Comparison of the Effects of Intravenous or Subcutaneous Administration of Metoclopramide on Pain and Nausea after Lower Abdominal Surgery

Document Type : Original Article (s)

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Student of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Pain and nausea after surgery under general anesthesia are common complications, that if not controlled, can lead to increased postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intravenous and subcutaneous injection of metoclopramide on pain and nausea after lower abdominal surgery.Methods: This study was performed as a double-blind randomized clinical trial on 75 patients aged 18 to 65 years, class 1 and 2 in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scale, candidates for elective lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into three groups of 25 patients receiving 0.15 mg/kg metoclopramide intravenously (group 1), subcutaneously (group 2), and normal saline (control, group 3). Intensity of pain and nausea, patient satisfaction, hemodynamic parameters, drug side effects, and rescue analgesic and antiemetic use were compared in three groups.Findings: Intensity of the pain and nausea were significantly lower in the intravenous group than in the placebo and subcutaneous groups. Moreover, patients' satisfaction in the intravenous and subcutaneous groups were significantly higher than the placebo group. The mean arterial blood pressure and abdominal cramps were significantly lower in the intravenous group than in the other two groups; but flushing frequency in the intravenous group was significantly higher than the two other groups.Conclusion: Intravenous injection of metoclopramide had better effects in controlling pain and nausea in comparison with subcutaneous injection and placebo in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, et al. Management of postoperative pain: A clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain 2016; 17(2): 131-57.
  2. Vahabi S, Abaszadeh A, Yari F, Yousefi N. Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting among pre- and postmenopausal women undergoing cystocele and rectocele repair surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2015; 68(6): 581-5.
  3. Ige O, Kolawole I, Bolaji B. Opioid-sparing effect of bupivacaine wound infiltration after lower abdominal operations. J West Afr Coll Surg 2011; 1(3): 62-82.
  4. Erbabacan E, Kendigelen P, Koksal GM, Tutuncu C, Ekici BB, Seker TB, et al. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block and IV patient-controlled analgesia after lower abdominal surgery. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2015; 43(1): 24-8.
  5. Farhat K. Farhat K, Pasha AK, Kazi WA. Comparison of ondansetronand metoclopramide for PONV Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Anesthe Clinic Res 4(3): 297.
  6. Shabanian S, Kalbasi S, Shabanian G, Khoram B, Ganji F. The effect of metoclopramide addition to lidocaine on pain of patients with grades II and III post-episiotomy repair. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11(4): QC11-QC14.
  7. Isazadehfar K, Entezariasl M, Shahbazzadegan B, Nourani Z, Shafaee Y. The comparative study of ondansetron and metoclopramide effects in reducing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Med Iran 2017; 55(4): 254-8.
  8. Gibbs RD, Movinsky BA, Pellegrini J, Vacchiano CA. The morphine-sparing effect of metoclopramide on postoperative laparoscopic tubal ligation patients. AANA J 2002; 70(1): 27-32.
  9. De Oliveira GSJ, Castro-Alves LJ, Chang R, Yaghmour E, McCarthy RJ. Systemic metoclopramide to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: A meta-analysis without Fujii's studies. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109(5): 688-97.
  10. Kelly AM, Ardagh M, Curry C, D'Antonio J, Zebic S. Intravenous chlorpromazine versus intramuscular sumatriptan for acute migraine. J Accid Emerg Med 1997; 14(4): 209-11.
  11. Quaynor H, Raeder JC. Incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting are similar after metoclopramide 20 mg and ondansetron 8 mg given by the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46(1): 109-13.
  12. Madej TH, Simpson KH. Comparison of the use of domperidone, droperidol and metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting following gynaecological surgery in day cases. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58(8): 879-83.
  13. Moradi-Farsani D, Azamian-Jazi Z, Heydari SM, Nazemroaya B. The effect of subcutaneous injection of metoclopramide, pethidine, and ketamine on postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia. J Isfahan Med Sch 2020; 38(572): 252-9. [In Persian].
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 39, Issue 641 - Serial Number 641
September and October 2021
Pages 681-687

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 May 2021
  • Revise Date: 01 May 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics