The Relationship between Cyberbullying and Psychological Well-Being of Secondary High School Students in Isfahan City

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 PhD Student, Student Research Committee, School of Medical Information and Management, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Bullying has become a growing concern among teenagers, particularly in the context of cyberbullying, where electronic devices are used to harass others. Understanding the distinct roles of cyberbullies and victims of cyberbullying concerning various dimensions of psychological well-being is crucial. Therefore, this research was conducted to determine the relationship between cyberbullying and the psychological well-being of secondary high school students in Isfahan City.
Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design, with the research population consisting of high school students in Isfahan in 2021-2022. A stratified sampling method was used to select 1051 students, and data were collected through a checklist and three questionnaires, namely cyberbullying by Antoniado et. al. and an 18-item psychological well-being scale by Ryff.
Findings: There was an inverse and significant relationship between cyberbullying and psychological well-being and its dimensions (except independence and positive relationship with others). There was an inverse and significant relationship between cyber victimization and psychological well-being and its dimensions (except purposefulness).
Conclusion: The study highlights that high school students involved in cyberbullying and cyber victimization are susceptible to adverse consequences, leading to a decline in their psychological well-being.  Parents, teachers, and officials of the education organization must be well aware of how teenagers participate in bullying, as well as the consequences and variables affecting it.

Highlights

Mostafa Amini Rarani: Google Scholar

Zahra Heydari: Google Scholar 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Jadambaa A, Thomas HJ, Scott JG, Graves N, Brain D, Pacella R. Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2019; 53(9): 878-88.
  2. Evangelio C, Rodriguez-Gonzalez P, Fernandez-Rio J, Gonzalez-Villora S. Cyberbullying in elementary and middle school students: A systematic review. Computers & Education 2022; 176: 104356.
  3. Aizenkot D, Kashy-Rosenbaum G. WhatsApp cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Israel: A pilot research. Educational Counseling 2017; 20(12): 363-89.
  4. Kazan H. Cyber Bullying and Violence Literacy in the Context of Digitalization. Research Anthology on Combating Cyber-Aggression and Online Negativity: IGI Global; 2022. p. 496-519.
  5. Karmakar S, Das S, editors. Understanding the rise of

    Twitter-based cyberbullying due to COVID-19 through comprehensive statistical evaluation. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii international Conference on System Sciences. Maui, Hawaii (Virtual); 2021.
  6. Kee DMH, Al‐Anesi MAL, Al‐Anesi SAL. Cyberbullying on social media under the influence of COVID‐19. Global Business and Organizational Excellence 2022; 41(6): 11-22.
  7. Barlett CP, Simmers MM, Roth B, Gentile D. Comparing cyberbullying prevalence and process before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Soc Psychol 2021; 161(4): 408-18.
  8. Polanin JR, Espelage DL, Grotpeter JK, Ingram K, Michaelson L, Spinney E, Valido A. America El Sheikh, Cagil Torgal, Luz Robinson. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Prev Sci 2022; 23(3): 439-54.
  9. Karin H, Laura L. Cyberbullying and psychologicalwell-being in young adolescence: the potential protective mediation efects of social support from family, friends, and teachers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 17(1): 45.
  10. Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 2008; 49(4): 376-85.
  11. Chesney T, Coyne I, Logan B, Madden N. Griefing in virtual worlds: causes, casualties and coping strategies. Information Systems Journal 2009; 19(6): 525-48.
  12. Montes Á, Sanmarco J, Novo M, Cea B, Arce R. Estimating the psychological harm consequence of bullying victimization: a meta-analytic review for forensic evaluation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(21): 13852.
  13. Kutok ER, Dunsiger S, Patena JV, Nugent NR, Riese A, Rosen RK, Ranney ML. A cyberbullying media-based prevention intervention for adolescents on instagram: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health 2021; 8(9): e26029.
  14. Fiddiana N, Priyambodo AB. The correlation between self-control and cyberbullying at private high school X in bogor. KnE Social Sciences 2022: 2021: 255–66.
  15. Agley J, Jun M, Eldridge L, Agley DL, Xiao Y, Sussman S, et al. Effects of ACT Out! social issue theater on social-emotional competence and bullying in youth and adolescents: Cluster randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health 2021; 8(1): e25860.
  16. Faircloth AL. Resilience as a mediator of the relationship between negative life events and psychological well-being [Thesis]. Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern University; 2017.
  17. Arabi P, Bagheri N, Mirhashemi M. The prediction dependency on virtual social networks based on alexithymia, attachment styles, well-being psychological and loneliness. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 2021; 9(1): 66-76.
  18. Garaigordobil M, Mollo-Torrico JP, Machimbarrena JM, Páez D. Cyberaggression in adolescents of Bolivia: Connection with psychopathological symptoms, adaptive and predictor variables. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(3): 1022.
  19. Martínez J, Rodríguez-Hidalgo AJ, Zych I. Bullying and cyberbullying in adolescents from disadvantaged areas: Validation of questionnaires; prevalence rates; and relationship to self-esteem, empathy and social skills. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(17): 6199.
  20. 20 Zhang X, Han Z, Ba Z. Cyberbullying involvement and psychological distress among Chinese adolescents: the moderating effects of family cohesion and school cohesion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(23): 8938.
  21. Nixon CL. Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2014; 5: 143-58.
  22. Katzer C, Fetchenhauer D, Belschak F. Cyberbullying: Who are the victims?: A comparison of victimization in internet chatrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 2009; 21(1): 25-36.
  23. Mason KL. Cyberbullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools 2008; 45(4): 323-48.
  24. Hellfeldt K, López-Romero L, Andershed H. Cyberbullying and psychological well-being in young adolescence: the potential protective mediation effects of social support from family, friends, and teachers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(1): 45.
  25. Uslu NA, Durak HY. Parental awareness and supervision to prevent cyberbullying: Scale adaptation and a review in terms of demographic variables. Children and Youth Services Review 2022; 133: 106329.
  26. Arató N, Zsidó A, Rivnyák A, Péley B, Lábadi B. Risk and protective factors in cyberbullying: the role of family, social support and emotion regulation. Int J Bullying Prev 2022; 4(2): 160-73.
  27. Antoniadou N , Kokkinos CM, Markos A. Possible common correlates between bullying and cyber-bullying among adolescents. Psicología Educativa 2016; 22(1): 27-38.
  28. Antoniadou N, Kokkinos CM, Markos A. Development, construct validation and measurement invariance of the Greek cyber-bullying/victimization experiences questionnaire (CBVEQ-G). Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 65: 380-90.
  29. Basharpoor S, Zardi B. Psychometric properties of Cyber-Bullying/Victimization Experiences Questionnaire (CBVEQ) in students [in Persian]. Journal of School Psychology 2019; 8(1): 43-57.
  30. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology 1989; 57(6): 1069-81.
  31. Kafka GJ, Kozma A. The construct validity of Ryff's scales of psychological well-being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research 2002; 57: 171-90.
  32. Khanjani M, Shahidi S, Fathabadi J, Mazaheri MA, Shokri O. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Ryff’s scale of Psychological well-being, short form (18-item) among male and female students. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology 2014; 9(32): 27-36.
  33. Talaei M, Sharifi S, Kadkhodaei M. The effect of ethnic-cultural empathy on cyberbullying with a moderating role of personality traits (Case study: Secondary school girls in Isfahan) [in Persian]. Journal of Social Sciences 2022; 19(1): 191-218.
  34. Thai TT, Duong MHT, Vo DK, Dang NTT, Huynh
    QNH, Tran HGN. Cyber-victimization and its association with depression among Vietnamese adolescents. PeerJ 2022; 10: e12907.
  35. Gámez-Guadix M, Orue I, Smith PK, Calvete E. Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2013; 53(4): 446-52.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 42, Issue 773
1st Week, September
September and October 2024
Pages 545-552

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 June 2024
  • Accept Date: 17 September 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics