مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان

مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان

رابطه‌ی بین عملکرد جنسی و خودکارآمدی جنسی با سازگاری زناشویی در زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان و سرطان‌های ژنیکولوژیک

نوع مقاله : Original Article(s)

نویسندگان
1 استاد مامایی، دانشکده‌ی علوم پزشکی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اراک، اراک، ایران
2 مربی روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده‌ی علوم پزشکی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اراک ، اراک، ایران
10.48305/jims.v44.i858.0534
چکیده
مقدمه: این مطالعه با هدف ارزیابی رابطه‌ی بین عملکرد جنسی و خودکارآمدی جنسی با سازگاری زناشویی در زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان و سرطان‌های ژنیکولوژیک انجام شد.
روش‌ها: این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی- همبستگی از نوع مقطعی است که با روش همبستگی روی تمام زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان و سرطان‌های ژنیکولوژیک (306 نفر) مراجعه‌کننده به مرکز بیمارستان شهید رحیمی و مرکز انجمن نور شهر خرم‌آباد، ایران انجام شد. حجم نمونه بر اساس جدول کرجسی و مورگان تعیین شد و نمونه‌گیری به روش در دسترس انجام گردید و در مجموع 180 نفر بر اساس معیارهای ورود و خروج انتخاب شدند. نمونه‌ها با استفاده از مصاحبه و پرسشنامه‌ی اطلاعات فردی- اجتماعی، پرسشنامه‌ی شاخص عملکرد جنسی زنان، پرسشنامه‌ی خودکارآمدی جنسی وازیری و لطفی و پرسشنامه‌ی سازگاری زوجی اسپانیر مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. در نهایت، داده‌ها برای ارائه‌ی میانگین و انحراف معیار و تحلیل آماری از طریق همبستگی Pearson و رگرسیون سلسله‌مراتبی ساده استفاده شدند.
یافته‌ها: مدل رگرسیون استاندارد نشان داد که بین عملکرد جنسی و خودکارآمدی جنسی با سازگاری زناشویی زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان و سرطان‌های ژنیکولوژیک، رابطه‌ی معناداری وجود دارد. متغیرهای مستقل «عملکرد جنسی و خودکارآمدی جنسی» در ضرایب رگرسیون، مهم‌ترین پیش‌بینی‌کننده‌ها برای متغیر وابسته «سازگاری زناشویی» هستند.
نتیجه‌گیری: بیماری‌های مزمن، از جمله سرطان در زنان، علاوه بر اثرگذاری بر خود بیمار، می‌توانند بر زندگی زناشویی بیمار نیز اثر بگذارند.

تازه های تحقیق

معصومه هاشمی: Google Scholar , PubMed

کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Relationship Between Sexual Performance and Sexual Self-Efficacy with Marital Adjustment in Women with Breast and Gynecological Cancer

نویسندگان English

Masoumeh Hashemi 1
Samira Alagholipour 2
1 Professor of Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Arak Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
2 Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University of Arak, Arak, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between sexual performance and sexual self-efficacy with marital adjustment in women with breast and gynecological cancer.
Method: This applied, and descriptive study was conducted using a correlational method on all women with breast and gynecological cancer (306 people) referring to Shahid Rahimi Hospital Center and Anjuman Noor Shahr Khorramabad Center, Iran. A total of 180 people were selected using Morgan's sampling method based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The samples were assessed using interviews and a personal-social information questionnaire, women's sexual performance index questionnaire, Vaziri and Lotfi's sexual self-efficacy questionnaire, and Spiner's couple compatibility questionnaire. Finally, data were used to present the mean and standard deviation and statistical analysis via Pearson correlation and simple hierarchical regression.
Findings: The standard regression model showed that there was a significant relationship between sexual performance and sexual self-efficacy with marital adjustment of women with breast and gynecological cancer. The independent variables "sexual performance and sexual self-efficacy" in the regression coefficients are the most important predictors for the dependent variable "marital adjustment."
Conclusion: Chronic diseases, including women's cancer, in addition to affecting the patient themselves, can also affect the patient's married life.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sexual Function
Self-Efficacy
Marital Adjustment
Breast Neoplasms
Gynecologic Neoplasms
1.     Aliakbari Dehkordi M. Relationship between women sexual function and marital adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences 2010; 4(3): 199-206.
2.     Tadris Tabrizi M, Sharifian M, K, Aliakbari M. Structural model of women’s sexual health: The role of self-differentiation and social exchange styles [in Persian]. Iran J Health Psychol 2022; 5(3): 17-34.
3.     McCool-Myers M, Theurich M, Zuelke A, Knuettel H, Apfelbacher C. Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms. BMC Womens Health 2018; 18: 108.
4.     McCabe M, Althof SE, Assalian P, Chevret-Measson M, Leiblum SR, Simonelli C, et al. Psychological and Interpersonal Dimensions of Sexual Function and Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2020; 7(1 Pt 2): 327-36.
5.     Basek A, Jakubiak GK, Cieślar G, Stanek A. Life-threatening endocrinological immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15(24): 5786.
6.     Wilkinson L, Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. Br J Radiol 2022; 95(1130): 20211033.
7.     Nalbant B, Karger A, Zimmermann T. Cancer and Relationship Dissolution: Perspective of Partners of Cancer Patients. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 624902.
8.     Dizon DS, Suzin D, McIlvenna S. Sexual health as a survivorship issue for female cancer survivors. Oncologist 2014; 19(2): 202-10.
9.     Nho JH, Park YS. Descriptive Study on Sexuality for Women with Gynecological Cancer. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2012; 18(1): 17-27.
10.  Vanessa Ospina Serrano A. Overview of sexual dysfunction in patients with cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25(12): 3369-77.
11.  Ratner ES, Foran KA, Schwartz PE, Minkin MJ. Sexuality and intimacy after gynecological cancer. Maturitas 2010; 66(1): 23-6.
12.  Teimourpour N. Sexual health and sexual dysfunction in women with cancer [in Persian]. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal 2023; 4(10): 81-108..
13.  Del Pup L, Villa P, Amar ID, Bottoni C, Scambia G. Approach to sexual dysfunction in women with cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29(3): 630-4.
14.  Bakker RM, Kenter GG, Creutzberg CL, Stiggelbout AM, Derks M, Mingelen W, et al. Sexual distress and associated factors among cervical cancer survivors: a cross-sectional multicenter observational study. Psychooncology 2016; 26(10): 1470-7.
15.  Jahromi AR, Ranjbar A, Naseripour P, Rahmanian V. Body image and sexual function in women with breast cancer. Sexual and Relationship Therapy 2022; 39(2): 1-11.
16.  Reese JB, Keefe FJ, Somers TJ, Abernethy AP. Coping with sexual concerns after cancer: the use of flexible coping. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18(7): 785-800.
17.  Rosen R , Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26(2): 191-208.
18.  Brotto L, Atallah S, Johnson-Agbakwu C, Rosenbaum T, Abdo C, Byers ES, Graham C, Nobre P, Wylie K. Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. J Sex Med 2016; 13(4): 538-71.
19.  Fakhri A, Mohammadi Zeidi I, Pakpour Haji Agha A, Morshedi H, Jafari RM, Ghalambor Dezfooli F. Psychometric Properties of Iranian Version of Female Sexual Function Index. J Sex Med 2011; 10: 345-54.
20.  Vaziri S, Kashani FL. Study of factor structure, reliability and validity of the sexual self efficacy questionnaire [in Persian]. Thought and Behavior in Clinical Psychology 2013; 8(29): 47-56.
21.  Villeneuve L, Trudel G, Préville M, Dargis L, Boyer R, Bégin J. Dyadic Adjustment Scale: a validation study among older French-Canadians living in relationships. Can J Aging 2015. 34(1): 26-35.
22.  Fallahchai R. Occupational stress, dyadic adjustment and quality of work-life in married nurses: Moderating effects of dyadic coping. Int J Nurs Pract 2022; 28(1): e13032.
23.  Maroufizadeh S, Omani-Samani R, Hosseini M, Almasi-Hashiani A, Sepidarkish M, Amini P. The Persian version of the revised dyadic adjustment scale (RDAS): a validation study in infertile patients. BMC Psychol 2020; 8(1): 6.
24.  Sanchez-Fuentes MDM, Santos-IglesiasP , Sierra JC. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 2014; 14(1): 67-75.
25.  Velten J, Margraf J. Satisfaction guaranteed? How individual, partner, and relationship factors impact sexual satisfaction within partnerships. PLoS One 2017;12(2): e0172855.
26.  Reese JB, Porter LS, Casale KE, Bantug ET, Bober SL, Schwartz SC, et al. Adapting a couple-based sexual enhancement intervention for breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014; 32(6): 705-27.
27.  Sobhani R, Zebardast A, Rezaei S. Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies, Body Image, and Sexual Satisfaction in Women with and without a History of Hysterectomy and Mastectomy Surgeries [in Persian]. Scientific Journal of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty 2020; 6(1): 72-87.
28.  Kedde H, van de Wiel HBM, Weijmar Schultz WCM, Wijsen C. Sexual dysfunction in young women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21(1): 271-80.
29.  Santos M, Montagut C, Mellado B, García A, Ramón y Cajal S, Cardesa A, et al. Immunohistochemical staining for p16 and p53 in premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions of the vulva. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23(3): 206-14.
30.  Lim, JW, Shon, EJ, Paek, M. The dyadic effects of coping and resilience on psychological distress for cancer survivor couples. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22: 3209–17.
31.  Mehdipour-Rabori R, Alinejad Dehsheakhi M, Nouhi E, Nematollahi M. Comparison of the relationship between sexual function, marital adjustment, and life satisfaction in diabetic and non-diabetic women. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2020; 8(4): 324-32.
32.  Goyal H, Narayan S. Exploring the role of emotional intelligence in marital adjustment: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Indian Psychology 2 Tahir K, Khan N. Mediating role of body image between sexual functioning and marital intimacy in Pakistani women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2021; 30(2): 260-6.
33.  Assarzadeh R, Bostani Khalesi Z, Jafarzadeh-Kenarsari F. Sexual self-efficacy and associated factors: a review. Shiraz E-Med J 2019; 20(11): e87537.
34.  Kafaei Atrian M, Mohebbi Dehnavi Z, Kamali Z. The relationship between sexual self-efficacy and sexual function in married women. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health 2019; 7(2): 1703-11.
35.  Banaha S, Pasha H, Bakhtiari A, Omidvar S, Behmanesh F, Faramarzi M, Esmailzadeh S. Effectiveness of group psychosexual training for marital adjustment and sexual self-efficacy of infertile women: a randomized controlled trial. Iran J Psychiatry 2023; 18(3): 275-84.
36.  Moradzadeh R, Golmohammadi P, Ghaitasi B, Nadrian H, Najafi A. Incidence of Esophageal Cancer in Iran, a Population-Based Study: 2001-2015. J Gastrointest Cancer 2019; 50(3): 507-12.
37.  Hassanzadeh J, Moradzadeh R, Rajaee Fard A, Tahmasebi S, GolmohammadiP. A comparison of case-control and case-only designs to investigate gene-environment interactions using breast cancer data. Iran J Med Sci 2012; 37(2): 112-8.
38.  Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Ghiasvand R, Baghfalaki T, Nadrian H, Holakouie-Naieni K. Impact of Age at Menarche on Breast Cancer: The Assessment of Recall Bias. Arch Iran Med 2019; 22(2): 65-70.
 
دوره 44، شماره 858
هفته 2، خرداد
خرداد و تیر 1405
صفحه 534-542

  • تاریخ دریافت 29 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 17 تیر 1405