The Effects of Three Different Doses of Sufentanil on Changes in Blood Pressure and Heart Rate after Laryngoscopy and Intubation, and Comparison with the Control Group

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Student of Medicine, Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Hemodynamic disorders is a common and serious complication during endotracheal intubation with various suggested preventive methods; but there is no consensus. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of three different doses of sufentanil on heart rate and blood pressure changes after laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, and to compare it with the control group.Methods: In a double-blind clinical trial study, 128 patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were randomly divided into 4 groups of 32. In the first group, as the control group, the drug was not injected, and the other three groups received 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 µg/kg sufentanil, respectively, which was injected before laryngoscopy. Hemodynamic parameters were determined at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after laryngoscopy, and were compared between the four groups.Findings: The trend of blood pressure changes during laryngoscopy was significantly different between the four groups; but the changes in heart rate and oxygen saturation were not different between the groups. Changes in the level of hemodynamic parameters showed that the group receiving 0.3 µg/kg sufentanil had higher stability during the laryngoscopy.Conclusion: Dosage of 0.3 µg/kg sufentanil appears to be associated with favorable hemodynamic stability of patients during laryngoscopy and endotracheal tube insertion.

Keywords

References

  1. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59(3): 295-9.
  2. Kovac AL. Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8(1): 63-79.
  3. Edwards ND, Alford AM, Dobson PM, Peacock JE, Reilly CS. Myocardial ischaemia during tracheal intubation and extubation. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73(4): 537-9.
  4. Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, Villanueva R, King BD. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1977; 47(6): 524-5.
  5. Khandavilli H, Chandra M, Kamra SK. Comparison of hemodynamics following endotracheal intubation using curved macintosh and straight miller laryngoscopy blade. Int J Sci Res 2019; 8(2): 33-5.
  6. Safavi M, Honarmand A. The comparability of second dose thiopental with Lidocaine in the attenuation of cardiovascular response to endotracheal intubation. Iran Cardiovasc Res J 2009; 3(1): 34-42.
  7. Vuyk J, Lim T, Engbers FH, Burm AG, Vletter AA, Bovill JG. The pharmacodynamic interaction of propofol and alfentanil during lower abdominal surgery in women. Anesthesiology 1995; 83(1): 8-22.
  8. Pouraghaei M, Moharamzadeh P, Soleimanpour H, Rahmani F, Safari S, Mahmoodpoor A, et al. Comparison between the effects of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil on hemodynamic indices during rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department. Anesth Pain Med 2014; 4(1): e14618.
  9. Albertin A, Casati A, Deni F, Danelli G, Comotti L, Grifoni F, et al. Clinical comparison of either small doses of fentanyl or remifentanil for blunting cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation. Minerva Anestesiol 2000; 66(10): 691-6.
  10. Choi BH, Lee YC. Effective Bolus Dose of Sufentanil to Attenuate Cardiovascular Responses in Laryngoscopic Double-Lumen Endobronchial Intubation. Anesth Pain Med 2016; 6(2): e33640. Monk JP, Beresford R, Ward A. Sufentanil. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs 1988; 36(3): 286-313.
  11. Xue FS, Xu YC, Liu Y, Yang QY, Liao X, Liu HP, et al. Different small-dose sufentanil blunting cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in children: a randomized, double-blind comparison. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100(5): 717-23.
  12. Iannuzzi E, Iannuzzi M, Cirillo V, Viola G, Parisi R, Cerulli A, et al. Peri-intubation cardiovascular response during low dose remifentanil or sufentanil administration in association with propofol TCI. A double blind comparison. Minerva Anestesiol 2004; 70(3): 109-15.
  13. Casati A, Fanelli G, Albertin A, Deni F, Danelli G, Grifoni F, et al. Small doses of remifentanil or sufentanil for blunting cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation: A double-blind comparison. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18(2): 108-12.
  14. Shetabi H, Honarmand A, Adinehmehr L, Kaviani R. Comparison of the effect of thiopental sodium-midazolam combination on the hemodynamic response between tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway insertion: A clinical trial study. Sci J Kurdistan Univ 2019; 24(2): 99-110. [In Persian].
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 37, Issue 556 - Serial Number 556
November and December 2020
Pages 1369-1375

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 August 2019
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics