Comparison of the Effect of Spinal, Epidural, and Combined of Neuroaxial Anesthesia on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Normal Vaginal Delivery: A Clinical Trial Study

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Natural delivery process is accompanied by severe pain during labor, and various ways of reducing it have been presented so far, of them, spinal anesthesia is one of the most commonly used methods. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of spinal, epidural, and combined neuroaxial anesthesia on the maternal and fetal outcomes of normal vaginal delivery.Methods: In a clinical trial study, 105 pregnant women candidates for normal delivery were randomly assigned to three groups of 35. To reduce labor pain, the first group was under spinal anesthesia, the second under epidural anesthesia, and the third under combined anesthesia. The incidences of maternal and neonatal complications were determined and compared between the three groups.Findings: The mean Apgar scores of 1st and 5th seconds were not significantly different between the three groups, but the mean duration of stage two was significantly less in the group under epidural anesthesia (32.66 ± 7.57 minutes) compared to those in spinal (36.28 ± 6.38 minutes) and combined anesthesia (35.78 ± 7.39 minutes) (P = 0.027). Other complications, including bleeding and mortality, were not significantly different between the study groups.Conclusion: The incidence of maternal and fetal complications in the three groups under the spinal, epidural, and combined anesthesia did not show a significant difference, but the duration of the second stage of delivery was significantly lower in the group of epidural anesthesia. Therefore, it seems that the use of epidural anesthesia is preferable to the spinel and combined anesthesia to reduce delivery pain.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdallah MW, Elzayyat NS, Abdelhaq MM, Gado AAM. A comparative study of general anesthesia versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia on the fetus in cesarean section. Egypt J Anaesth 2014; 30(2): 155-60.
  2. Raja D, Kumar D. Randomized Double blind study on obstertic and fetal outcome with two different doses of epidurally administered bupivacaine in combined spinal epidural labour analgesia. Indian J Appl Res 2018; 8(2): 38-40.
  3. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 5: CD000331.
  4. Gambling D, Berkowitz J, Farrell TR, Pue A, Shay D. A randomized controlled comparison of epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in a private practice setting: pain scores during first and second stages of labor and at delivery. Anesth Analg 2013; 116(3): 636-43.
  5. Wahdan AS, El-Sakka AI, Gaafar HMI. The effect of addition of dexamethasone to levobupivacaine in parturients receiving combined spinal-epidural for analgesia for vaginal delivery. Indian J Anaesth 2017; 61(7): 556-61.
  6. Hussain U, Tahir A, Javaid Y, Nazeer T, Hussain R. Patient's preference regarding general or regional anaesthesia for elective cesarean section. Pak J Med Health Sci 2018; 11(1): 409-10.
  7. Solangi SA, Siddiqui SM, Khaskheli MS, Siddiqui MA. Comparison of the effects of general vs spinal anesthesia on neonatal outcome. Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care 2012; 16(1): 18-23.
  8. Nakamura G, Ganem EM, Rugolo LM, Castiglia YM. Effects on mother and fetus of epidural and combined spinal-epidural techniques for labor analgesia. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2009; 55(4): 405-9.
  9. Tan DJA, Sultana R, Han NLR, Sia ATH, Sng BL. Investigating determinants for patient satisfaction in women receiving epidural analgesia for labour pain: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol 2018; 18(1): 50.
  10. Rasheed N, Khan MH, Rasheed N. Comparison of Incidence of Low Back Pain in Women with Normal Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section. J Pak Ortho Assoc 2017; 29(4): 14-8.
  11. Small K. The trouble with normal birth. Australian Midwifery News 2018; 18(1): 21-3.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 36, Issue 503 - Serial Number 503
September and October 2019
Pages 1369-1375

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 August 2018
  • Revise Date: 30 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics