1. Klein Meuleman SJM, Murji A, van den Bosch T, Donnez O, Grimbizis G, Saridogan E, et al. Definition and Criteria for Diagnosing Cesarean Scar Disorder. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6(3): e235321.
2. Naji O, Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, Smith A, Pexsters A, Stalder C, et al. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39(3): 252-9.
3. Verberkt C, Jordans IPM, Van den Bosch T, Timmerman D, Bourne T, de Leeuw RA, et al. How to perform standardized sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60(3): 420-4.
4. Vigashini A, Pallavee P. Prevalence and risk factors of sonographically detected cesarean scar defects: a review. SBV Journal of Basic, Clinical and Applied Health Science 2024; 7(3): 123-7.
5. Antila RM, Mäenpää JU, Huhtala HS, Tomás EI, Staff SM. Association of cesarean scar defect with abnormal uterine bleeding: The results of a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 244: 134-40.
6. Armstrong F, Mulligan K, Dermott RM, Bartels HC, Carroll S, Robson M, et al. Cesarean scar niche: An evolving concern in clinical practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 161(2): 356-66.
7. Murji A, Sanders AP, Monteiro I, Haiderbhai S, Matelski J, Walsh C, et al. Cesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2022; 118(4): 758-66.
8. Xu XJ, Jia JX, Sang ZQ, Li L. Association of caesarean scar defect with risk of abnormal uterine bleeding: results from meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24(1): 432.
9. Tsuji S, Nobuta Y, Hanada T, Takebayashi A, Inatomi A, Takahashi A, et al. Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review. Reprod Med Biol 2023; 22(1): e12532.
10. Bij de Vaate AJ, Brölmann HA, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne JA. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37(1): 93-9.
11. van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG 2014; 121(2): 236-44.
12. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34(1): 85-9.
13. Wang J, Pang Q, Wei W, Cheng L, Huang F, Cao Y, et al. Definition of large niche after Cesarean section based on prediction of postmenstrual spotting: Chinese cohort study in non-pregnant women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 59(4): 450-6.
14. Yao M, Wang W, Zhou J, Sun M, Zhu J, Chen P, et al. Cesarean section scar diverticulum evaluation by saline contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: The relationship between variable parameters and longer menstrual bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017; 43(4): 696-704.
15. Bandry KW, Abou-Taleb H, Seifeldein GS, Taha MG, Qenawy OK. Prediction of the relationship of cesarean section scar niche and postmenstrual spotting: is there any relation? Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2022; 53(1): 24.
Allameh Z, Rouholamin S, Rasti S, Adibi A, Foroughi Z, Goharian M, et al. A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23(1): 558