Distribution of Patients with Septic Shock in Gynecology wards in A Period of Ten Years

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Medical Student, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Septic shock is an important and serious disease. The major aim of this research was to find demographic factors and etiology of septic shock.Methods: In this retrospective descriptive research, 400 patients with the diagnosis of septic shock who were admitted in obstetric and gynecologic words of Alzahra and Beheshti hospitals in Isfahan during ten years were evaluated. The data about age, marital status, and etiology was gathered.Results: Most of the patients were in 25-35 years and married. The most prevalent etiology of the disease was septic abortion. Most of the patients had 2 or more children and lived in town. Most of patients had history of surgical treatment plus medical treatment, had admitted for 5 days or more in hospital, were treated by 3 antibiotics and most of them lived.Conclusion: This research concluded that etiology of most of the septic shocks was septic abortion that has done illegally and in non sterile condition because of economical and social problems of having more children. This emphasized the importance of people education for avoidance of doing illegally induced abortion and septic abortion.  

Keywords

References

  1. Russell JA. Management of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(16): 1699-713.
  2. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(16): 1546-54.
  3. Gordon MC. Maternal Sepsis. In: Foley MR, Strong TH, editors. Obstetic Intensive Care. WB Sannders Company; 2000. p. 129-46.
  4. Guinn DA, Abel DE, Tomlinson MW. Early goal directed therapy for sepsis during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2007; 34(3)xi: 495-79.
  5. Haddad LB, Nour NM. Unsafe abortion: unnecessary maternal mortality. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009; 2(2): 122-6.
  6. Sousa A, Lozano R, Gakidou E. Exploring the determinants of unsafe abortion: improving the evidence base in Mexico. Health Policy Plan 2010; 25(4): 300-10.
  7. Okonofua FE, Hammed A, Nzeribe E, Saidu B, Abass T, Adeboye G, et al. Perceptions of policymakers in Nigeria toward unsafe abor-tion and maternal mortality. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2009; 35(4): 194-202.
  8. Vlassoff M, Walker D, Shearer J, Newlands D, Singh S. Estimates of health care system costs of unsafe abortion in Africa and Latin America. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2009; 35(3): 114-21.
  9. World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion, authors. Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2003. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 28, Issue 121 - Serial Number 121
November and December 2011
Pages 1695-1700

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 March 2011
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics