مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان

مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان

تأثیر دو نوع فرود رایج بر فعالیت الکتریکی عضلات اندام تحتانی در ورزشکاران دارای کشیدگی همسترینگ

نوع مقاله : Original Article(s)

نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه آموزش تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی، گروه بیومکانیک ورزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
3 دانشجوی کارشناسی کینزیولوژی، دانشگاه یورک، تورنتو، کانادا
10.48305/jims.v43.i844.1801
چکیده
مقدمه: کشیدگی عضلات همسترینگ، یکی از شایع‌ترین آسیب‌های اندام تحتانی در ورزشکاران است که با اختلالات پایدار عصبی-‌عضلانی همراه است و می‌تواند بر پایداری زانو و خطر آسیب‌های مکرر تأثیر بگذارد. این مطالعه به بررسی تأثیر دو الگوی فرود با تنه اکستند شده و فلکس‌ شده بر فرکانس میانه الکترومایوگرافی عضلات اندام تحتانی در ورزشکاران والیبالیست با سابقه‌ی کشیدگی همسترینگ در مقایسه با همتایان سالم پرداخت.
روش‌ها: پژوهش حاضر از نوع مقطعی مقایسه‌ای بود. تعداد 16 والیبالیست مرد سالم و 16 والیبالیست مرد با کشیدگی همسترینگ به صورت هدفمند به دو گروه شاهد و مورد تقسیم شدند. فعالیت الکتریکی عضلات منتخب با دستگاه الکترومایوگرافی حین فرود از جعبه 30 سانتی‌متری ثبت شد. جهت تحلیل‌های آماری از آنالیز واریانس با اندازه‌های تکراری در سطح معنی‌داری 0/05 استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: در فرکانس میانه عضلات رکتوس فموریس (0/022 = P) و بایسپس فموریس (0/035 = P) در اثر عامل گروه، فرکانس میانه عضلات بایسپس فموریس (0/016 = P) و وستوس مدیالیس (0/017 = P) در اثر عامل تکلیف و اثر تعاملی تکلیف*گروه در این دو عضله (0/044 = P) و (0/029 = P) اختلاف معنی‌داری مشاهد شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: ورزشکاران با کشیدگی همسترینگ، الگوهای متفاوتی در فعال‌سازی عصبی‌عضلانی نشان می‌دهند که وابسته به وضعیت تنه است و فرود با تنه فلکس‌شده می‌تواند بار مکانیکی را بهتر توزیع کند. در بازتوانی، تمرکز بر تمرینات فرود با تنه فلکس‌شده و هماهنگی کوادریسپس- همسترینگ می‌تواند خطر عود آسیب را کاهش دهد و بازگشت ایمن به ورزش را تسهیل کند.
 

تازه های تحقیق

شیرین عالی:  PubMed ,Google Scholar

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Two Common Landing Types on Lower Limb Muscle Electrical Activity in Athletes with Hamstring Strain

نویسندگان English

Shirin Aali 1
Mahshid Yousefi 2
Parsa Forghani 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Sport Science Education, Farhangian University, P.O., Tehran, Iran
2 PhD Student, Department of Sports Biomechanics, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran
3 Kinesiology student, York University, Toronto, Canada
چکیده English

Background: Hamstring strain is one of the most common lower-limb injuries in athletes and is often accompanied by persistent neuromuscular impairments that may affect knee stability and increase the risk of re-injury. This study examined the effects of two landing patterns (trunk-extended vs. trunk-flexed) on the EMG median frequency of lower-limb muscles in male volleyball players with a history of hamstring strain compared with healthy peers.
Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study included 16 healthy male volleyball players and 16 male volleyball players with hamstring strain, recruited purposively and assigned to control and case groups. Surface EMG of selected muscles was recorded during a drop-landing task from a 30-cm box. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05.
Findings: A significant main effect of group was found for the median frequency of the rectus femoris (p=0.022) and biceps femoris (p=0.035). For the biceps femoris, both the main effect of task (p=0.016) and the group*task interaction (p=0.044) were significant. For the vastus medialis, the main effect of task (p=0.017) and the group*task interaction (p=0.029) were also significant.
Conclusion: Athletes with hamstring strain exhibit trunk-dependent differences in neuromuscular activation, and trunk-flexed landing may facilitate a more favorable distribution of mechanical load. Rehabilitation emphasizing trunk-flexed landing drills and quadriceps–hamstring coordination may reduce recurrence risk and support a safer return to sport.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hamstring Muscles
Landing
Frequency spectrum
Electrical activity
1.     Jankaew A, Wang PC, Jan YK, Hwang IS, Lin CF. Hamstring activation deficits during Double-Leg Jump-Landing tasks in athletes with hamstring strain injuries using EMG Time-Frequency analysis. J Biomech 2025; 179: 112475.
2.     Kepir E, Demiral F, Akaras E, Paksoy AE, Sevindik Aktas B, Yilmaz Cankaya B, et al. Hamstring Muscle Stiffness in Athletes with and without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction History: A Retrospective Study. Hamstring Muscle Stiffness in Athletes with and without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction History: A Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13(15): 4370.
3.     Maniar N, Shield AJ, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Opar DA. Hamstring strength and flexibility after hamstring strain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50(15): 909-20.
4.     Presland JD, Timmins RG, Maniar N, Tofari PJ, Kidgell DJ, Shield AJ, et al. Muscle Activity and Activation in Previously Strain-Injured Lower Limbs: A Systematic Review. Sports Med 2021; 51(11): 2311-27.
5.     Buhmann R, Trajano GS, Kerr G, Shield A. Voluntary Activation and Reflex Responses after Hamstring Strain Injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52(9): 1862-9.
6.     Buhmann R, Trajano GS, Kerr GK, Shield AJ. Increased short interval intracortical inhibition in participants with previous hamstring strain injury. Eur J Appl Physiol 2022; 122(2): 357-69.
7.     Fyfe JJ, Opar DA, Williams MD, Shield AJ. The role of neuromuscular inhibition in hamstring strain injury recurrence. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2013; 23(3): 523-30.
8.     Serpell BG, Scarvell JM, Ball NB, Smith PN. Mechanisms and risk factors for noncontact ACL injury in age mature athletes who engage in field or court sports: a summary of the literature since 1980. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26(11): 3160-76.
9.     Huijing PA. Muscular force transmission necessitates a multilevel integrative approach to the analysis of function of skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2003; 31(4): 167-75.
10.  Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Tol JL, Almusa E, Moen MH, Weir A, et al. MRI observations at return to play of clinically recovered hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48(18): 1370-6.
11.  Fouladi R, Rajabi R, Minoonejad H, Eslami M. Hamstring injury as a preview of athletic biomechanical knee injuries: A review article [in Persian]. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017; 6(3): 274-85.
12.  Opar DA, Serpell BG. Is there a potential relationship between prior hamstring strain injury and increased risk for future anterior cruciate ligament injury? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95(2): 401-5.
13.  Green B, Bourne MN, van Dyk N, Pizzari T. Recalibrating the risk of hamstring strain injury (HSI): A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for index and recurrent hamstring strain injury in sport. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54(18): 1081-8.
14.  Shimokochi Y, Shultz SJ. Mechanisms of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Athl Train 2008; 43(4): 396-408.
15.  Jankaew A, Jan YK, Hwang IS, Kuo LC, Lin CF. Hamstring activation deficits in different jumping directions in athletes with a history of hamstring strain injuries: a cross-sectional laboratory study. Sport Biomch 2025; 24(5): 1293-308.
16.  Padulo J, Tiloca A, Powell D, Granatelli G, Bianco A, Paoli A. EMG amplitude of the biceps femoris during jumping compared to landing movements. SpringerPlus 2013; 2: 520.
17.  von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008; 61(4): 344-9.
18.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants. JAMA 2025; 333(1): 71-4.
19.  Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007; 39(2): 175-91.
20.  Azadi F, Amjad RN, Marioryad H, Alimohammadi M, Karimpour Vazifehkhorani A, Poursadeghiyan M. Effect of 12-Week Neck, Core, and Combined Stabilization Exercises on the Pain and Disability of Elderly Patients With Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain: A Clinical Trial [in Persian]. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2019; 13(5): 614-25.
21.  Hickey JT, Timmins RG, Maniar N, Rio E, Hickey PF, Pitcher CA, et al. Pain-Free Versus Pain-Threshold Rehabilitation Following Acute Hamstring Strain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020; 50(2): 91-103.
22.  Seyedi M, Zarei M, Daneshjoo A, Rajabi R, Shirzad E, Mozafaripour E, et al. Effects of FIFA 11 + warm-up program on kinematics and proprioception in adolescent soccer players: a parallel‑group randomized control trial. Sci Rep 2023; 13(1): 5527.
23.  Nishizawa K, Hashimoto T, Hakukawa S, Nagura T, Otani T, Harato K. Effects of foot progression angle on kinematics and kinetics of a cutting movement. J Exp Orthop 2022; 9(1): 11.
24.  Neumann DA, Kelly ER. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: foundations for rehabilitation. St Louis, Mosby; 2010.
25.  Sinsurin K, Vachalathiti R, Srisangboriboon S, Richards J. Knee joint coordination during single-leg landing in different directions. Sports Biomech 2020; 19(5): 652-64.
26.  Mafi M, Sheikhalizade H, Jafarnezhadgero A, Asheghan M. Investigating the effect of sand training on running mechanics in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and pronated feet. Gait Posture 2023; 104: 129-34.
27.  Hermens H, Freriks B, Merletti R, Hägg G, Stegeman DF, Blok JH, et al. SENIAM 8: European recommendations for surface electromyography1999.
28.  Farahpour N, Jafarnezhadgero A, Allard P, Majlesi M. Muscle activity and kinetics of lower limbs during walking in pronated feet individuals with and without low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2018; 39: 35-41.
29.  Pieh C, Humer E, Hoenigl A, Schwab J, Mayerhofer D, Dale R, et al. Smartphone screen time reduction improves mental health: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med 2025; 23(1): 107.
30.  Cifrek M, Medved V, Tonković S, Ostojić S. Surface EMG based muscle fatigue evaluation in biomechanics. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009; 24(4): 327-40.
31.  Yassierli, Nussbaum MA. Utility of traditional and alternative EMG-based measures of fatigue during low-moderate level isometric efforts. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008; 18(1): 44-53.
32.  Blackburn JT, Padua DA. Sagittal-plane trunk position, landing forces, and quadriceps electromyographic activity. J Athl Train 2009; 44(2): 174-9.
33.  Pollard CD, Sigward SM, Powers CM. Limited hip and knee flexion during landing is associated with increased frontal plane knee motion and moments. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010; 25(2): 142-6.
34.  Teng HL, Powers CM. Hip-Extensor Strength, Trunk Posture, and Use of the Knee-Extensor Muscles During Running. J Athl Train 2016; 51(7): 519-24.
35.  Opar DA, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Dear NM, Shield AJ. Knee flexor strength and bicep femoris electromyographical activity is lower in previously strained hamstrings. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2013; 23(3): 696-703.
36.  Timmins RG, Bourne MN, Shield AJ, Williams MD, Lorenzen C, Opar DA. Short biceps femoris fascicles and eccentric knee flexor weakness increase the risk of hamstring injury in elite football (soccer): a prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50(24): 1524-35.
37.  Hodges PW, Tucker K. Moving differently in pain: a new theory to explain the adaptation to pain. Pain 2011; 152(3 Suppl): S90-s8.
38.  Powers CM. The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: a biomechanical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40(2): 42-51.
39.  Malfait B, Dingenen B, Smeets A, Staes F, Pataky T, Robinson MA, et al. Knee and Hip Joint Kinematics Predict Quadriceps and Hamstrings Neuromuscular Activation Patterns in Drop Jump Landings. PLoS One 2016; 11(4): e0153737.
40.  Pieters D, Wezenbeek E, Schuermans J, Witvrouw E. Return to Play After a Hamstring Strain Injury: It is Time to Consider Natural Healing. Sports Med 2021; 51(10): 2067-77.
دوره 43، شماره 844
هفته 4، بهمن
بهمن و اسفند 1404
صفحه 1801-1809

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 18 بهمن 1404