Comparison of the Results of Bandaging and Casting in Patients with First- and Second-Degree Sprain of Lateral Ankle Ligaments

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Student of Medicine, Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Resident, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Epidemiologist, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: In this study, we compared the results of bandaging and casting in patients with first- and second-degree sprain of lateral ankle ligaments.Methods: The was a randomized clinical trial study on 88 patients with ankle sprain referring to Alzahra hospital, Isfahan City, Iran, during 2015-2016; all of them met inclusion criteria. We then recorded the data by case-taking and examination based on the prepared checklist. Patients were randomly divided into two groups receiving early mobilization and cast immobilization, respectively. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical tests using SPSS software at the significance level of P < 0.05.Findings: After two weeks, mean pain was reduced in the first group (31.2 ± 1.2) compared to the second group (48.6 ± 2.4), showing a significant difference (P < 0.05). Average range of motion in the ankle was 28.08 ± 1.20 in the first and 21.30 ± 2.10 in the second group after two weeks, indicating a significant increase in the first group as compared to the second one (P < 0.05).Conclusion: In the first- and second-degree sprain of lateral ankle ligaments, bandaging performs better than casting in decreasing pain and swelling and improving the range of motion of the joint.

Keywords

References

  1. Drake RL, Vogl W, Mitchell AWM, Gray H. Gray's anatomy for students. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2010. p. 605-12.
  2. Ferri FF. Ferri's clinical advisor 2015: 5 books in 1. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2014. p. 107-8.
  3. Brotzman SB, Manske RC, Daugherty K. Clinical orthopaedic rehabilitation: An evidence-based approach. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2011. p. 315-70.
  4. Ivins D. Acute ankle sprain: An update. Am Fam Physician 2006; 74(10): 1714-20.
  5. Soboroff SH, Pappius EM, Komaroff AL. Benefits, risks, and costs of alternative approaches to the evaluation and treatment of severe ankle sprain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; (183): 160-8.
  6. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19(10): 653-60.
  7. Yeung MS, Chan KM, So CH, Yuan WY. An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain. Br J Sports Med 1994; 28(2): 112-6.
  8. Barker HB, Beynnon BD, Renstrom PA. Ankle injury risk factors in sports. Sports Med 1997; 23(2): 69-74.
  9. Fong DT, Hong Y, Chan LK, Yung PS, Chan KM. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med 2007; 37(1): 73-94.
  10. Waterman BR, Owens BD, Davey S, Zacchilli MA, Belmont PJ, Jr. The epidemiology of ankle sprains in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(13): 2279-84.
  11. Tiemstra JD. Update on acute ankle sprains. Am Fam Physician 2012; 85(12): 1170-6.
  12. Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN. Acute lateral ankle ligament ruptures in the athlete: The role of surgery. Foot Ankle Clin 2013; 18(2): 215-8.
  13. Kerkhoffs GM, Struijs PA, Marti RK, Assendelft WJ, Blankevoort L, Van Dijk CN. Different functional treatment strategies for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (3): CD002938.
  14. Brennan MJ, Hayes S, Watson JT. Orthotics versus casting in the management of lower extremity sprains, fractures, and other common orthopaedic problems. Contemp Orthop 1991; 22(6): 683-713.
  15. Kerkhoffs GM, Handoll HH, de Bie R, Rowe BH, Struijs PA. Surgical versus conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2): CD000380.
  16. Kerkhoffs GM, Rowe BH, Assendelft WJ, Kelly KD, Struijs PA, Van Dijk CN. WITHDRAWN: Immobilisation and functional treatment for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (3): CD003762.
  17. Allen MJ, McShane M. Inversion injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle joint. A pilot study of treatment. Br J Clin Pract 1985; 39(7): 282-6.
  18. Leanderson J, Wredmark T. Treatment of acute ankle sprain. Comparison of a semi-rigid ankle brace and compression bandage in 73 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66(6): 529-31.
  19. Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Sward L. Early functional treatment for acute ligament injuries of the ankle joint. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1996; 6(6): 341-5.
  20. Sommer HM, Schreiber H. Early functional conservative therapy of fresh fibular capsular ligament rupture from the socioeconomic viewpoint. Sportverletz Sportschaden 1993; 7(1): 40-6. [In German].
  21. Twellaar M, Veldhuizen JW, Verstappen FT. Ankle sprains. Comparison of long-term results of functional treatment methods with adhesive tape and bandage ("brace") and stability measurement. Unfallchirurg 1993; 96(9): 477-82. [In German].
  22. Mohammadi H, Ghafarian-Shiraz H, Saniee F, Delaviz H. Functional treatment comparing with immobilization after acute ankle sprain. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 2013; 15(2): 28-31. [In Persian].
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 35, Issue 449 - Serial Number 449
September and October 2017
Pages 1321-1326

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 February 2017
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics