Comparison of the Effects of the Pattern Scan and Conventional Single Spot Panretinal Photocoagulation in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy; A Randomized Clinical Trial

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Feyz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Feyz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: The retinal laser photocoagulation is the gold standard treatment of the proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Nowadays, we can perform panretinal photocoagulation with single spot or pattern scan laser methods. This study aimed to compare the retinal ischemic changes and the retinal neovascularization regression between these two techniques.Methods: In a prospective clinical trial study, 146 eyes of 73 patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy was enrolled. One eye of patients was treated with single spot laser photocoagulation randomly and other eye was preserved for pattern scan laser photocoagulation. The changes of retinal ischemia on the basis of noncapillary perfusion and the regression of neovascularization on the basis of amount of leakage on fluorescein angiography were compared between the two groups after 6 months.Findings: There was no significant difference in the retinal neovascularization regression of disc and elsewhere in eyes treated with pattern scan (P = 0.26) or single spot laser (P = 0.31). While the areas of the retinal ischemia progression was significantly higher (9 cases) in group treated with pattern scan in comparison to other group (2 cases) (P = 0.02).Conclusion: The areas of retinal ischemia progression were higher after treatment with pattern scan laser compared to single spot laser. Future researches are recommended to find a better modality than the pattern scan to induce regression of the retinal ischemia similar to the single spot laser technique.

Keywords

References

  1. Luttrull JK, Sinclair SH. Safety of transfoveal subthreshold diode micropulse laser for fovea-involving diabetic macular edema in eyes with good visual acuity. Retina 2014; 34(10): 2010-20.
  2. Evans JR, Michelessi M, Virgili G. Laser photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 11: CD011234.
  3. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Ophthalmology 1991; 98(5 Suppl): 766-85.
  4. Kiire Ch, Sivaprasad S, Chong V. Subthreshold micropulse laser therapy for retinal disorders. Retina Today 2011; 67-70. [Online]. [cited 2011 Jan]; Available from: URL:http://retinatoday.com/2011/01/subthreshold-micropulse-laser-therapy-for-retinal-disorders/.
  5. Stefansson E. The therapeutic effects of retinal laser treatment and vitrectomy. A theory based on oxygen and vascular physiology. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001; 79(5): 435-40.
  6. Fong DS, Girach A, Boney A. Visual side effects of successful scatter laser photocoagulation surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a literature review. Retina 2007; 27(7): 816-24.
  7. Nagpal M, Marlecha S, Nagpal K. Comparison of laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy using 532-nm standard laser versus multispot pattern scan laser. Retina 2010; 30(3): 452-8.
  8. Sanghvi C, McLauchlan R, Delgado C, Young L, Charles SJ, Marcellino G, et al. Initial experience with the Pascal photocoagulator: a pilot study of 75 procedures. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92(8): 1061-4.
  9. Velez-Montoya R, Guerrero-Naranjo JL, Gonzalez-Mijares CC, Fromow-Guerra J, Marcellino GR, Quiroz-Mercado H, et al. Pattern scan laser photocoagulation: safety and complications, experience after 1301 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94(6): 720-4.
  10. Stefansson E. Ocular oxygenation and the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol 2006; 51(4): 364-80.
  11. Grunwald JE, Riva CE, Brucker AJ, Sinclair SH, Petrig BL. Effect of panretinal photocoagulation on retinal blood flow in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1986; 93(5): 590-5.
  12. Muraly P, Limbad P, Srinivasan K, Ramasamy K. Single session of Pascal versus multiple sessions of conventional laser for panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A comparitive study. Retina 2011; 31(7): 1359-65.
  13. Doft BH, Blankenship GW. Single versus multiple treatment sessions of argon laser panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1982; 89(7): 772-9.
  14. Yuki T, Kimura Y, Nanbu S, Kishi S, Shimizu K. Ciliary body and choroidal detachment after laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. A high-frequency ultrasound study. Ophthalmology 1997; 104(8): 1259-64.
  15. Chappelow AV, Tan K, Waheed NK, Kaiser PK. Panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: pattern scan laser versus argon laser. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153(1): 137-42.
  16. Al-Hussainy S, Dodson PM, Gibson JM. Pain response and follow-up of patients undergoing panretinal laser photocoagulation with reduced exposure times. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22(1): 96-9.
  17. Weinberger D, Ron Y, Lichter H, Rosenblat I, Axer-Siegel R, Yassur Y. Analgesic effect of topical sodium diclofenac 0.1% drops during retinal laser photocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84(2): 135-7.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 33, Issue 365 - Serial Number 365
November and December 2016
Pages 2288-2295

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 October 2015
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics