Evaluation of the Role of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Grading of Glial Tumors based on Relative Anisotropy

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Department of Radiology, School of Paramedicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, School of Paramedicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Research Center for Neurosurgery and Functional Nerves, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Radiology, School of Paramedicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Background: The most common primary tumors of the brain are gliomas. Despite improvements in treatment strategy, the prognosis for patients with high-grade gliomas has stayed poor, while it is relatively good for low-grade gliomas. The main and gold standard way for grading glial tumor is biopsy. Accurate assessment of tumor grade is vital for the determination of best treatment plan. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of diffusion tensor imaging (as a noninvasive method) using relative anisotropy (RA) in glial tumor grading.Methods: A total of 20 histologically confirmed gliomas patients were scanned using a 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance scanner. We described two regions of interest (ROIs), white matter adjacent to the tumor and the homologous fiber tracts to first ROI in the contralateral hemisphere.Findings: The relative anisotropy values and ratio of the low-grade gliomas tended to be higher than those of the high-grade gliomas in the peritumoral fibers (P = 0.008, for RAt and P = 0.039 for RAt/n).Conclusion: Our findings prove that the relative anisotropy was different between low- and high-grade gliomas, which may be helpful in grading.

Keywords

References

  1. Brat DJ, van Meir EG. Vaso-occlusive and prothrombotic mechanisms associated with tumor hypoxia, necrosis, and accelerated growth in glioblastoma. Lab Invest 2004; 84(4): 397-405.
  2. Kayama T, Kumabe T, Tominaga T, Yoshimoto T. Prognostic value of complete response after the initial treatment for malignant astrocytoma. Neurol Res 1996; 18(4): 321-4.
  3. Lee HY, Na DG, Song IC, Lee DH, Seo HS, Kim JH, et al. Diffusion-tensor imaging for glioma grading at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging: analysis of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32(2): 298-303.
  4. Johnson PC, Hunt SJ, Drayer BP. Human cerebral gliomas: correlation of postmortem MR imaging and neuropathologic findings. Radiology 1989; 170(1 Pt 1): 211-7.
  5. Watanabe M, Tanaka R, Takeda N. Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology of cerebral gliomas. Neuroradiology 1992; 34(6): 463-9.
  6. Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system- a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15(7-8): 435-55.
  7. Exarchos TP, Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI. Handbook of Research on Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Imaging and Biomedical Applications. Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference; 2009.
  8. Papageorgiou TS, Chourmouzi D, Drevelengas A, Kouskouras K, Siountas A. Diffusion Tensor Imaging in brain tumors: A study on gliomas and metastases. Phys Med 2015; 31(7): 767-73.
  9. Smitha KA, Gupta AK, Jayasree RS. Total magnitude of diffusion tensor imaging as an effective tool for the differentiation of glioma. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82(5): 857-61.
  10. Stadlbauer A, Nimsky C, Buslei R, Salomonowitz E, Hammen T, Buchfelder M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and optimized fiber tracking in glioma patients: Histopathologic evaluation of tumor-invaded white matter structures. Neuroimage 2007; 34(3): 949-56.
  11. Goebell E, Paustenbach S, Vaeterlein O, Ding XQ, Heese O, Fiehler J, et al. Low-grade and anaplastic gliomas: differences in architecture evaluated with diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology 2006; 239(1): 217-22.
  12. Seunarine KK, Alexander DC. Multiple fibers: Beyond the Diffusion tensor. In: Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TEJ, editors. Diffusion MRI. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2014. p. 105-23.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 33, Issue 359 - Serial Number 359
September and October 2016
Pages 1994-1998

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 July 2015
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics