Comparison of the Effect of Two Oral Acifen and Gabapentin Drugs on Pain Prevention Following Photorefractive Keratectomy Surgery

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Student of Medicine, School of Medicine And Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: There are many techniques to eliminate eye refractive errors. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is one of these techniques. This technique causes intensive post-surgical pain due to stimulation of pain receptors in the corneal epithelium. In this study we compared the effect of two systemic drugs (acifen and gabapentin) on pain relief following this surgery.Methods: In this double blind clinical trial, 100 patients with refractive errors were divided into two groups with 50 members. One group of patients received gabapentin tablets (300 mg) every 8 hours for three days, and the other group received acifen capsules containing 325 mg acetaminophen, 200 mg ibuprofen, and 40 mg caffeine every 8 hours for three days. The Patients’ pain was measured through Faces Pain Scale (FPS). According to the findings, pain variables, level of drowsiness, severity of dizziness, patient satisfaction and drug side-effects (before administration of drug, and 2 hours after receiving each dosage) were determined, and compared between the two groups.Findings: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age and sex. Pain assessment score median (P = 0.062), frequency of dizziness severity (P = 0.815), relative frequency of nausea and vomiting scores (P = 0.085), relative frequency of patient’s satisfaction rate (P = 0.293), and frequency of drug side-effects (frequency in both groups equal to zero and P = 1) in the patients of the two groups were not significantly different. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed no significant difference in comparing the two methods and considering other variables such as side effects, ease of use, and satisfaction rate. Both methods can be used as successful methods to control pain in Photorefractive Keratectomy surgery. However, comparing either of the drugs with other methods of controlling pain seems necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Espandar L, Meyer J. Intraoperative and Post-operative Complications of Laser in situ Kera-tomileusis Flap Creation Using IntraLase Femto-second Laser and Mechanical Microkeratomes. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2010; 17(1): 56-9.
  2. Buyukyildiz HZ, Gulkilik G. LASIK Complica-tion due to Laser Firing Failure and its Manage-ment. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2010; 1-3.
  3. Moshirfar M, Gardiner JP, Schliesser JA, Espan-dar L, Feiz V, Mifflin MD, et al. Laser in situ ker-atomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retro-spective comparison. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36(11): 1925-33.
  4. Shah S, Sebai Sarhan AR, Doyle SJ, Pillai CT, Dua HS. The epithelial flap for photorefractive keratectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85(4): 393-6.
  5. Saleh TA, Almasri MA. A comparative study of post-operative pain in laser epithelial kera-tomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy. Surgeon 2003; 1(4): 229-32.
  6. Brahma A, McGhee CN. Surgical correction of refractive errors. J R Soc Med 2000; 93(3): 118-23.
  7. Ho KY, Gan TJ, Habib AS. Gabapentin and postoperative pain--a systematic review of ran-domized controlled trials. Pain 2006; 126(1-3): 91-101.
  8. Lee JB, Seong GJ, Lee JH, Seo KY, Lee YG, Kim EK. Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileu-sis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27(4): 565-70.
  9. Brilakis HS, Deutsch TA. Topical tetracaine with bandage soft contact lens pain control after pho-torefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 2000; 16(4): 444-7.
  10. Engle AT, Laurent JM, Schallhorn SC, Toman SD, Newacheck JS, Tanzer DJ, et al. Masked comparison of silicone hydrogel lotrafilcon A and etafilcon A extended-wear bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cat-aract Refract Surg 2005; 31(4): 681-6.
  11. Verma S, Corbett MC, Marshall J. A prospective, randomized, double-masked trial to evaluate the role of topical anesthetics in controlling pain af-ter photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1995; 102(12): 1918-24.
  12. Baillie JK, Power I. The mechanism of action of gabapentin in neuropathic pain. Curr Opin In-vestig Drugs 2006; 7(1): 33-9.
  13. Ng GY, Bertrand S, Sullivan R, Ethier N, Wang J, Yergey J, et al. Gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptors with specific heterodimer composi-tion and postsynaptic actions in hippocampal neurons are targets of anticonvulsant gabapen-tin action. Mol Pharmacol 2001; 59(1): 144-52.
  14. Nissman SA, Tractenberg RE, Babbar-Goel A, Pasternak JF. Oral gabapentin for the treatment of postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145(4): 623-9.
  15. Lichtinger A, Purcell TL, Schanzlin DJ, Chayet AS. Gabapentin for postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Refract Surg 2011; 27(8): 613-7.
  16. Kuhnle MD, Ryan DS, Coe CD, Eaddy J, Kuzmowych C, Edwards J, et al. Oral gabapentin for photorefractive keratectomy pain. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37(2): 364-9.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 29, Issue 163 - Serial Number 163
September and October 2012
Pages 2026-2032

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 June 2011
  • Revise Date: 29 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics