The Effect of Spinal Anesthesia as a Risk Factor for Low Back Pain in Women after Cesarean Section

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Resident, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

5 Student of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

Abstract

Background: We planned a study to investigate the effect of spinal anesthesia in producing low back pain (LBP) in women following Cesarean section.Methods: During a prospective cohort study, 100 women who underwent spinal anesthesia and Cesarean operation were compared with 100 women who underwent general anesthesia and Cesarean operation during a 3-months follow-up as developing later low back pain.Findings: During 3-months follow-up, 25 and 43 patients in general and spinal anesthesia groups developed low back pain, respectively, which was statistically different according to chi-square test (P = 0.007). So, the prevalence of low back pain was 1.99 times more in spinal anesthesia group. It is important to note that the infant's weight had strong effect in producing low back pain; as increasing every 1 kg in weight increased the chance of low back pain for 2.1 times.Conclusion: There incidence low back pain was higher in women who underwent Cesarean operation under spinal anesthesia; this high incidence not only depended on the type of anesthesia, but on other factors such as the infant's birth weight. Thus, when planning Cesarean operation, it is necessary to consider the underlying factors in mother and child which can be effective in producing later low back pain and then accept the type of anesthesia.

Keywords

References

  1. Itz CJ, Geurts JW, van Kleef M, Nelemans P. Clinical course of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies set in primary care. Eur J Pain 2013; 17(1): 5-15.
  2. Henschke N, Ostelo RW, van Tulder MW, Vlaeyen JW, Morley S, Assendelft WJ, et al. Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (7): CD002014.
  3. Skouteris H, McCabe M, Milgrom J, Kent B, Bruce LJ, Mihalopoulos C, et al. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a specialized health coaching intervention to prevent excessive gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention in women: the HIPP study. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 78.
  4. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping people change. 3rd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2012.
  5. Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, So EM, Chan CC. Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92(2): 176-83.
  6. Iles R, Taylor NF, Davidson M, O'Halloran P. Telephone coaching can increase activity levels for people with non-chronic low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother 2011; 57(4): 231-8.
  7. Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Bureau Y, Speechley MR. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther 2006; 86(6): 817-24.
  8. Chilton R, Pires-Yfantouda R, Wylie M. A systematic review of motivational interviewing within musculoskeletal health. Psychol Health Med 2012; 17(4): 392-407.
  9. Armstrong MJ, Mottershead TA, Ronksley PE, Sigal RJ, Campbell TS, Hemmelgarn BR. Motivational interviewing to improve weight loss in overweight and/or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 2011; 12(9): 709-23.
  10. Haghighi M, Mardani Kivi M, Sedighi Nejad A, Mohammadzadeh A, Etehad H, Soleymanha M, et al . Evaluation of Correlative Factor of Backache and Headache after Spinal Anesthesia in Orthopedic Surgery. J Guilan Univ Med Sci 2012; 21(82): 31-8. [In Persian].
  11. Salmela L, Aromaa U, Cozanitis DA. Leg and back pain after spinal anaesthesia involving hyperbaric 5% lignocaine. Anaesthesia 1996; 51(4): 391-3.
  12. Davies MJ, Cook RJ, Quach K. Transient lumbar pain after 5% hyperbaric lignocaine spinal anaesthesia in patients having minor vascular surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30(6): 782-5.
  13. Sardin B, Boncoeur MP, Desport JC, Abderrazak M, Guillaume A. Delayed low back pain after spinal anesthesia. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1995; 14(2): 230-2. [In French].
  14. Pasban Noghabi S, Hamzei A, Nazemi H, Kamran Bilandy H. Correlative factors of post-dural puncture backache in cesarean section. J Jahrom Univ Med Sci 2013; 11(4): 53-9. [In Persian].
  15. Mogren IM. Does caesarean section negatively influence the post-partum prognosis of low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy? Eur Spine J 2007; 16(1): 115-21.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 35, Issue 417 - Serial Number 417
January and February 2017
Pages 32-37

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 November 2016
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics