Comparing the Results of Visual Inspection of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy Specimens with Pathology Outcomes in Patients with Breast Tumors

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Student of Medicine, Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: The core needle biopsy (CNB) is a commonly used method and a gold standard for the diagnosis of breast lesions. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of visual inspection of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy specimens with pathology outcomes in patients with breast tumors.Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 600 patients with breast tumors who were candidates for core needle biopsy with ultrasonography were entered into the study according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, samples were taken by a radiologist who categorized the breast mass to malignant or benign according to its consistency and shape, based on observation, as well as the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS). The results of the core specimen categorization were compared with the pathology outcomes.Findings: The sensitivity and specificity of the core specimen categorization were 97.48% and 94.10%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of this test were 85.64% and 99.05%, respectively.Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of the visual inspection of core specimen was high for detecting the type of mass. So, it can increase the accuracy of the biopsy of the breast lesions, especially in sizes less than 10 mm, reduce the number of cores taken from the lesion, and give the patient a relative assurance of benign lesion at the same time as performing a biopsy to remove his/her anxiety earlier.

Keywords

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136(5): E359-E386.
  2. Mousavi SM, Montazeri A, Mohagheghi MA, Jarrahi AM, Harirchi I, Najafi M, et al. Breast cancer in Iran: AN epidemiological review. Breast J 2007; 13(4): 383-91.
  3. Roohparvarzade N. Prevalence of risk factors for breast cancer in women (20 to 69 Years old) in Isfahan 2012-2013. Iran J Breast Dis 2014; 7(1): 52-61. [In Persian].
  4. Ghiasvand R, Maram ES, Tahmasebi S, Tabatabaee SH. Risk factors for breast cancer among young women in southern Iran. Int J Cancer 2011; 129(6): 1443-9.
  5. Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Yoon JH, Kim EK. Risks of being malignant or high risk and their characteristics in breast lesions 20 mm or Larger after benign results on ultrasonography-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy. Ultrasound Q 2016; 32(2): 157-63.
  6. DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA. Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology - annual advances in oncology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011.
  7. Rakha EA, Ellis IO. Triple-negative/basal-like breast cancer: Review. Pathology 2009; 41(1): 40-7.
  8. Elias AD. Triple-negative breast cancer: a short review. Am J Clin Oncol 2010; 33(6): 637-45.
  9. Mohajeri G, Khezreh H, Mehrabi Kushki A, Mohajeri H, Mohajeri M, Faghihi M. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy for breast cancer detection. J Isfahan Med Sch 2012; 30(175): 32-9. [In Persian].
  10. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, Creech WE, Butler PF, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
  11. Radhakrishna S, Gayathri A, Chegu D. Needle core biopsy for breast lesions: An audit of 467 needle core biopsies. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2013; 34(4): 252-6.
  12. Dzierzanowski M, Melville KA, Barnes PJ, MacIntosh RF, Caines JS, Porter GA. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: Correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins. J Surg Oncol 2005; 90(2): 71-6.
  13. Apple SK. Variability in gross and microscopic pathology reporting in excisional biopsies of breast cancer tissue. Breast J 2006; 12(2): 145-9.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 36, Issue 469 - Serial Number 469
January and February 2018
Pages 148-155

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 December 2017
  • Revise Date: 29 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics