Journal of Isfahan Medical School

Journal of Isfahan Medical School

TiO2 nanoparticles as a sonosensitizer for sonodynamic therapy: A Systematic Review of in Vitro Studies

Document Type : Review Article

Authors
1 MSc Student, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Introduction, Isfahan, Iran
10.48305/jims.v44.i852.0241
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have demonstrated suitable potential for use in sonodynamic therapy due to their stability and non-toxicity. Despite this, systematic in vitro studies are rare. An aim of this systematic review is to investigate the increasing role of TiO2 nanoparticles in sonodynamic therapy as well as factors contributing to their efficacy.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on Scopus, Web of science, and PubMed. A total of 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected and cell viability was examined under sonodynamic therapy with and without TiO2 nanoparticles in different cell lines.
Results: The findings indicated that TiO₂ nanoparticles have minimal intrinsic toxicity but significantly enhance cancer cell death when combined with ultrasound waves. Factors such as ultrasound intensity, the size, and the band gap of TiO2 nanoparticles play a critical role in this synergistic effect.
Discussion: A reduced band gap in TiO₂ nanoparticles leads to increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby enhancing cell death. Moreover, surface coatings such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and cancer cell membranes improve the stability, dispersion, and targeting capability of the nanoparticles. Optimal ultrasound intensity further maximizes therapeutic efficiency.
Conclusion: In vitro studies suggest that TiO₂ nanoparticles are effective sonosensitizers for SDT against cancer cells and optimizing nanoparticle characteristics and ultrasound parameters can enhance treatment efficacy while minimizing side effects on healthy tissues.

Highlights

Ali Salarvand: Google Scholar, PubMed

 Javad Garshad: Google Scholar, PubMed

 Mahsa Mansourian: Google Scholar, PubMed

Keywords
Subjects

1.     Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality  Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71(3): 209–49.
2.     Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 2011; 331(6024): 1559–64.
3.     Levinson AD. Cancer therapy reform. Science 2010. 2010; 328(5975): 137.
4.     Couzin J. Can Fasting Blunt Chemotherapy’s Debilitating Side Effects? Science 2008; 321(5893): 1146-7.
5.     Kalbasi A, Komar C, Tooker GM, Liu M, Lee JW, Gladney WL, et al. Tumor-derived CCL2 mediates resistance to radiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23(1): 137–48.
6.     Smyth MJ, Godfrey DI, Trapani JA. A fresh look at tumor immunosurveillance and immunotherapy. Nat Immunol 2001; 2(4): 293–9.
7.     Mosaddad SA, Namanloo RA, Aghili SS, Maskani P, Alam M, Abbasi K, et al. Photodynamic therapy in oral cancer: a review of clinical studies. Med Oncol 2023; 40(3): 91.
8.     Sharman WM, Allen CM, Van Lier JE. Photodynamic therapeutics: basic principles and clinical applications. Drug Discov Today 1999; 4(11): 507–17.
9.     Sobhani N, Samadani AA. Implications of photodynamic cancer therapy: An overview of PDT mechanisms basically and practically. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2021; 33: 1–13.
10.  Bacellar IOL, Tsubone TM, Pavani C, Baptista MS. Photodynamic efficiency: from molecular photochemistry to cell death. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16(9): 20523–59.
11.  Hou Y, Yang X, Liu R, Zhao D, Guo C, Zhu A, et al. Pathological mechanism of photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy based on nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020; 15: 6827–38.
12.  Maharjan PS, Bhattarai HK. Singlet oxygen, photodynamic therapy, and mechanisms of cancer cell death. J Oncol 2022; 2022(1): 7211485.
13.  Qian X, Zheng Y, Chen Y. Micro/nanoparticle‐augmented sonodynamic therapy (SDT): breaking the depth shallow of photoactivation. Adv Mater. 2016; 28(37): 8097–129.
14.  Rengeng L, Qianyu Z, Yuehong L, Zhongzhong P, Libo L. Sonodynamic therapy, a treatment developing from photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2017;19:159–66.
15.  Zhang N, Zeng W, Xu Y, Li R, Wang M, Liu Y, et al. Pyroptosis Induction with Nanosonosensitizer‐Augmented Sonodynamic Therapy Combined with PD‐L1 Blockade Boosts Efficacy against Liver Cancer. Adv Healthc Mater 2024; 13(7): 2302606.
16.  Zlotver I, Sosnik A. Glucosylated Hybrid TiO 2 / Polymer Nanomaterials for Actively Targeted Sonodynamic Therapy of Cancer. Small 2024; 20(4): e2305475.
17.  Liang S, Deng X, Ma P, Cheng Z, Lin J. Recent advances in nanomaterial‐assisted combinational sonodynamic cancer therapy. Adv Mater 2020; 32(47): 2003214.
18.  Son S, Kim JH, Wang X, Zhang C, Yoon SA, Shin J, et al. Multifunctional sonosensitizers in sonodynamic cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev 2020; 49(11): 3244–61.
19.  Han X, Huang J, Jing X, Yang D, Lin H, Wang Z, et al. Oxygen-deficient black titania for synergistic/enhanced sonodynamic and photoinduced cancer therapy at near infrared-II biowindow. ACS Nano 2018; 12(5): 4545–55.
20.  Ren W, Wang H, Chang Q, Li N, Yang J, Hu S. Origin of sonocatalytic activity of fluorescent carbon dots. Carbon N Y 2021;184:102–8.
21.  Yumita N, Nishigaki R, Umemura K, Umemura S. Hematoporphyrin as a sensitizer of cell‐damaging effect of ultrasound. Japanese J Cancer Res 1989; 80(3): 219–22.
22.  Zhu J, Chu C, Li D, Pang X, Zheng H, Wang J, et al. Fe (III)‐Porphyrin Sonotheranostics: a Green Triple‐Regulated ROS generation nanoplatform for enhanced cancer imaging and therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(36):1904056.
23.  Ma A, Chen H, Cui Y, Luo Z, Liang R, Wu Z, et al. Metalloporphyrin complex‐based nanosonosensitizers for deep‐tissue tumor theranostics by noninvasive sonodynamic therapy. Small 2019; 15(5): 1804028.
24.  Wang X, Zhong X, Bai L, Xu J, Gong F, Dong Z, et al. Ultrafine Titanium Monoxide (TiO1+ x) Nanorods for Enhanced Sonodynamic Therapy. J Am Chem Soc 2020; 142(14): 6527–37.
25.  You DG, Deepagan VG, Um W, Jeon S, Son S, Chang H, et al. ROS-generating TiO2 nanoparticles for non-invasive sonodynamic therapy of cancer. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1): 23200.
26.  Gong F, Cheng L, Yang N, Gong Y, Ni Y, Bai S, et al. Preparation of TiH1. 924 nanodots by liquid-phase exfoliation for enhanced sonodynamic cancer therapy. Nat Commun 2020; 11(1): 3712.
27.  Wu Q, Zhang F, Pan X, Huang Z, Zeng Z, Wang H, et al. Surface wettability of nanoparticle modulated sonothrombolysis. Adv Mater 2021; 33(25): 2007073.
28.  Suslick KS. Sonochemistry. Science 1990; 247(4949): 1439–45.
29.  Serpe L, Foglietta F, Canaparo R. Nanosonotechnology: the next challenge in cancer sonodynamic therapy. Nanotechnol Rev 2012; 1(2): 173–82.
30.  Wang S, Gao R, Zhou F, Selke M. Nanomaterials and singlet oxygen photosensitizers: potential applications in photodynamic therapy. J Mater Chem 2004; 14(4): 487–93.
31.  Pang X, Xiao Q, Cheng Y, Ren E, Lian L, Zhang Y, et al. Bacteria-responsive nanoliposomes as smart sonotheranostics for multidrug resistant bacterial infections. ACS Nano 2019; 13(2): 2427–38.
32.  Um W, Ko H, You DG, Lim S, Kwak G, Shim MK, et al. Necroptosis‐Inducible Polymeric Nanobubbles for Enhanced Cancer Sonoimmunotherapy. Adv Mater 2020; 32(16): 1907953.
33.  Deepagan VG, You DG, Um W, Ko H, Kwon S, Choi KY, Yi GR, Lee JY, Lee DS, Kim K, Kwon IC. Long-circulating Au-TiO2 nanocomposite as a sonosensitizer for ROS-mediated eradication of cancer. Nano Lett 2016; 16(10): 6257-64.
34.  McHale AP, Callan JF, Nomikou N, Fowley C, Callan B. Sonodynamic Therapy: Concept, Mechanism and Application to Cancer Treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016; 880: 429–50.
35.  Guan X, Yin H, Xu X, Xu G, Zhang Y, Zhou B, et al. Tumor metabolism‐engineered composite nanoplatforms potentiate sonodynamic therapy via reshaping tumor microenvironment and facilitating electron–hole pairs’ separation. Adv Funct Mater 2020; 30(27): 2000326.
36.  Han M, Zhu S, Lu S, Song Y, Feng T, Tao S, et al. Recent progress on the photocatalysis of carbon dots: Classification, mechanism and applications. Nano Today 2018; 19: 201–18.
37.  Valero-Romero MJ, Santaclara JG, Oar-Arteta L, Van Koppen L, Osadchii DY, Gascon J, et al. Photocatalytic properties of TiO2 and Fe-doped TiO2 prepared by metal organic framework-mediated synthesis. Chem Eng J. 2019;360:75–88.
38.  Ganesh I, Kumar PP, Gupta AK, Sekhar PSC, Radha K, Padmanabham G, et al. Preparation and characterization of Fe-doped TiO 2 powders for solar light response and photocatalytic applications. Process Appl Ceram 2012; 6(1): 21–36.
39.  Pang YL, Abdullah AZ. Fe3+ doped TiO2 nanotubes for combined adsorption–sonocatalytic degradation of real textile wastewater. Appl Catal B Environ 2013; 129: 473–81.
40.  Cao Y, Wu T, Dai W, Dong H, Zhang X. TiO2 nanosheets with the Au nanocrystal-decorated edge for mitochondria-targeting enhanced sonodynamic therapy. Chemistry of Materials 2019; 31(21): 9105-14.
41.  Shen S, Wu L, Liu J, Xie M, Shen H, Qi X, et al. Core-shell structured Fe3O4@TiO2-doxorubicin nanoparticles for targeted  chemo-sonodynamic therapy of cancer. Int J Pharm 2015; 486(1–2): 380–8.
42.  Wang X, Wang X, Zhong X, Li G, Yang Z, Gong Y, et al. V-TiO2nanospindles with regulating tumor microenvironment performance for enhanced sonodynamic cancer therapy. Appl Phys Rev 2020; 7(4).
43.  Harada Y, Ogawa K, Irie Y, Endo H, Feril LBJ, Uemura T, et al. Ultrasound activation of TiO2 in melanoma tumors. J Control Release 2011; 149(2): 190–5.
44.  Wang X, Wang W, Yu L, Tang Y, Cao J, Chen Y. Site-specific sonocatalytic tumor suppression by chemically engineered single-crystalline mesoporous titanium dioxide sonosensitizers. J Mater Chem B 2017; 5(24): 4579–86.
45.  Shen J, Karges J, Xiong K, Chen Y, Ji L, Chao H. Cancer cell membrane camouflaged iridium complexes functionalized black-titanium nanoparticles for hierarchical-targeted synergistic NIR-II photothermal and sonodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 2021; 275: 120979.
46.  Moosavi Nejad S, Takahashi H, Hosseini H, Watanabe A, Endo H, Narihira K, et al. Acute effects of sono-activated photocatalytic titanium dioxide nanoparticles on oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ultrason Sonochem 2016; 32: 95–101.
47.  Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700.
48.  Xu WW, Dong CH, Hu H, Qian XQ, Chang L, Jiang Q, et al. Engineering Janus Chemoreactive Nanosonosensitizers for Bilaterally Augmented Sonodynamic and Chemodynamic Cancer Nanotherapy. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31(37): 2103134.
49.  Wang X, Zhong X, Bai L, Xu J, Gong F, Dong Z, et al. Ultrafine titanium monoxide (TiO1+ x) nanorods for enhanced sonodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc 2020; 142(14): 6527–37.
50.  Sun W, Dong X, Huang P, Shan J, Qi L, Zhou J. Solvothermal synthesis of Nb-doped TiO2nanoparticles with enhanced sonodynamic effects for destroying tumors. RSC Adv 2021; 11(58): 36920–7.
51.  Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi H, Narita T, Kanehira K, Sonezaki S, Kudo N, et al. Sonodynamic therapy using water-dispersed TiO2-polyethylene glycol compound on glioma cells: Comparison of cytotoxic mechanism with photodynamic therapy. Ultrason Sonochem 2011; 18(5): 1197–204.
52.  Luo J, Cao J, Ma G, Wang X, Sun Y, Zhang C, et al. Collagenase-Loaded H-TiO2Nanoparticles Enhance Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Sonodynamic Therapy in a Pancreatic Carcinoma Xenograft Model via Digesting Stromal Barriers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022; 14(36): 40535–45.
53.  Geng B, Yang X, Li P, Shi W, Pan D, Shen L. W-Doped TiO(2) Nanorods for Multimode Tumor Eradication in Osteosarcoma Models  under Single Ultrasound Irradiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2021; 13(38): 45325–34.
54.  Aksel M, Kesmez Ö, Yavaş A, Bilgin MD. Titaniumdioxide mediated sonophotodynamic therapy against prostate cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2021; 225: 112333.
55.  Liang S, Xiao X, Bai L, Liu B, Yuan M, Ma P, et al. Conferring Ti-Based MOFs with Defects for Enhanced Sonodynamic Cancer Therapy. Adv Mater 2021; 33(18): e2100333.
56.  Shanei A, Shanei MM. Effect of gold nanoparticle size on acoustic cavitation using chemical dosimetry method. Ultrason Sonochem 2017; 34: 45–50.
57.  Mano SS, Kanehira K, Sonezaki S, Taniguchi A. Effect of polyethylene glycol modification of TiO2 nanoparticles on cytotoxicity and gene expressions in human cell lines. Int J Mol Sci 2012; 13(3): 3703–17.
58.  Harris JC, Scully MA, Day ES. Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for cancer management. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11(12): 1836.
59.  Zhen X, Cheng P, Pu K. Recent Advances in Cell Membrane–Camouflaged Nanoparticles for Cancer Phototherapy. Small 2019; 15(1): e1804105.
 
Volume 44, Issue 852
4th Week, April
March and April 2026
Pages 241-252

  • Receive Date 18 January 2025
  • Accept Date 21 February 2026