Journal of Isfahan Medical School

Journal of Isfahan Medical School

A Review of Microfluidic Technologies in Fertility Preservation with a Focus on Ovarian Tissue: Clinical Evidence and Research Perspectives

Document Type : Review Article

Authors
Hamid Bahramian 1
Mehdi Sattari-Najafabadi 2
Hossein Salehi 1
Sayed Mehrdad Azimi 1
Vajihe Asgari 1
1 Department of Anatomical and Molecular Biology Sciences, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
10.48305/jims.v44.i866.1009
Abstract
Background: Microfluidic technologies have emerged as transformative tools in reproductive medicine. By enabling precise control of fluid dynamics at the microscale, they make it possible to recreate physiological conditions for gamete handling, embryo culture, and ovarian tissue modeling.
Methods: This review draws on highly cited literature published between 2015 and 2025 to map the current landscape of microfluidic platforms. It examines droplet-based, continuous-flow, 3D-printed, and porous-media systems, with particular attention to material selection, device architecture, and functional integration with a deep focus on ovarian tissue in assisted reproductive Techniques.
Findings: In assisted reproductive Techniques, microfluidic sperm sorting has been shown to select motile spermatozoa with intact DNA and to improve embryo morphology. However, consistent gains in fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, and live birth remain unproven in unselected populations. Lab-on-a-chip systems that combine oocyte denudation, fertilization, and embryo culture have proven feasible in animal models but lack robust human data. In ovarian biology, follicle-on-a-chip platforms support the growth of human follicles under perfusion, and chips such as EVATAR have reproduced the hormonal profiles of a 28-day cycle. Core-shell encapsulation has advanced in vitro folliculogenesis in mice through to the metaphase II oocyte stage, pointing toward transplantation-independent fertility-preservation strategies.
Conclusion: Key barriers to clinical investigations include manufacturing scalability, regulatory standardization, limited human endpoints, and the challenges of vascularization and long-term culture. Future priorities are multicenter randomized trials with live birth as the primary endpoint, standardized reporting frameworks, and early engagement with regulatory bodies.

Highlights

Hamid Bahramian: Google Scholar , PubMed

Mehdi Sattari-Najafabadi: Google Scholar , PubMed

Hossein Salehi: Google Scholar , PubMed

Sayed Mehrdad Azimi: Google Scholar , PubMed

Vajihe Asgar: Google Scholar , PubMed

Keywords
Microfluidics
Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Ovary
Lab-on-a-chip
Devices
Subjects
1.     Karl MO, Kroeger W, Wimmers S, Milenkovic VM, Valtink M, Engelmann K, et al. Endogenous Gas6 and Ca2+-channel activation modulate phagocytosis by retinal pigment epithelium. Cell Signal [Internet]. 2008;20(6):1159–68. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-42249087140&doi=10.1016%2Fj.cellsig.2008.02.005&partnerID=40&md5=9e8d1eb48fd711347b8c4b52d202143a
2.     Li X, Wang M, Davis TP, Zhang L, Qiao R. Advancing Tissue Culture With Light-Driven 3d-Printed Microfluidic Devices. Biosensors 2024; 14(6): 301.
3.     Jiaqi L, Cui L, Shi X, Wu S. Emerging Trends in Microfluidic Biomaterials: From Functional Design to Applications. J Funct Biomater 2025; 16(5): 166.
4.     Song K, Li G, Zu X, Du Z, Liu L, Hu Z. The fabrication and application mechanism of microfluidic systems for high throughput biomedical screening: a review. Micromachines (Basel) 2020; 11(3): 297.
5.     Li Y, Sun K, Shao Y, Wang C, Xue F, Chu C, et al. Next‐generation approaches for biomedical materials evaluation: microfluidics and organ‐on‐a‐chip technologies. Adv Healthc Mater 2024; 14(1): 2402611.
6.     Chen L, Guo X, Sun X, Zhang S, Wu J, Yu H, et al. Porous Structural Microfluidic Device for Biomedical Diagnosis: A Review. Micromachines (Basel) 2023; 14(3): 547.
7.     An L, Liu Y, Liu Y. Organ-on-a-Chip Applications in Microfluidic Platforms. Micromachines (Basel) 2025; 16(2): 201.
8.     Chen H, Zhang X, Wang H, Xing S, Yin R, Fu W, et al. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Can Inhibit the Allocation of Microplastics From Crop Roots to Aboveground Edible Parts. J Agric Food Chem 2023; 71(47): 18323–32.
9.     Hosseini SM, Asgari V, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M, Ghanaei HR, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Developmental competence of ovine oocytes after vitrification: Differential effects of vitrification steps, embryo production methods, and parental origin of pronuclei. Theriogenology 2015; 83(3): 366–76.
10.  Hosseini SM, Asgari V, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M, Piryaei A, Najarasl M, et al. Potential applications of sheep oocytes as affected by vitrification and in vitro aging. Theriogenology 2012; 77(9): 1741–53.
11.  Alias AB, Huang HY, Yao D. A Review on Microfluidics: An Aid to Assisted Reproductive Technology. Molecules. 2021;26(14):4354.
12.  Weng L. IVF-on-a-Chip: Recent Advances in Microfluidics Technology for in Vitro Fertilization. Slas Technol. 2019;24(4):373–85.
13.  Casciani V, Galliano D, Franasiak JM, Mariani G, Meseguer M. Are we approaching automated assisted reproductive technology? embryo culture, metabolomics, and cryopreservation. F&s Rev 2021; 2(4): 251–64.
14.  Huang HY, Kao W, Wang Y, Yao D. Using a Dielectrophoretic Microfluidic Biochip Enhanced Fertilization of Mouse Embryo in Vitro. Micromachines 2020; 11(8): 714.
15.  Bashiri Z, Afzali A, Koruji M, Torkashvand H, Ghorbanlou M, Sheibak N, et al. Advanced Strategies for Single Embryo Selection in Assisted Human Reproduction: A Review of Clinical Practice and Research Methods. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2025; 52(1): 8–29.
16.  Bakhtari A, Rahmani HR, Bonakdar E, Jafarpour F, Asgari V, Hosseini SM, et al. The interfering effects of superovulation and vitrification upon some important epigenetic biomarkers in mouse blastocyst. Cryobiology 2014; 69(3): 419–27.
17.  Skory RM, Xu Y, Shea LD, Woodruff TK. Engineering the ovarian cycle using in vitro follicle culture. Hum Reprod 2015; 30(6): 1386–95.
18.  Aziz A u. R, Fu M, Deng J, Geng C, Luo Y, Lin B, et al. A microfluidic device for culturing an encapsulated ovarian follicle. Micromachines 2017; 8(11): 335.
19.  Thuwanut P, Pimpin A, Thatsanabunjong F, Srisuwatanasagul S, Sereepapong W, Sirayapiwat P. A modified hydrostatic microfluidic pumpless device for in vitro murine ovarian tissue culture as research model for fertility preservation. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2022; 65(4): 376–81.
20.  Xiao S, Coppeta JR, Rogers HB, Isenberg BC, Zhu J, Olalekan SA, et al. A microfluidic culture model of the human reproductive tract and 28-day menstrual cycle. Nat Commun 2017;8(1): 14584.
21.  Healy MW, Dolitsky SN, Villancio-Wolter M, Raghavan M, Tillman AR, Morgan NY, et al. Creating an artificial 3-dimensional ovarian follicle culture system using a microfluidic system. Micromachines (Basel) 2021; 12(3): 261.
22.  Choi JH, Loarca L, De Hoyos-Vega JM, Dadgar N, Loutherback K, Shah VH, et al. Microfluidic confinement enhances phenotype and function of hepatocyte spheroids. Am J Physiol Physiol 2020; 319(3): C552–60.
23.  Ferreira FTSM, Catalão KA, Mesquita RBR, Rangel AOSS. New microfluidic paper-based analytical device for iron determination in urine samples. Anal Bioanal Chem 2021; 413(30): 7463–72.
24.  Mastrorocco A, Cacopardo L, Temerario L, Martino NA, Tridente F, Rizzo A, et al. Investigating and Modelling an Engineered Millifluidic In Vitro Oocyte Maturation System Reproducing the Physiological Ovary Environment in the Sheep Model. Cells 2022; 11(22): 3611.
25.  Del Valle JS, Mancini V, Laverde Garay M, Asseler JD, Fan X, Metzemaekers J, et al. Dynamic in vitro culture of cryopreserved-thawed human ovarian cortical tissue using a microfluidics platform does not improve early folliculogenesis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13: 936765.  
26.  Laronda MM, Rutz AL, Xiao S, Whelan KA, Duncan FE, Roth EW, et al. A bioprosthetic ovary created using 3D printed microporous scaffolds restores ovarian function in sterilized mice. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 15261.
27.  Hosseini SM, Asgari V, Hajian M, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Cytoplasmic, rather than nuclear-DNA, insufficiencies as the major cause of poor competence of vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 30(5): 549–52.
28.  Zhou Y. Advanced Strategies in Organoid/Organ-on-a-Chip for Female Reproductive Diseases. Biofabrication 2025; 18(1): 12004.
29.  Malo C, Oliván S, Ochoa I, Shikanov A. In Vitro Growth of Human Follicles: Current and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25(3): 1510.
30.  Lopez E, Kamboj S, Chen C, Wang Z, Kellouche S, Leroy‐Dudal J, et al. In Vitro Models of Ovarian Cancer: Bridging the Gap Between Pathophysiology and Mechanistic Models. Biomolecules 2023; 13(1): 103.
31.  Nair R, Kasturi M, Mathur V, Seetharam RN, Vasanthan KS. Strategies for Developing 3D Printed Ovarian Model for Restoring Fertility. Clin Transl Sci 2024; 17(7): e13863.
32.  Deng Y, Liu X, Jian X, Zhang Y, Hou Y, Hou S, et al. A Novel Clinical-Grade Cryopreservation Solution for Adipose Tissue Based on Metformin. Stem Cell Res Ther 2025; 16(1): 20.
33.  Mancini V, Pensabene V. Organs-on-Chip Models of the Female Reproductive System. Bioengineering (Basel) 2019; 6(4): 103.
34.  Dadashzadeh A, Moghassemi S, Shavandi A, Amorim CA. A review on biomaterials for ovarian tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2021; 135: 48–63.
35.  Zhang H. Organoids and Organ‐on‐a‐chip Models for Investigating the Pathophysiology of the Human Reproductive System. Interdiscip Med 2026; 4(2): e70094.
36.  Aziz AUR, Fu M, Deng J, Geng C, Luo Y, Lin B, et al. A microfluidic device for culturing an encapsulated ovarian follicle. Micromachines. 2017 Nov;8(11):335.
37.  Wu T, Yan J, Nie K, Chen Y, Wu Y, Wang S, et al. Microfluidic Chips in Female Reproduction: A Systematic Review of Status, Advances, and Challenges. Theranostics 2024; 14(11): 4352–74.
38.  Zhao G, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Niu D, Cao Y, et al. A microfluidic perfusion approach for on-chip characterization of the transport properties of human oocytes. Lab Chip 2017; 17(7): 1297–305.
39.  Asgari V, Hosseini SM, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M, Azhdari ZT, Mosaie M, et al. Specific activation requirements of in vitro-matured sheep oocytes following vitrification-warming. Mol Reprod Dev 2012; 79(7): 434–44.
40.  Thuwanut P, Comizzoli P, Pimpin A, Srituravanich W, Sereepapong W, Pruksananonda K, et al. Influence of hydrogel encapsulation during cryopreservation of ovarian tissues and impact of post-thawing in vitro culture systems in a research animal model. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2021; 48(2): 111–23.
41.  Guo Y, Yang Y, Yi X, Zhou X. Microfluidic method reduces osmotic stress injury to oocytes during cryoprotectant addition and removal processes in porcine oocytes. Cryobiology 2019; 90: 63–70.
42.  Miao S, Guo C, Jiang Z, Wei HX, Jiang X, Gu J, et al. Development of an Open Microfluidic Platform for Oocyte One-Stop Vitrification with Cryotop Method. Biosensors (Basel) 2022; 12(9): 766.
43.  Shen J, Ye N, Zhang Y, Liu C, Li W, Zhou X. Optimization of mouse oocyte vitrification through microencapsulation in sodium alginate hydrogel. J Assist Reprod Genet 2025; 42(10): 3493-504.
44.  Stewart S, White A, Ou W, Liu W, Nagashima J, Songsasen N, et al. Controlled Ice Nucleation with a Sand-PDMS Film Device Enhances Cryopreservation of Mouse Preantral Ovarian Follicles. J Med Devic 2024; 18(4): 041007.
45.  Tian C, Shen L, Gong C, Cao Y, Shi Q, Zhao G. Microencapsulation and nanowarming enables vitrification cryopreservation of mouse preantral follicles. Nat Commun 2022; 13: 7515.
46.  Miao S, Xu J, Jiang Z, Luo J, Sun X, Jiang X, et al. Microfluidics-enabled robotic system for embryo vitrification with real-time observation: design, method, and evaluation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 2023; 29(1): 179–89.
47.  Asgari V, Hosseini SM, Forouzanfar M, Hajian M, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Vitrification of in vitro produced bovine embryos: Effect of embryonic block and developmental kinetics. Cryobiology 2012; 65(3): 278–83.
48.  Zhan L, Hinnen H, Gopinathan KA, Toner M. Autonomous cryoprotectant loading of the oocyte using microfluidic transistors. Device. 2025;3(6):100715.
Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Volume 44, Issue 866
2nd Week, August
July and August 2026
Pages 1009-1024

  • Receive Date 07 June 2026
  • Accept Date 13 July 2026