Comparison of the Therapeutic Effect of Proximal Row Carpectomy and Midcarpal Artherodesis in Patients with Scaphoid Fracture and Dislocation

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Professor. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Resident, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Fracture or dislocation of scaphoid are commonly present in carpal tunnel bones, which is associated with complications such as scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic effect of proximal row carpectomy (MCA) and midcarpal artherodesis (PRC) in the patients with SNAC and SLAC in stage 2.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30 patients with SNAC (21 patients) and SLAC (9 people) underwent PRC or MCA surgery in years 2015-2016 were included. According to the type of PRC or MCA surgical technique, the patients were divided into two groups, and factors such as the pain severity, range of motion (ROM), and grip strength were investigated at 2, 6, and 12 months intervals after the surgery.Findings: The mean pain severities at 2, 6, and 12 months after surgery were 3.30, 2.50, and 0.75 in the PRC group and 1.85, 1.01 and 0.35 in the MCA group, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups based on the severity of pain 2 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference based on severity of pain 12 months after operation (P = 0.28). There was also no significant difference between the two groups based on the ROM and the grip strength (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Postoperative pain in patients with MCA is less than those with PRC, but there is no difference between the two methods in ROM and grip strength.

Keywords

References

  1. Aita MA, Nakano EK, Schaffhausser HL, Fukushima WY, Fujiki EN. Randomized clinical trial between proximal row carpectomy and the four-corner fusion for patients with stage II SNAC. Rev Bras Ortop 2016; 51(5): 574-82.
  2. Krakauer JD, Bishop AT, Cooney WP. Surgical treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19(5): 751-9.
  3. Wolff AL, Garg R, Kraszewski AP, Hillstrom HJ, Hafer JF, Backus SI, et al. Surgical treatments for scapholunate advanced collapse wrist: Kinematics and functional performance. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40(8): 1547-53.
  4. Watson HK, Ryu J. Evolution of arthritis of the wrist. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; (202): 57-67.
  5. Dacho AK, Baumeister S, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Comparison of proximal row carpectomy and midcarpal arthrodesis for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC-wrist) and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC-wrist) in stage II. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61(10): 1210-8.
  6. Trehan SK, Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Scapholunate advanced collapse: Nomenclature and differential diagnosis. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40(10): 2085-9.
  7. Baumeister S, Trankle M, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Aktuelles Therapiekonzept zur Behandlung des fortgeschrittenen karpalen Kollapses nach Skaphoidpseudarthrose (SNAC-Wrist). Akt Traumatol 2002; 32(06): 270-7. [In German].
  8. Ashmead D, Watson HK, Damon C, Herber S, Paly W. Scapholunate advanced collapse wrist salvage. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19(5): 741-50.
  9. Delclaux S, Israel D, Apredoaei C, Rongieres M, Mansat P. Proximal row carpectomy on manual workers: 17 patients followed for an average of 6 years. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35(6): 401-6.
  10. Saffar P, Fakhoury B. Resection of the proximal carpal bones versus partial arthrodesis in carpal instability. Ann Chir Main Memb Super 1992; 11(4): 276-80. [In French].
  11. Wyrick JD, Stern PJ, Kiefhaber TR. Motion-preserving procedures in the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20(6): 965-70.
  12. Baumeister S, Germann G, Dragu A, Trankle M, Sauerbier M. Functional results after proximal row carpectomy (PRC) in patients with SNAC-/SLAC-wrist stage II. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2005; 37(2): 106-12. [In German].
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 36, Issue 509 - Serial Number 509
November and December 2019
Pages 1566-1571

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 September 2018
  • Revise Date: 09 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics