تدوین مدل برخی از پیشایندها و پیامدهای سازگاری زناشویی

نوع مقاله : مقاله های پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده‌ی علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده‌ی ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران

3 دکتری مشاوره‌ی خانواده، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده‌ی علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران، اهواز، ایران

4 گروه مشاوره، دانشکده‌ی علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

5 استاد، گروه روان‌شناسی صنعتی و سازمانی، دانشکده‌ی علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: سازگاری زناشویی، نقش اساسی در زندگی زوجین دارد. سازگاری زناشویی، بر سلامتی جسمی و روانی زوجین مؤثر است و توانایی مقابله‌ی آن‌ها را با مشکلات و عوامل استرس‌زا افزایش می‌دهد. بنابراین، هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر، تدوین مدل برخی از پیشایندها و پیامدهای سازگاری زناشویی بود.روش‌ها: پژوهش حاضر به روش توصیفی، از نوع مطالعات همبستگی و مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه‌ی آماری پژوهش شامل تمام کارکنان متأهل دانشگاه اصفهان بود که از این تعداد، 172 نفر به روش تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. شرکت کنندگان، به پرسش‌نامه‌های امید بزرگسالان Snyder، شادی Oxford Argyle و همکاران، سازگاری زوجی Busby و همکاران، سنجش گرایش مذهبی خدایاری‌فرد و همکاران و مقیاس تاب‌آوری Davidson و Connor پاسخ دادند. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها به روش الگویابی معادلات ساختاری و با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و AMOS انجام شد.یافته‌ها: الگوی پیشنهادی پژوهش از برازش بسیار خوبی برخوردار بود. نتایج حاکی از اثر مستقیم گرایش‌های مذهبی، تاب‌آوری، امید و شادی بر سازگاری زناشویی بود (01/0 > P). همچنین، نتایج نشان‌ دهنده‌ی اثر غیر مستقیم گرایش‌های مذهبی، تاب‌آوری و امید از طریق سازگاری زناشویی بر شادی بود (05/0 > P).نتیجه‌گیری: سازگاری زناشویی یک عامل حفاظتی برای سلامت جسمی، رفاه و بهزیستی و نشانه‌ی پیشرفت و موفقیت زوجین است. با این حال، وجود این تأثیرات، بستگی به میزان سازگاری بین زوجین دارد. بنابراین، توجه به متغیرهایی همچون تاب‌آوری، گرایش‌های مذهبی و امید برای بهبود سازگاری زناشویی و ایجاد شادی و نشاط در زندگی توصیه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Compiling the Model of Some Antecedents and Outcomes of Marital Adjustment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sahar Khanjani-Veshki 1
  • Zabihollah Kaveh-Farsani 2
  • Nasim Jafari 3
  • Shima Pasha 4
  • Kioumars Beshlideh 5
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Counseling, School of Literature and Human Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
3 PhD in Family Counseling, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
4 Department of Counseling, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
5 Professor, Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: Marital adjustment can play a fundamental role in the couples’ life. Marital adjustment affects couple's physical and mental health, and increases their ability to cope with the problems and stress-making factors. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to compile the model of some antecedents and outcomes of marital adjustment.Methods: The present descriptive study was of correlational studies with structural equations modeling. The statistical population of the study included all married employees at University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran, from whom 172 people were randomly selected and responded to Snyder adults hope questionnaire, Oxford Argyle et al. happiness questionnaire, Busby et al. marital adjustment, Khodayarifard et al. assessment of religious tendency, and the scale of Connor and Davidson’s resilience. Data analysis was performed by structural equation modeling using SPSS and AMOS software.Findings: Suggested model of the study had a very good goodness of fit. The results showed the direct effect of religious tendencies, resilience, hope, and happiness on marital adjustment (P < 0.01 for all). Moreover, the results showed an indirect effect of religious tendencies, resilience, and hope on happiness through marital adjustment (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: Marital adjustment is a protective factor for physical health and well-being, and a sign of a couple's progress and success. However, the existence of these effects depends on the degree of adjustment between the couple. Therefore, it is recommended to pay attention to variables such as resilience, religious tendencies, and hope, to improve marital adjustment and to create happiness and vitality in life.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hope
  • Happiness
  • Adjustment

مراجع

  1. Rao SL. Marital adjustment and depression among couples. Int J Indian Psychol 2017; 4(2): 34-42.
  2. Mutlu B, Erkut Z, Yildirim Z, Gundogdu N. A review on the relationship between marital adjustment and maternal attachment. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2018; 64(3): 243-52.
  3. Linley PA, Joseph S. Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. J Trauma Stress 2004; 17(1): 11-21.
  4. Masten AS. Risk and resilience in development. In: Zelazo PD, editor. The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology: Self and other. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 579-607.
  5. Waller MA, Okamoto SK, Miles BW, Hurdle DE. Resiliency factors related to substance use/resistance: Perceptions of native adolescents of the southwest. J Sociol Soc Welf 2003; 30(4): 79-94.
  6. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev 2000; 71(3): 543-62.
  7. Huber CH, Navarro RL, Womble MW, Mumme FL. Family resilience and midlife marital satisfaction. Fam J 2010; 18(2): 136-45.
  8. Walsh F. A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applications. Fam Relat 2002; 51(2): 130-7.
  9. Hjemdal O, Friborg O, Braun S, Kempenaers C, Linkowski P, Fossion P. The resilience scale for adults: Construct validity and measurement in a Belgian sample. Int J Test 2011; 11(1): 53-70.
  10. Lau YK, Ma JLC, Chan YK, He L. Risk and protective factors of marital adjustment to cross-border work arrangement of Hong Kong residents: The perspective of stationary spouses. J Comp Fam Stud 2012; 43(5): 715-30.
  11. Hellman CM, Pittman MK, Munoz RT. The first twenty years of the will and the ways: An examination of score reliability distribution on Snyder’s Dispositional Hope Scale. J Happiness Stud 2013; 14(3): 723-9.
  12. Hoy BD, Suldo SM, Mendez LR. Links between parents' and children's levels of gratitude, life satisfaction, and hope. J Happiness Stud 2013; 14(4): 1343-61.
  13. Moraitou D, Efklides A. The wise thinking and acting questionnaire: The cognitive facet of wisdom and its relation with memory, affect, and hope. J Happiness Stud 2012; 13(5): 849-73.
  14. Snyder CR. Hope and depression: A light in the darkness. J Soc Clin Psychol 2004; 23(3): 347-51.
  15. Chang EC, Banks KH. The color and texture of hope: Some preliminary findings and implications for hope theory and counseling among diverse racial/ethnic groups. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2007; 13(2): 94-103.
  16. Valle MF, Huebner ES, Suldo SM. An analysis of hope as a psychological strength. J Sch Psychol 2006; 44(5): 393-406.
  17. Alidina K, Tettero I. Exploring the therapeutic value of hope in palliative nursing. Palliat Support Care 2010; 8(3): 353-8.
  18. Stevens R. Erik H. Erikson: Explorer of identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
  19. Olson JR, Goddard HW, Marshall JP. Relations among risk, religiosity, and marital commitment. J Couple Relatsh Ther 2013; 12(3): 235-54.
  20. Mahoney A. Religion in families 1999 to 2009: A relational spirituality framework. J Marriage Fam 2010; 72(4): 805-27.
  21. Hunler OS, Gencoz T. The effect of religiousness on marital satisfaction: Testing the mediator role of marital problem solving between religiousness and marital satisfaction relationship. Contemp Fam 2005; 27(1): 123-36.
  22. Ellison CG, Trinitapoli JA, Anderson KL, Johnson BR. Race/ethnicity, religious involvement, and domestic violence. Violence Against Women 2007; 13(11): 1094-112.
  23. Allgood SM, Harris S, Skogrand L, Lee TR. Marital commitment and religiosity in a religiously homogenous population. Marriage Fam Rev 2009; 45(1): 52-67.
  24. Gaunt R. Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier? J Pers 2006; 74(5): 1401-20.
  25. Dollahite DC, Lambert NM. Forsaking all others: How religious involvement promotes marital fidelity in christian, jewish, and muslim couples. Rev Relig Res 2007; 48(3): 290-307.
  26. Briscoe M. The separation of church and mate: how does church attendance impact marital satisfaction and why. Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences 2015; 14(1).
  27. Goddard HW, Marshall JP, Olson JR, Dennis SA. Character strengths and religiosity as predictors of marital satisfaction in a sample of highly religious and divorce-prone couples. J Couple Relatsh Ther 2012; 11(1): 2-15.
  28. Atkins DC, Kessel DE. Religiousness and infidelity: Attendance, but not faith and prayer, predict marital fidelity. Marriage Fam 2008; 70(2): 407-18.
  29. Kim HK, McKenry PC. The relationship between marriage and psychological well-being: A Longitudinal analysis. J Fam Issues 2002; 23(8): 885-911.
  30. Zimmermann AC, Easterlin RA. Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and happiness in Germany. Popul Dev Rev 2006; 32(3): 511-28.
  31. Stutzer A, Frey BS. Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? The Journal of Socio-Economics 2006; 35(2): 326-47.
  32. Frey BS, Stutzer A. What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 2002; 40(2): 402-35.
  33. Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M. Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J Econ Psychol 2008; 29(1): 94-122.
  34. Gatezadeh A, skandari h. Test Causal Model of depression on lifestyle through the mediation of social health and quality of life in adults in Ahvaz. Journal of Psychological Models and Methods 2018; 8(30): 123-40. [In Persian].
  35. Snyder CR. Hope and depression: A light in the darkness. J Soc Clin Psychol 2004; 23(3): 347-51.
  36. Kermani Z, Khodapanahi M, Heidari M. psychometrics features of the Snyder Hope Scale. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011; 5(3): 7-23. [In Persian].
  37. Argyle M, Crossland J. The dimensions of positive emotions. Br J Soc Psychol 1987; 26(2):127-37.
  38. Argyle M, Lu L. The happiness of extraverts. Pers Individ Dif 1990; 11(10): 1011-7.
  39. Ziapour A, Khatony A, Jafari F, Kianipour N. Correlation of personality traits with happiness among university students. J Clin Diagn Res 2018; 12(4): 26-9.
  40. Khodayarifard M, Shokouhi YM, Ghobari BB. Preparing a scale to measure religious attitudes of college students. Journal of Psychology 2000; 4(3): 268-85. [In Persian].
  41. Ebrahimi A. Factor structure, reliability and validity of Religious Attitude Scale. J Fundam Ment Health 2008; 10(38): 107-16. [In Persian].
  42. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003; 18(2):
  43. -82.
  44. Habibi F, Safarzadeh S. Predicting job stress on the basis of coping strategies, spiritual intelligence and resilience in employees with chronic pains in National Iranian South Oil Fields Company. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology 2017; 18(3): 76-85. [In Persian].
  45. Busby DM, Christensen C, Crane DR, Larson JH. A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. J Marital Fam Ther 1995; 21(3):289-308.
  46. Hollist CS, Miller RB. Perceptions of attachment style and marital quality in midlife marriage. Fam Relat 2005; 54(1): 46-57.
  47. Isanezhad O, Ahmadi SA, Etemadi A. Effectiveness of relationship enhancement on marital quality of couples. Journal of Behavioral Sciences 2010; 4(1): 9-16. [In Persian].
  48. Ghasemi V. Structural equation modeling in social research with application of Amos Graphic. Tehran, Iran: Sociologists Publications; 2013. [In Persian].
  49. Fincham FD, Beach SRH. Of memes and marriage: Toward a positive relationship science. J Fam Theory Rev 2010; 2(1): 4-24.
  50. Stafford L, David P, McPherson S. Sanctity of marriage and marital quality. J Soc Pers Relat 2014; 31(1): 54-70.
  51. Mahoney A, Pargament KI, Jewell T, Swank AB, Scott E, Emery E, et al. Marriage and the spiritual realm: The role of proximal and distal religious constructs in marital functioning. J Fam Psychol 1999; 13(3): 321-38.
  52. Heaton TB. Religious Homogamy and marital satisfaction reconsidered. J Marriage Fam 1984; 46(3): 729-33.
  53. Williams LM, Lawler MG. Marital satisfaction and religious heterogamy: A comparison of interchurch and same-church individuals. J Fam Issues 2003; 24(8): 1070-92.
  54. Sullivan KT. Understanding the relationship between religiosity and marriage: An investigation of the immediate and longitudinal effects of religiosity on newlywed couples. J Fam Psychol 2001; 15(4): 610-26.
  55. Neff LA, Broady EF. Stress resilience in early marriage: can practice make perfect? J Pers Soc Psychol 2011; 101(5): 1050-67.
  56. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004; 86(2): 320-33.
  57. Bradley JM, Hojjat M. A model of resilience and marital satisfaction. J Soc Psychol 2017; 157(5): 588-601.
  58. Greeff AP, Ritman IN. Individual characteristics associated with resilience in single-parent families. Psychol Rep 2005; 96(1): 36-42.
  59. Rajput Nitu R. Marital adjustment and happiness. Int J Indian Psychol 2017; 5(1): 116-23.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
دوره 38، شماره 569 - شماره پیاپی 569
خرداد و تیر 1399
صفحه 193-200

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 30 دی 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 06 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 فروردین 1401

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار