Journal of Isfahan Medical School

Journal of Isfahan Medical School

SITE scoring system for surgical decision-making in patients with spondylodiscitis: a retrospective clinical applicability study

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors
1 Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Research Center, Al-Zahra Hospital, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 assistant professor of neurosurgery, Fellowship of spine surgery, department of neurosurgery, Aja University of medical science, Tehran, Iran
3 department of neurosurgery, khatam al anbia hospitalTehran, Iran.
Abstract
Spondylodiscitis is a severe spinal infection that poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The Surgical Infection Treatment and Severity (SITE) scoring system was developed to support surgical decision-making in infectious spinal diseases. This study aimed to assess the clinical applicability and supportive validity of the SITE scoring system in patients with de novo pyogenic spondylodiscitis.
Methods:
This retrospective analytical study included 165 adult patients with confirmed de novo spondylodiscitis who were managed either surgically or conservatively according to SITE-based criteria. Patients were divided into two severity groups (SITE < 8 and SITE ≥ 8). Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed, and recovery was categorized as partial, full, or second full recovery. Sensitivity, specificity, and optimal cut-off values for predicting surgical need were determined using ROC curve analysis and Youden’s index. lskdflkesd
Results:
Among 165 patients (mean age 54.6 ± 14.7 years; 52% male), 61.2% underwent surgery. The SITE score showed acceptable association

Highlights

Majid Rezvani: Google Scholar ,PubMed

Mohammadreza Boustani: Google Scholar

Keywords
Subjects

Volume 44, Issue 878
1st Week, Novwmber
November and December 2026

  • Receive Date 29 August 2026
  • Accept Date 07 September 2026