the treatment process, the findings of a qualitative study in Iran show that most dialysis patients do not have a role in choosing their dialysis type and are not consulted about it. This gap serves as a significant barrier to patients’ quality of life and the central ethics of the health system. Analysis of the lived experiences of these patients has identified three key factors as the root of this problem: 1) an information gap (lack of awareness of available options and their consequences), 2) fear and helplessness in the face of the unknowns of the disease and treatment, and 3) a physician-centered culture that limits the space for active dialogue.
Based on this evidence, this policy brief proposes three strategic options to overcome this challenge: developing a national shared decision-making guideline as the legal basis for change, developing a national multimedia educational platform to empower patients and fill the information gap, and, finally, setting up specialized dialysis method consultation clinics. The first two options are prioritized for implementation, which complement each other and simultaneously target both the culture of the health system and the level of patient awareness.

Highlights

Robabeh Ghomi  : Google Scholar

Fatemeh Biabani: Google Scholar

Mahboobeh Namnabati: Google Scholar

Keywords
Subjects

1.     Ghomi R, Gkajian Galoogahi Z. Dialysis Patients' Experiences of Participating in Dialysis Type Selection: A Phenomenological Study [in Persian]. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci 2024; 29(4): 392- 402.
2.     Minei AP, Kaipu SO. Respect for patients’ right to autonomy. J Health Sci 2020; 8: 100-12.
3.     Biabani F, MahmudiRad GH, Hassankhani H, Rahmani A. Experiences of Iranian peritoneal dialysis patients regarding the decision to choose the type of kidney replacement therapy: a qualitative study [in Persian]. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci 2023; 29(6): 769-84.
4.     Bahrami MA, Jafari H, Jambarsang S, Entezarian Ardakani S. Patients' decision-making preferences and perceived participation in care: a case study in selected educational hospitals of Yazd [in Persian]. Manage Strat Health Syst 2021; 6(2): 117-32.
5.     Vaskouei EK, Hajinabi K, Riahi L, Maleki M. Patient sheared decision‐making models: a comparative study [in Persian]. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research (IJNR) 2019; 13(6): 83-93.
 
Volume 44, Issue 856
4th Week, May (Policy Brief)
May and June 2026
Pages 436-440

  • Receive Date 14 November 2025
  • Accept Date 15 November 2025